Cover not available

Article published In: FORUM
Vol. 2:1 (2004) ► pp.47–70

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Process-oriented Pedagogical Translation Evaluation

 | Dongduk Women’s University |
Published online: 1 April 2004
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.2.1.04kim
Abstract/Résumé
L’évaluation d’une traduction varie considérablement selon qu’elle porte sur le travail d’un traducteur professionnel ou d’un apprenti–traducteur. Le présent article traite de l’évaluation pédagogique centrée de manière constructive sur le processus de la traduction. Cette démarche, qui met l’accent sur la fonction formative, a pour but d’obtenir les informations butiles à la formation des étudiants plutôt que de tester ceux-ci. Dans cette optique, notre étude propose d’évaluer la relation entre le processus de traduction et la qualité finale de celle-ci selon un modèle quadripartite, c’est-à-dire dans les quatre cas suivants: processus correct/résultat correct, processus correct/résultat incorrect, processus incorrect/résultat correct et processus incorrect/résultat incorrect. L’évaluation basée sur ce modèle nous permet d’analyser le processus mental qui se déroule durant l’activité traductionnelle des étudiants et d’expliquer non seulement leurs erreurs mais aussi leurs réussites. Les informations ainsi obtenues seront d’une grande utilité pour les enseignants en leur permettant de fournir un retour d’information aux étudiants et d’enrichir leurs ressources pédagogiques. Un exemple d’évaluation fondé sur ce modèle est presenté et les résultats en sont analysés en détail.
References (17)
References
Baker, M. (1998). Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bastin, G.L., (2000). Evaluating beginners’ re-expression and creativity: A positive approach. The Translator 6(2), 231–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, J. (1995). Professional versus student behavior. In C. Dollerup & V. Appel (Eds.), Teaching translation and interpreting 3: New horizons: Papers from the third language international conference (pp. 243–250). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerloff, P. (1986). Second language learners’ reports on the interpretive process: Talk-aloud protocols of translation. In J. House & B. Kulka (Eds.), Interlingual and intercultural communication: Discourse and cognition in translation and second language acquisition studies ((pp. 243–262). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, J. S. (1972). The name and nature of translation studies. Unpublished manuscript, Amsterdam: Translation Studies Section, Department of General Studies. Reprinted in G. Toury (Ed.), Translation across cultures, 1987, New Delhi: Bahri Publications, and in Holmes, 1988, 66–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Translated! Papers on literary translation and translation studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, J. (1998). Translation quality. In M. Baker (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies (pp. 197–200). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Translation quality assessment: Linguistic description versus social evaluation. Meta, XLVL(2), 243–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jääskeläinen, R. (1993). Investigating translating strategies. In S. Tirkonnen-Condit & J. Laffling (Eds.), Recent trends in empirical translation research. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jääskeläinen, R. & Tirkkonen-Condit, S. (1991). Automatised processes in professional vs. non-professional translation: A think-aloud protocol study. In S. Tirkkonen-Condit (Ed.), Empirical research in translation and intercultural studies (pp. 89–110). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, R. (2001). The cognitive processes of English-Korean tanslation by a translator and a language learner. Conference Interpretation and Translation, 31, 5–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiraly, D. C. (1995). Pathways to translation: Pedagogy and process. Kent, Ohio: The Kent State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kussmaul, P. (1995). Training the translator. Philadelpia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lörscher, W. (1991). Translation performance, translation process, and translation strategies: A psycholinguistic investigation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Thinking aloud as a method for collecting data on translation processes. In S. Tirkkonen-Condit (Ed.), Empirical research in translation and intercultural studies (pp. 67–78). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melis, N.M. & Albir, A.H. (2001). Assessment in translation studies: Research needs. Meta, XLVI(2), 272–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Tekwa, Kizito
2024. Process-oriented collaborative translation within the training environment: comparing team and individual trainee performances using a video-ethnography approach. Education and Information Technologies 29:5 ► pp. 6443 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue