References (79)
References
Bolden, Galina B. 2024. Analyzing particles. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 611–640. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 2024. Working with collections in Conversation Analysis. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 191–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2016. Conversation analysis. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca & Chase Wesley Raymond. 2018. Actions in practice: On details in collections. Discourse Studies 20(1). 90–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca, Kobin H. Kendrick, Chase Wesley Raymond, & Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2024. Jeffersonian transcription conventions. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 974–989.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Barbara A. Fox, Chase Wesley Raymond, Marja-Leena Sorjonen & Sandra A. Thompson. 2024. Studying grammar in social interaction. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick, & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 641–671.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2013. Turn design. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of Conversation Analysis, 131–149. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Epistemics in social interaction. Discourse Studies 20(1). 163–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endo, Tomoko. 2018. The Japanese change-of-state tokens a and aa in responsive units. Journal of Pragmatics 1231. 151–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 321. 429–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. 2005. Towards an understanding of the spectrum of approaches to discourse particles. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, 1–20. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. & Chase Wesley Raymond. 2025. On granularity in grammar and action. In Jakob Steensig, Maria Jørgensen, Jan Lindström, Nicholas Mikkelsen, Karita Suomalainen & Søren Sandager Sørensen (eds.), Grammar in action: Building comprehensive grammars of talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García-Ramón, Amparo. 2018. Indexing epistemic incongruence: Uy as a formal sign of disagreement in agreement sequences in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 1311. 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1978. Response cries. Language 541. 787–815. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golato, Andrea. 2010. Marking understanding versus receipting information in talk: Achso and ach in German interaction. Discourse Studies 121. 147–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. German oh: Marking an emotional change of state. Research on Language & Social Interaction 451. 245–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golato, Andrea & Emma Betz. 2008. German ach and achso in repair uptake: Resources to sustain or remove epistemic asymmetry. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 271. 7–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998. The function of discourse particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 2009. Marking a ‘noticing of departure’ in talk: Eh-prefaced turns in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 411. 2100–2129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto & Kaoru Hayano. 2018. A-prefaced responses to inquiry in Japanese. In John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds.), 193–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine & Aino Koivisto. 2016. Indicating a change-of-state in interaction: Cross-linguistic explorations. Journal of Pragmatics 1041. 83–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 299–345. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 30–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation-analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 881. 88–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Commentary: On the diversity of “changes of state” and their indices. Journal of Pragmatics 1041. 207–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018a. The ubiquity of epistemics: A rebuttal to the “epistemics of epistemics” group. Discourse Studies 20(1). 14–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. Turn-initial particles in English: The cases of Oh and Well. In John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds.), 155–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024. The epistemics of epistemics: Validating claims about epistemic stance in Conversation Analysis. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 419–451.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Chase Wesley Raymond. 2021. Preference and polarity: Epistemic stance in question design. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54(1). 39–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, Mingyang. 1981. The particles and interjections in the Beijing dialect. Studies of the Chinese Language 61. 416–423.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. An initial exploration of the Beijing Dialect. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katsiveli, Stamatina. 2020. Marking the unexpected: The case of ba in Greek talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 1701. 55–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H. 2018. Adjusting epistemic gradients: The final particle ba in Mandarin Chinese conversation. East Asian Pragmatics 31. 5–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie. 2013. Retroactive indexing of relevance: The use of well in third position. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(2). 125–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie & Satomi Kuroshima. 2013. Turn beginnings in interaction: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 571. 267–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koivisto, Aino. 2013. On the preference for remembering: Acknowledging an answer with Finnish ai nii(n) (“oh that’s right”). Research on Language and Social Interaction 461. 277–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015a. Dealing with ambiguities in informings: Finnish aijaa as a “neutral” news receipt. Research on Language and Social Interaction 481. 365–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. Displaying now-understanding: The Finnish change-of-state token aa. Discourse Processes 521. 111–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Receipting information as newsworthy vs. responding to redirection: Finnish news particles aijaa and aha(a). Journal of Pragmatics 1041. 163–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Hongyuan, Mi Tian & Shuangyun Yao. 2024. The Chinese change-of-state token o in responsive units. Lingua 3101. 103779. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Lei. 2002. An investigation of acquisition of interjections. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies 21. 24–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Pan, Pan Wenyu, & Wei Gu. 2004. Practical grammar of Modern Chinese. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luke, Kang-Kwong. 2019. Chinese Conversation Analysis: New method, new data, new insights. In Chris Shei (ed.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis, 21–35. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollner, Melvin. 1987. Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita M. 1980. Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device. Sociological Inquiry 501. 186–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qi, Huyang. 2011. On the usage of modal particles in Modern Chinese. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quan, Lihong & Jinlong Ma. 2019. A study of repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse 10(2). 158–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2018. Bueno-, pues-, and bueno-pues-prefacing in Spanish conversation. John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds.), 59–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Rebecca Clift & John Heritage. 2021. Reference without anaphora: On agency through grammar. Linguistics 59(3). 715–755. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2024. Methods in Conversation Analysis. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 3–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley & Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2024. Evidencing conversation-analytic claims: How participants orient to social action. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 315–355.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley & Anne Elizabeth Clark White. 2017. Time reference in the service of social action. Social Psychology Quarterly 80(2). 109–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2020. One type of polar, information-seeking question and its stance of probability: Implications for the preference for agreement. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53(4). 425–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D., Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.). 2025. The Cambridge handbook of methods in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 501. 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1986. The routine as achievement. Human Studies 91. 111–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shao, Jingmin & Yan Zhu. 2002. The affirmative inclination of the shi-bu-shi+VP question and its typological significance. Chinese Teaching in the World 21. 23–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Michael Sean. 2013. ‘I thought’ initiated turns: Addressing discrepancies in first-hand and second-hand knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 571. 318–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, I-Ni. 2008. Projecting the unanticipatory: The Mandarin particle Ei and its projectability in daily conversation. In Marjorie K. M. Chan & Hana Kang (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL–20), 1023–1040. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, I.-N. 2011. Grammar as situated practices: Conversational practices of two Mandarin yes/no question formats in talk-in-interaction. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA PhD dissertation.
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina. 1997. Transforming participation frameworks in multi-party Mandarin conversation: The use of discourse particles and body behavior. Issues in Applied Linguistics 8(2). 97–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Initiating repair and beyond: The use of two repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin conversation. Discourse Processes 41(1). 67–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Managing turn entry: The design of ei-prefaced turns in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 661. 139–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Doing Conversation Analysis in Mandarin Chinese: Basic methods. Chinese Language and Discourse 7(2). 179–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina & John Heritage. 2017. Particles and epistemics: Convergences and divergences between English and Mandarin. In Gene H. Lerner, Geoffrey Raymond & John Heritage (eds.), Enabling human conduct: Naturalistic studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff, 273–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Yaxin, & Shuai Yang. 2022. Power plays in action formation: The TCU-final particle ‘ba’ (吧) in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Discourse Studies 24(4). 491–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Yaxin, & Guodong Yu. 2022. Action ascription and action assessment: Ya-suffixed answers to questions in Mandarin conversation. In Arnulf Deppermann & Michael Haugh (eds.), Action ascription in social interaction, 234–255. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Guodong. 2022a. 什么是会话分析. [What is Conversation Analysis]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022b. Ai (唉) as a topic transition signal in Mandarin conversations. Journal of Foreign Languages 451. 61–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Guodong, Yaxin Wu, Paul Drew & Chase Wesley Raymond. 2024. The DIG Mandarin Conversations (DMC) Corpus: Mundane phone calls in Mandarin Chinese as resources for research and teaching. Chinese Language and Discourse 15(1). 105–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 1982. The handouts on grammar. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue