Article In: Functions of Language: Online-First Articles
Dependent-marked anticausatives in Old Norse-Icelandic
Modeling productive and unproductive alternations
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
The process of anticausativization is well known in the functional and typological literature as involving a
morphological affix on the head, i.e. the verb. In this article, we introduce to the field a different type of anticausatives
which are dependent-marked and not head-marked. That is, the subject of the intransitive carries the same morphological case,
namely accusative, as the object of the corresponding transitive, while the verb remains unmarked in both alternants. This
research is based on 119 causative–anticausative pairs of this type in Old Norse-Icelandic, of which 80 are presented in the
literature for the first time. Since the head, the verb, is morphologically unmarked, the question arises as to the directionality
of the alternation. We argue that the causative alternant is the basic one, while the intransitive anticausative is ‘derived’, due
to both morphological and semantic considerations, in particular the fact that many accusative anticausatives have developed
metaphorical meanings. We couch our analysis in the formalism of CxG, showing how changes in the productivity of the alternation
may be modeled. While the data discussed here are mostly confined to Old Norse-Icelandic, the distinction between head-marking and
dependent-marking anticausativization is clearly of relevance for general linguists, functionalists and typologists alike.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Accusative anticausatives: Head vs. dependent marking
- 3.Oblique anticausatives in Old Norse-Icelandic
- 3.1The dataset
- 3.2Semantic criteria
- 3.3Semantic verb classes
- 4.Anticausativization vs. causativization
- 5.Modeling the (productivity of the) oblique anticausative construction
- 6.Summary and conclusions
- Data repository
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Author queries
Dictionaries Databases References
References (106)
Fritzner, Johan. 1886–1896. Ordbog
over det gamle norske sprog, 2nd
edn. Oslo: Feilberg & Landmarts forlag.
Norrøn
ordbok = Leiv Heggstad, Finn Hødnebø & Erik Simensen. 1990. Norrøn
Ordbog, 2nd edn. Oslo: Det Norske Samlaget.
ONP = The dictionary of Old Norse
prose. University of Copenhagen. [URL]
Berkeley Framenet. Available at [URL]
The NonCanonicalCase Database. Available
at [URL]
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2015. The
causative alternation revisited: Constraints and variation. English
Linguistics 32(1). 1–21.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer. 2006. The
properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases
of
interpretation, 187–211. Berlin: Mouton.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1990. The grammar of Icelandic verbs
in -st. In Joan Maling & Annie Zaenen (eds.), Modern
Icelandic syntax, 235–273. San Diego: Academic Press.
Arutjunova, Nina D. 1999. Jazyk i mir
čeloveka [Language and human
world]. Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.
Axel, Katrin. 2007. Studies
on Old High German syntax: Left sentence periphery, verb placement and
verb-second. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2007. The
lexical and semantic range of the ditransitive construction in the history of (North)
Germanic. Functions of
Language 14(1). 9–30.
. 2008. Productivity:
Evidence from case and argument structure in
Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2011. The
rise of dative substitution in the history of Icelandic: A Diachronic Construction Grammar
account. Lingua 121(1). 60–79.
. 2012. Predicting
the productivity of argument structure constructions. Berkeley Linguistics
Society 32(2006). 467–478.
. 2014. Syntax
and syntactic reconstruction. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The
Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 1st
edn., 343–373. London: Routledge.
. 2015. Valency
classes in Icelandic: Oblique subjects, oblique ambitransitives and the actional
passive. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency
classes in the world’s
languages, 367–416. Berlin: Mouton.
. Submitted. How
to reconstruct case and argument structure for inconsistent correspondence sets across daughter languages: The case of
‘satisfy’, ‘satiate’, ‘suffice’ and ‘be satisfied’ in Germanic.
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thórhallur Eythórsson. 2009. The
origin of the oblique subject construction: An Indo-European
comparison. In Vit Bubenik, John Hewson & Sarah Rose (eds.), Grammatical
change in Indo-European
languages, 179–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2020. How
to identify cognates in syntax: Taking Watkins’ legacy one step
further. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Spike Gildea & Eugenio R. Luján (eds.), Reconstructing
syntax, 197–238. Leiden: Brill.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Kristian E. Kristoffersen & Andreas Sveen. 2011. West-Scandinavian
ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian ‘V-REFL-NP’
construction. Linguistics 49(1). 53–104.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Leonid Kulikov, Roland Pooth & Peter Alexander Kerkhof. 2020. Oblique
anticausatives: A morphosyntactic isogloss in Indo-European. Poznan Studies in Contemporary
Linguistics 56(3). 413–449.
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thomas Smitherman. 2013. The
quest for cognates: A reconstruction of oblique subject constructions in
Proto-Indo-European. Language Dynamics and
Change 3(1). 28–67.
Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður. 2014. Oblique
anticausative in Lithuanian: A comparative
approach. Baltistica 49(1). 25–39.
Borkovskij, Viktor I. & Petr S. Kuznecov. 1963. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka [A historical grammar of
Russian]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
Cennamo, Michela, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Jóhanna Barðdal. 2015. Semantic
and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization: Evidence from Latin and Old
Norse-Icelandic. Linguistics 53(4). 677–729.
. 1985. Causative
verb-formation and other verb-deriving morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language
typology and syntactic description, Vol. 3, Grammatical categories and the
lexicon, 301–348. Cambridge: CUP.
Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. 2000. Introduction. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Yikhenvald (eds.), Changing
valency: Case studies in
transitivity, 1–29. Cambridge: CUP.
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity
and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let
alone. Language 641. 501–538.
Francis, Gill, Susan Hunston & Elizabeth Manning. 1996. Collins
COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: Harper Collins.
Fried, Mirjam. 2004. Predicate
semantics and event construal in Czech case marking. In Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Construction
grammar in a cross-language
perspective, 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Georgieva, V. L. 1978. Bezličnye
predloženija [Impersonal sentences]. In V. I. Borkovskij (ed.), Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka: Sintaksis. Prostoe predloženie [Historical grammar of Russian: Syntax; Simple
clauses], 230–295. Moskva: Nauka.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar
approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2002. Surface generalizations: An
alternative to alternations. Cognitive
Linguistics 13(4). 327–356.
2019. Explain me this: Creativity,
competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton, NJ: PUP.
Gyselinck, Emmeline. 2020. (Re)shaping
the constructional network: Modeling shifts and reorganizations in the network
hierarchy. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), 107–140.
Haider, Hubert. 2001. How
to stay accusative in Insular Germanic. Working Papers in Scandinavian
Syntax 681. 1–14.
Halldórsson, Halldór. 1965. Hjarta
drepr stall [heart takes stall] and some other Icelandic metaphorical phrases pertaining to the heart and
courage. Íslenzk
tunga 61. 38–70.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1987. Transitivity
alternations of the anticausative type. (Arbeitspapier Nr. 5, Neue
Folge). Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln.
. 1993. More
on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives
and
transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heltoft, Lars. 2012. Zero
expression of arguments in Old Danish. Acta Linguistica
Hafniensia 44(2). 169–191.
Hjartardóttir, Thóra Björk. 1987. Getið í
eyðurnar: Um eyður fyrir frumlög og andlög í eldri íslensku [Filling the
gaps: On subject and object gaps in Older
Icelandic]. Reykjavík: University of Iceland master’s thesis.
Inglese, Guglielmo. 2022. Cross-linguistic
sources of anticausative markers. Linguistic Typology at the
Crossroads 2(2). 127–186.
Johnson, Cynthia A., Peter Alexander Kerkhof, Leonid Kulikov, Esther Le Mair & Jóhanna Barðdal. 2019. Argument
structure, conceptual metaphor and semantic change: How to succeed in Indo-European without really
trying. Diachronica 36(4). 463–508.
Jónsdóttir, Margrét. 2015. From
accusative to dative (via nominative): The case of fjölga ‘increase’ and fækka ‘decrease’ in
Icelandic. In Martin Hilpert, Jan-Ola Östman, Christine Mertzlufft, Michael Riessler & Janet Duke (eds.), New
trends in Nordic and general
linguistics, 181–201. Berlin: Mouton.
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2001. Lists of quirky subject
predicates in Icelandic. Reykjavik: University of Iceland master’s thesis.
Keenan, Edward L. 1972. Relative clause formation in
Malagasy. In Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi & Gloria C. Phares (eds.), The
Chicago which hunt: Papers from the relative clause
festival, 169–189. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Kleyner, Svetlana. 2018. What
does not kill us, tears us apart: Accusative subject verbs in Russian. Paper presented at
the 51st Annual meeting of the Societas Linguistica
Europaea, Tallinn, 29 August–1 September
2018.
Kulikov, Leonid. 2001. Causatives. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language
typology and language universals: An international handbook, Vol
2, 886–898. Berlin: Mouton.
Lander, Eric T. & Liliane Haegeman. 2014. Old
Norse as an NP language: With observations on the Common Norse and Northwest Germanic runic
inscriptions. Transactions of the Philological
Society 112(3). 279–318.
Letuchiy, Alexander. 2009. Towards
a typology of labile verbs: Lability vs. derivation. In Patience Epps & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds.), New
challenges in typology: Transcending the borders and refining the
distinctions, 247–268. Berlin: Mouton.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English
verb classes and alternations: A preliminary
investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1994. A
preliminary analysis of causative verbs in
English. Lingua 921. 35–77.
Lorenz, David. 2020. Converging
variations and the emergence of horizontal links: To-contraction in American
English. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), 243–274.
Matasović, Ranko. 2013. Latin
paenitet me, miseret me, pudet me and active clause alignment in
PIE. Indogermanische
Forschungen 1181. 93–110.
Meyer, Ronny. 2022. The
noncausal/causal alternation in Muher (Ethiosemitic). Linguistique et Langues
Africaines 8(2).
Mitkovska, Liljana & Elini Bužarovska. 2012. An
alternative analysis of the English get-past participle constructions: Is get all that
passive? Journal of English
Linguistics 40(2). 196–215.
Moreno Cabrera, Juan Carlos. 1985. Anticausatives: A
typological sketch. In William H. Eilfort, Paul D. Kroeber & Karen L. Peterson (eds.), Papers
from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity at the Twenty First Regional
Meeting, 172–181. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & G. G. Sil’nickij. 1969. Tipologija
morfologičeskogo i leksičeskogo kauzativa. In Alexandr A. Xolodovič (ed.), Tipologija
kauzativnyx konstrukcij: Morfologičeskij
kauzativ, 20–50. Leningrad: Nauka.
Nichols, Johanna, David Peterson & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. Transitivising
and detransitivising languages. Linguistic
Typology 8(2). 149–211.
Ongenae, Tim A. F. 2024. Permittito aperiat
oculum: Typological considerations on P-lability and its interaction with morphosyntactic alignment in Latin
medical texts. Folia Linguistica
Historica 451. 1–35.
Ottósson, Kjartan G. 1988. A feature-based approach to
thematic roles. In Victoria Rosén (ed.), Papers
from the Tenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Bergen, June 11–13, 1987, Vol
2, 136–150. Bergen: Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, University of Bergen.
1992. The middle voice in
Icelandic. Lund: Lund University PhD dissertation.
2013. The anticausative and related
categories in the Old Germanic languages. In Folke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman (eds.), Diachronic
and typological perspectives on
verbs, 329–382. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Paducheva, Elena V. 2003. Is there an
“anticausative” component in the semantics of decausatives? Journal of Slavic
Linguistics 11(1). 173–198.
Pooth, Roland, Peter Alexander Kerkhof, Leonid Kulikov & Jóhanna Barðdal. 2019. The
origin of non-canonical case marking of subjects in Proto-Indo-European: Accusative, ergative, or semantic
alignment. Indogermanische
Forschungen 1231. 245–263.
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Miriam R. L. Petruck, Christopher R. Johnson, Collin F. Baker & Jan Scheffczyk. 2016. FrameNet
II: Extended theory and practice. Unpublished manuscript, Berkeley, CA: International Computer Science Institute.
Sandal, Catrine. 2011. Akkusative subjekt og antikausativitet i norrønt [Accusative
subjects and anticausativity in Old
Norse-Icelandic]. Bergen: University of Bergen master’s thesis.
Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The
syntax of (anti-)causatives: External arguments in change-of-state
contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives
and related constructions: A prototype
analysis. Language 61(4). 821–848.
Sigurðardóttir, Sigríður Sæunn & Thórhallur Eythórsson. 2022. The
emergence of oblique subjects: Oblique-case substitution and shift in anticausative strategy in Modern
Icelandic. Working Papers in Scandinavian
Syntax 1071. 47–82.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. 1989. Verbal syntax and case in
Icelandic. Lund: Lund University PhD dissertation.
. 2006. The Nom/Acc alternation in
Germanic. In Jutta M. Hartmann & László Molnárfi (eds.), Comparative
studies in Germanic syntax: From Afrikaans to Zurich
German, 13–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sommerer, Lotte & Elena Smirnova (eds.). 2020. Nodes
and networks in Diachronic Construction
Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Smirnova, Elena. 2021. Horizontal
links within and between paradigms: The constructional network of reported directives in
German. In Martin Hilpert & Bert Capelle (eds.), Modality
and Diachronic Construction
Grammar, 185–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Švedova, Natalija Ju. 1964. Izmenenija v
sisteme prostogo predloženija v russkom lit. jazyke XIX v. [Changes in the
system of the simple sentence in the Russian literary language of the 19th
Century]. In V. V. Vinogradov & N. Ju. Švedova (eds.), Očerki po istorii grammatiki russkogo literaturnogo jazyka XIX v. [Essays in the history of grammar of the Russian literary language of the 19th
century], 20–368. Moskva: Nauka.
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From
etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic
structure. Cambridge: CUP.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur & Thóra Björk Hjartardóttir. 1986. Pro-drop,
Topic-drop ...:Where do Old and Modern Icelandic fit in? In Östen Dahl & Anders Holmberg (eds.), Scandinavian
syntax, 150–161. Stockholm: Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.
Tubino-Blanco, Mercedes. 2020. Causative/inchoative
in morphology. Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. [URL].
Vázquez-González, Juan G. & Jóhanna Barðdal. 2019. Reconstructing
the ditransitive construction for Proto-Germanic: Gothic, Old English and Old
Norse-Icelandic. Folia Linguistica
Historica 40(2). 555–620.
Viberg, Åke. 1984. The
verbs of perception: A typological study. In Brian Butterworth, Bernard Comrie & Östen Dahl (eds.), Explanations
for language
universals, 123–162. Berlin: Mouton.
. 2008. Swedish
verbs of perception from a typological and contrastive
perspective. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González, J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Elsa M. González Álvarez (eds.), Languages
and cultures in contrast and
comparison, 123–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Viðarsson, Heimir Freyr. 2006. Breytilegt
frumlagsfall í forníslensku [Variation in case marking of subjects in Old
Icelandic]. Reykjavík: University of Iceland bachelor’s thesis.
Westvik, Olaf Jansen. 1994. On the subjects of some
nominativeless sentences in Old Germanic. In Toril Swan, Endre Mørck & Olaf Westvik (eds.), Language
change and language structure: Older Germanic languages in a comparative
perspective, 305–344. Berlin: Mouton.
Zaenen, Annie & Joan Maling. 1984. Unaccusative,
passive, and quirky case. In Mark Cobler, Susannah MacKaye & Michael T. Wescoat (eds.), Proceedings
of the Third West Coast Conference on Formal
Linguistics, 317–329. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.
Zehentner, Eva & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2020. Constructional
networks and the development of benefactive ditransitives in
English. In Lotte Sommerer & Elena Smirnova (eds.), 167–211.