Cover not available

Article published In: FORUM
Vol. 4:2 (2006) ► pp.163–190

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Translation, Interlingual, Mediation and the Elusive Chimera of Equivalence

 | Buenos Aires |
Published online: 1 October 2006
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.4.2.09via
Abstract/Résumé
Selon García Landa, la communication réussit lorsque la représentation mentale que l’interlocuteur se fait du sens voulu par l’orateur coïncide avec celle que le locuteur lui même s’en fait. De cet point de vue, la traduction consiste à (re-)produire de telles représentations à travers la barrière linguistique. Cependant, dans le but d’optimiser la communication et ne pas simplement de la rendre possible, souvent, traducteurs et interprètes doivent faire plus, moins et quelque chose d’autre que «traduire», ce qui explique le fait que le concept d’équivalence reste polémique, voir insaisissable.
References (16)
References
Chesterman, A. (1996). On Similarity, Target 8 (1), 159–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Landa, M. (2001). Teoría de la traducción. Vertere, Monográficos De La Revista Hermeneus Núm. 31, Soria.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutt, E.-A. (2000). Translation and relevance. Cognition and context. Manchester-Boston: St. JeromeGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). “The Fault Line in Our Common Ground.” Target, 12 (2), 356–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lvovskaja, Z. D. (1985). Teoreticheskie problemy perevoda. Vyshaja shkola: Moscow.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Problemas actuales de la traducción. Granada: Serie Granada Lingüística.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nida, E. (1964). Toward a science of translating. Leiden: J. Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osimo, B. (2001). Propedeutica della traduzione. Corso introduttivo con tavole sinottiche. Milano: Editori Ulrico Hoepli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Manuale del traduttore. Milano: Editori Ulrico Hoepli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pilkington, A. (2000). Poetic Effects: A relevance theory perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reiss, K., & Vermeer, H.J. (1991). Fundamentos para una teoría funcional de la traducción. Madrid: Akal Ediciones.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, S. D. (1981). Translation and Similarity. In Ross, M. G. (Ed.), Translation spectrum. Essays in theory and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press, 8–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seleskovitch, D., & Lederer, M. (1989) Pédagogie raisonnée de l’interprétation. Paris: Didier Érudition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986/1995) Relevance. communication and cognition. Oxford/ Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viaggio, S. (2006) A general theory of interlingual mediation. Berlin: Frank & Timme Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

al-Zahran, Aladdin
2008. Consecutive Conference Interpreters’ Perception of Their Role as Intercultural Mediators. FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 6:2 ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue