Cover not available

Article published In: FORUM
Vol. 4:2 (2006) ► pp.113–138

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

L’évaluation en traduction pédagogique, technique et scientifique

deuxieme partie

 | Université de Franche Comté, Laseldi, Montbéliard |

Article language: French

Published online: 1 October 2006
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.4.2.07min
Abstract/Résumé
From September 2004 to January 2006, we analysed 545 tests of English to French translations, written by French mother tongue university students. The analysis showed that errors can be divided into four major categories: comprehension, expression, research and proofreading, which correspond to the major steps a professional translator has to respect. Our objective is to present an error tree taking into consideration the analysed errors but also other potential ones, to facilitate evaluation and also help students adopt a pro-active attitude. This error tree is intended to take into account procedures a professional translator has to go through and it is considered evolutive.
References (32)
References
Allal, L. (1979). Stratégies d’évaluation formative : conceptions psychopédagogiques et modalités d’application. In L. Allal, J. Cardinet et P. Perrenoud (éd), 1981, 1983, 1985, L’évaluation formative dans un enseignement différencié. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbier, J-M. (1985). L’évaluation en formation. Paris: ¨PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bastin, G. (2000). Evaluating Beginners’Re-expression and Creativity: A positive approach. The Translator, studies in intercultural communication. 6(2). St Jerome Publishing, Manchester, UK, (231–245)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanc, N. & Brouillet, D. (2003). Mémoire et compréhension. Paris: Editions In Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boileau, N. (1952), L’art poétique, 1, Œuvres complètes, Paris, Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cambell, S. J. (1991). Toward a model of translation competence. Meta, XXXVI, 2, 83–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Darbelnet, J. (1977). Niveaux de traduction. Babel, 13–1, 6–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delisle, J., Lee-Jahnke, H. & Cormier M.C. (1999). Terminologie de la traduction. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dictionnaire de linguistique et des sciences du langage (1994) sous la direction de Jean Dubois. Paris: Larousse.
La Grammaire aujourd’hui, Guide alphabétique de linguistique française (1986), M. Arrivé, F. Gadet, M. Galmiche, Paris 1986, Flammarion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gouadec, D. (1989). Le traducteur, la traduction et l’entreprise. Paris: AFNOR.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gouadec, D (1981). Paramètres de l’évaluation des traductions. Meta, XXVI–2, 99–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hadji, C. (1990). L’évaluation, règles du jeu (2ème Ed.). Paris: ESF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). L’évaluation des actions éducatives. Paris: PUF. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, J. (1981). A Model for translation quality assessment. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurtado Albir, A., (1995). La didáctica de la traducción. Evolución y estado actual. Perspectivas de la traducción, Universitad de Valladolid, 49–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuusmaul, P. (1995). Training the translator. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladmiral, J.R. (1979). Traduire : Théorèmes pour la traduction. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larose, R. (1989). Théories contemporaines de la traduction, Québec, 2ème édition, Presses Universitaires du Québec.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinez Melis, N. (2001), Evaluation et didactique de la traduction : le cas de la traduction dans la langue étrangère. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament de Traducciò i Interpretatiò.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merle, P. (1998). Sociologie de l'évaluation scolaire. Paris: PUF, Que sais-je ? n°32781.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minacori-Vibert, P. (1999). La compréhension en traduction : aspects pratiques pour les étudiants traducteurs francophones et non francophones. French studies in southern Africa, 281, 109–132.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). La traduction scientifique et technique : la notion de texte et ses implications pédagogiques. Revue des lettres et de traduction, Université de Saint-Esprit, Kaslik, Faculté des Lettres, n°71, 87–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Positionnement épistémologique de la traduction scientifique et technique et implications pédagogiques. Meta L-41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmark, P. (1991). About translation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noizet, G. & Caverni J.P., (1978). Psychologie de l’évaluation scolaire. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nord, C. (1993). La evaluación de errores en la enseňanza de traducción, summary of postgraduate course given in the Universitad de Las Palmas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pacte (2000). Acquiring translation competence: Hypotheses and methodological problems of a research project. Investigating translation. (A. Beeby, D. Ensigner, M. Presas, eds) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation, in R. Tyler, R.M. Gagné et M. Scriven, Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Chicago: Rand Mac Nally,. 39–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanfield, C. W., Scott, M. L., & Kenyon, D. M. (1992). The measurement of translation ability. The modern language journal, 76–iv, 455–467. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waddington, C. (2001). Different methods of evaluation student translations: The question of validity. Meta, XLVI1, 21, 2001, 311–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue