Cover not available

Article published In: FORUM
Vol. 10:2 (2012) ► pp.117–135

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Differences in Nominalization between Korean and English and Their Implications for Translation

 | Graduate School of Translation & Interpretation, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies |
Published online: 1 October 2012
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.10.2.06lee
Abstract/Résumé
Ce document examine les différences dans la métaphore grammaticale, en particulier, nominalization entre coréen et en anglais et leurs implications pour la traduction anglaiscoréen. Après avoir discuté un cadre théorique pour ces discussions, l'article montr comment nominalization dans le cadre de syndromes (grappes de métaphores grammaticales qui se produisent dans une seule phrase ou la clause) est relativement restreint en coréen. Cela est suivi par une petite étude de cas qui montre que des textes littéraires coréennes traduites en anglais ont tendance à manque d'expressions nominalized, prenant le rôle d'agent dans les bring process clauses, en comparaison avec textes authentiques. L'article discute certaines implications éducatives de ces conclusions.
References (16)
References
Bloor, T. & Bloor, M. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach (2nd ed.). London: Arnold. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farahani, A. A. & Hadidi, Y. (2008). Semogenesis under scrutiny: Grammatical metaphor in science and modern prose fiction. IJAL, 11(2), 51–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K (2004a). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (revised by Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen) (3rd ed.). New York: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (2004b). Language of Science, Vol.5 in the Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday (edited by Jonathan J Webster). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1st ed.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.. & Matthiessen, C. (1999). Construing Experience through Meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayvaert, L. (2003). Nominalization as grammatical metaphor: Pn the need for a radically systemic and metafunctional approach. In A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical Metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics. (pp. 63–99) Amsterdam: John Benjamin. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knowles, M. & Moon, R. (2006). Introducing Metaphor. Oxon: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing ([URL]).
Ravelli, Louise, J. (2003). Renewal of connection: Integrating theory and practice in an understanding of grammatical metaphor. In A. M. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers & L. Ravelli (Eds.), Grammatical Metaphor: Views from systemic functional linguistics. (pp. 37–64) Amsterdam: John Benjamin. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. and David R. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, M. (2012). Wordsmith Tools (version 6.0). Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing Functional Grammar. London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teich, E. (2003). Cross-Linguistic Variation in System and Text: A methodology for the investigation of translations and comparable texts. Berlin: Walter & Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ki-Seong Park
2015. Grammatical Metaphorizing in SFL and Its Implication in English-Korean Translation. Studies in Linguistics null:37 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue