Cover not available

Article published In: FORUM
Vol. 5:2 (2007) ► pp.39–56

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Transfer of Frames during Simultaneous Interpreting

 | Kyung Hee University
Published online: 1 October 2007
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.5.2.03lee
L’nterprétation simultanée est considérée comme un processus difficile où l’interprète doit jongler plusieurs tâches en même temps. Pour cette raison, toute augmentation de la capacité de traitement de l’interprète peut déclencher des déficits dans la communication. Le désaccord de cadre entre la langue source et la langue cible pose des difficultés pour l’interprète puisque l’interprète doit mettre plus d’efforts de traitement supplémentaires pour combler le fossé. Pour réaliser la communication, l’interprète doit stratégiquement convertir des cadres de la langue source à ceux de la langue cible pour des tâches différentes. Dans ces recherches, il est montré que l’interprète non seulement reconnaît le désaccord de cadre et ajuste ses productions pour l’audience de la langue cible mais aussi la conversion est faite dans une façon d’économiser le temps et des efforts stratégiquement.
References (16)
Cheong, H.J. (2000). The Implications of Frame Semantics for Translation, Conference Interpretation and Translation, vol. 21. 151–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, S.N. (2003). Presupposition in Translation – Translation into Korean, Conference Interpretation and Translation, vol. 5-21. 195–220.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. & A. Duranti (eds.) (1992) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Contextualization and Understanding. In C. Goodwin & A. Duranti (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, R. (1998). Conference Interpreting Explained. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalian, Sylvia. (2005). Quality Assurance for Interpreting Processes, Meta, L-21. 768 – 784. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chun, S. (2001). Beon-yeok-eui-eo-nul [Translations Today] Lederer, M. (1994). La Traduction Aujourd’hui. Seoul: Korea University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, C.S. (1999). A Frame Analysis of the Process of Interpretation, Conference Interpretation and Translation. Vol. 1.1 103–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nida, E. & C. Taber (1982). The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riccardi, A. (2005). On the Evolution of Interpreting Strategies in Simultaneous Interpreting, Meta L-21. 253–267.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seleskovitch, D. (1978). Interpreting for International Conferences. Washington, D.C.: Pen and Booth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seleskovitch, D. & M. Lederer. (1989). A Systematic Approach to Teaching Interpretation. Translated by J. Harmer (1995). Luxemburg: European CommunitiesGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1993). What’s in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations In Tannen, D. (ed) Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry. (1998). The Conditions of Contextual Meaning. In Malmkjær, J. (eds.) Context in Language Learning and Language Understanding. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue