Cover not available

Review article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 9:1 (2002) ► pp.87–102

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Review article

Frederick J. Newmeyer’s Language Form and Language Function

Reviewer
 | Nijmegen University
Published online: 19 November 2002
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.9.1.06foo
References (45)
References
Arnold, J., T. Wasow, A. Losongco and R. Ginstrom. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: the effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 761: 28–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barlow, M. and S. Kemmer (eds.) (2000). Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batistella, E. (2000). Review of Newmeyer (1998). Journal of Linguistics 361: 431–439.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. and J. Aissen. (2002). Optimality and functionality: Objections and refutations. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 201: 81–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1999). The origins of complex language: An inquiry into the evolutionary beginning of sentences, syllables and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Contini-Morava, E. (1995) Introduction: On linguistic sign theory. In E. Contini-Morava and B. Sussman Goldberg (eds.) Meaning as explanation: Advances in linguistic sign theory. Berlin: Mouton. 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copeland, J. E. (2000) Introduction. In D. G. Lockwood, P. H. Fries and J. E. Copeland (eds.) Functional approaches to language, culture and cognition: Papers in honor of Sydney M. Lamb. Amsterdam: Benjamins. xiii–xxiii. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1995). Autonomy and functional linguistics. Language 711: 490–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cureton, R. D. (2001). Review of Newmeyer (1998). Journal of English Linguistics 291: 72–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Darnell, M., E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan and K. Wheatley (eds.) (1999). Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, S. (1986). On the notion “Functional explanation”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11: 11–52. (Special issue on ‘Functional explanations in linguistics’) Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, E. J. (2002). Form and function in syntactic theory: a reaction to Newmeyer. Language Sciences 241: 29–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harder, P. (1999) Partial autonomy. Ontology and methodology in cognitive linguistics. In Th. Janssen and G. Redeker (eds.) Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology. Berlin: Mouton. 195–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, R. A. (1993). The linguistics wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1999). Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 181: 180–205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Why can’t we talk to each other? Lingua 1101: 235–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Why are categories adjacent? Journal of Linguistics 371: 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huck, G. J. and J. A. Goldsmith. (1995). Ideology and linguistic theory: Noam Chomsky and the deep structure debate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirby, S. (1999). Function, selection and innateness: The emergence oflanguage universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuno, S. and Ken-ichi Takami. (1997) Structural or functional accounts? In A. Kamio (ed.) Directions in functional linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 221–249Academic Press Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1999) Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise. In Th. Janssen and G. Redeker (eds.) Cognitive linguistics: Foundations, scope, and methodology. Berlin: Mouton. 13–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moravcsik, E. (2000). Review of Newmeyer (1998). Language 761: 168–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nettle, D. (1999). Linguistic diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (1980). Linguistic theory in America. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1983). Grammatical theory: Its limits and its possibilities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). Linguistic theory in America. Orlando: Academic Press. (Second, revised edition of Newmeyer. (1980))Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Generative linguistics: A historical perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999a). Adaptation, optimality and functional explanation: Two serious problems. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 181:235–237. (peer comment on Haspelmath. 1999). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999b) Review of M. Tomasello (ed.) (1998). Journal of Linguistics 351: 651–655. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000a) The discrete nature of syntactic categories. Against a prototype-based account. In R. Borsley (ed.) The nature and function of syntactic categories. (Syntax and Semantics, 321.). San Diego: Academic Press. 221–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000b). Three book-length studies of language evolution. Review article on Carstairs-McCarthy. (1999), Kirby. (1999) and Nettle. (1999). Journal of Linguistics 361: 383–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001a). The Prague School and North American functionalist approaches to syntax. Journal of Linguistics 371: 101–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001b). Deconstructing grammaticalization. Language Sciences 231:187–229. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Optimality and functionality: A critique of functionally-based optimality-theoretic syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 201: 43–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(to appear) Where is Functional Explanation? CLS 371.
Saussure, F. de. (1968 [1916]) Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seuren, P. A. M. (1996). Semantic syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stassen, L. (1985). Comparison and universal grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tallerman, M. (2000). Review of Newmeyer (1998). Studies in Language 241: 423–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (ed.) (1998). The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, Vol. I1. Prague, 1929.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue