Making Sense of it All
Public service interpreters as reflec (x) tive practitioners?
Published online: 1 October 2006
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.4.2.08tip
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.4.2.08tip
Abstract/Résumé
Le développement de la réflexion sur la pratique professionnelle au sein des programmes de formation professionnelle des interprètes en milieu social apporte à ces interprètes un moyen d’évaluer, de valider ou de valoriser leurs connaissances vis-à-vis du lieu de travail et du soi dans le contexte professionnel. Cet article porte un regard critique sur les modèles de réflexion qui ont été élaborés dans le contexte de l’interprétation en milieu social au Royaume Uni, dans lequel une approche par compétences est considérée prédominante. L’article plaide en faveur d’un cadre qui tiendrait compte de la dialectique individu-lieu de travail et qui fournirait plus de place à l’autocritique pour pouvoir permettre aux interprètes de connaître le lieu de travail dans lequel ils travaillent et faciliter la tâche a priori ardue de la conciliation du soi et du travail dans de tels contextes. Une approche basée sur ‘l’enquête expressive’ est considérée en tant que moyen qui permet aux interprètes de cerner les réponses intuitives au contexte professionnel et de comprendre les éléments les plus abstraits de leur pratique, parmi lesquels la difficulté de la « compréhension de la part des autres » est considérée comme la plus importante.
References (40)
Angelelli, C.V. (2004). Revisiting the interpreter’s role: A study of conference, court, and medical interpreters in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Barnett, R. (1999). Learning to work and working to learn. InD. Boud & J. Garrick (eds). Understanding learning at work. London: Routledge, 29–44.
Billett, S. (2001). Learning Throughout Working Life: Interdependencies at work, Studies in Continuing Education, 23,1, 19–35.
Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1991). Experience and learning: Reflection at work. Victoria: Deakin University.
Clegg, S. (2000). Knowing through reflective practice in higher education. Education Action Research, 8,3, 451–469.
Cohen, A. P. (1994). Self consciousness: An alternative anthropology of identity. London: Routledge.
Crotty, M. (1996). Doing phenomenology. InP. Willis & B. Neville (eds). Qualitative research practice in adult education. David Lovell Publishing: Ringwood, Victoria.
Darling, I. (1998). Action Evaluation and Action Theory: An assessment of the process and its connection to conflict resolution. Education as inquiry: A teacher action research site, [URL] (Accessed: 6 January 2006).
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: DC Heath.
Fenwick, T.J. (1998). Women Composing Selves, Seeking Authenticity: A study of women’s development in the workplace. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 17, 3, 199–217.
(1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning — Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The Postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University.
Marsick, V. (1990). Action Learning and Reflection in the Workplace. In Mezirow, J. and Associates, (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 23–46.
Mezirow, J. (1978). Education for perspective transformation; Women’s re-entry programs in community colleges. New York: Teacher’s College, Columbia University.
& Associates (eds). (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Michelson, E. (1996). Usual Suspects: Experience, reflection, and the (en)gendering of knowledge. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 15, 6, 438–454.
Mohanty, J., & McKenna, W. (eds). (1989). Husserl’s phenomenology: A textbook. Washington, D.C.: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology & University Press of America.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2001). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. InC. Bryant & D. Jary (eds). (2001). The Contemporary Giddens: Social theory in a globalizing age. London/New York: Palgrave, 62–96.
Reason, P. (ed). (1988). Human inquiry in action: Developments in new paradigm research. London: Sage.
Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language. InA. Ortony (ed). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 284–324.
Schutz, A. (1975). On phenomenology and social relations. (H. Wagner, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Smyth, J. (1989). A critical pedagogy of classroom practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21,6, 483–502.
