Cover not available

Article In: Functions of Language: Online-First Articles

A cross-linguistic computational study on one new idea per clause

ORCiD logo with link | University of Zurich
ORCiD logo with link | University of Zurich
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
We investigate a notion related to Chafe’s One New Idea Constraint (ONICON), namely that clauses only contain one new idea at a time. We investigate both the nominal and the verbal domain in discourse production data from 16 diverse languages. We find no convincing evidence for a hard constraint on the number of new ideas per clause, nor for speakers actively managing information flow in discourse. The absence of an underlying ONICON is suggested by (1) the fact that NPs co-occurring in a single clause do not have more accessible referents, (2) that observed distributions of information can likewise be reproduced by a randomised mechanism, and (3) the absence of a presentational referent activation pattern. A more likely account of observed discourse production pattern is producers’ overall goal to be both contentful and coherent, the former implying the mentioning of a considerable number of entities and the latter implying predications about these entities. It is in this sense that there is audience design, rather than in an avoidance of information overcharge.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The one-new-idea pattern and underlying constraints
  • 3.Study design
    • 3.1Corpus data and feature extraction
    • 3.2Measuring information throughput in production data
    • 3.3Measuring active information management
    • 3.4Hypotheses
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Nominal new ideas
    • 4.2Verbal new ideas
    • 4.3Information management
  • 5.Discussion
  • Author queries
  • References
References (65)
References
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer E. 2010. How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(4). 187–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barth, Danielle, Kira Davey & Maria Matheas. 2023. Multi-CAST Matukar Panau. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bogomolova, Natalia, Dmitry Ganenkov & Nils N. Schiborr 2021. Multi-CAST Tabasaran. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, Susan E. 1995. Centering attention in discourse. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(2). 137–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater. 2016. The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 391. e62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Gregory L. Murphy. Audience design in meaning and reference. In Jean-François Le Ny & Walter Kintsch (eds.), Advances in psychology, 287–299. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Comrie, Bernard, Martin Haspelmath & Balthasar Bickel. The Leipzig glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Croft, William. 2007. Intonation units and grammatical structure in Wardaman and in cross-linguistic perspective. Australian Journal of Linguistics 27(1). 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John. W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4). 805–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Discourse and grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 47–88. Mahwah, MA: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egurtzegi, Aitor, Damián E. Blasi, Sebastian Sauppe, Balthasar Bickel & Stefan Schnell. 2025. Discourse ergativity and human reference in Basque. Studies in Language 49(3). 682–711. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5). 429–448. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forker, Diana & Nils N. Schiborr. 2019. Multi-CAST Sanzhi Dargwa. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ganenkov, Dmitry & Nils N. Schiborr. 2025. Multi-CAST Chirag. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2507. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1975. Focus and scope of assertion: Some Bantu evidence. Studies in African Linguistics 6(2). 185–205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse, 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2004. Discourse and argument structure. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 427–441. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2). 274–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hadjidas, Harris & Maria Vollmer. 2015. Multi-CAST Cypriot Greek. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey & Stefan Schnell. 2014. Annotations using GRAID (Grammatical relations and animacy in discourse): Introduction and guidelines for annotators (version 7.0). Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. The discourse basis of ergativity revisited. Language 92(3). 591–618. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey, Stefan Schnell & Nils Norman Schiborr. 2021. Universals of reference in discourse and grammar: Evidence from the Multi-CAST collection of spoken corpora. In Geoffrey Haig, Stefan Schnell & Frank Seifart (eds.), Doing corpus-based typology with spoken language corpora: State of the art, 141–177. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey, Maria Vollmer & Hanna Thiele. 2019. Multi-CAST Northern Kurdish. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2022. Prosodic phrasing and the emergence of phrase structure. Linguistics 60(3). 715–743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., Meytal Sandler, Jan Strunk & Volker Unterladstetter. 2018. On the universality of intonational phrases: A cross-linguistic interrater study. Phonology 35(2). 207–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1972. On communicative competence. In John B. Pride & Janet Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings, 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inbar, Maya, Shir Genzer, Anat Perry, Eitan Grossman & Ayelet N. Landau. 2023. Intonation units in spontaneous speech evoke a neural response. Journal of Neuroscience 43(48). 8189–8200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. Florian. 2010. Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61(1). 23–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1976. Discourse referents. In James D. McCawley (ed.), Notes from the linguistic underground, 363–385. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Konopka, Agnieszka E. 2012. Planning ahead: How recent experience with structures and words changes the scope of linguistic planning. Journal of Memory and Language 66(1). 143–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kurabe, Keita. 2021. Multi-CAST Jinghpaw. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In June Helm (ed.), Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society, 12–44. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy, Roger & T. Florian Jaeger. 2007. Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. In Bernhard Schölkopf, John Platt & Thomas Hofmann (eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 19: Proceedings of the 2006 conference, 849–856. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linders, Guido M. & Stefan Schnell. 2025. Functional factors predict referential choice similarly across languages: A cross-linguistic computational analysis. PsyArXiv. 23p4m_v1. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, Maryellen C. 2013. How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 4(226). 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meng, Chenxi. 2019. Multi-CAST Tulil. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Stefan Schnell. 2015. Multi-CAST Teop. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Frances H. Syder. 2000. The one-clause-at-a-time hypothesis. In Heidi Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on fluency, 163–199. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peck, Naomi & Laura Becker. 2024. Syntactic pausing? Re-examining the associations. Linguistics Vanguard 10(1). 223–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polanyi, Livia. 2005. The linguistic structure of discourse. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 265–281. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2025. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Schiborr, Nils N. 2015. Multi-CAST English. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. MulticastR: A companion to the Multi-CAST collection. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2023. Lexical anaphora. A corpus-based typological study of referential choice. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiborr, Nils N., Stefan Schnell & Hanna Thiele. 2018. RefIND — Referent indexing in natural-language discourse: Annotation guidelines (v1.1). Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schnell, Stefan. 2015. Multi-CAST Vera’a. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schnell, Stefan, Nils N. Schiborr & Geoffrey Haig. 2021. Efficiency in discourse processing: Does morphosyntax adapt to accommodate new referents? Linguistics Vanguard 7(s3). 20190064. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank & Tai Hong. 2022. Multi-CAST Bora. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank, Jan Strunk, Swintha Danielsen, Iren Hartmann, Brigitte Pakendorf, Søren Wichmann, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Nivja H. de Jong & Balthasar Bickel. 2018. Nouns slow down speech across structurally and culturally diverse languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(22). 5720–5725. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27(3). 379–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shiohara, Asako. 2022. Multi-CAST Sumbawa. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Mark & Linda Wheeldon. 1999. High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition 73(3). 205–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thieberger, Nick & Timothy Brickell. 2019. Multi-CAST Nafsan. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Chad L. 1990. On the treatment of topical objects in Chepang: Passive or inverse? Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language” 14(2). 405–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tily, Harry & Steven Piantadosi. 2009. Refer efficiently: Use less informative expressions for more predictable meanings. In Kees van Deemter, Albert Gatt, Roger P. van Gompel & Emiel J. Krahmer (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on the Production of Referring Expressions: Bridging the gap between computational and empirical approaches to reference (PRE-CogSci 2009), 1–8. Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venhuizen, Noortje J. & Harm Brouwer. 2025. Referential retrieval and integration in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective. Psychological Review. Published online. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, Eline. 2021. Multi-CAST Kalamang. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vollmer, Maria. 2020. Multi-CAST Mandarin. In Geoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Version 2311. Bamberg: University of Bamberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zipf, George K. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue