Article In: Functions of Language: Online-First Articles
The Mandarin rising-intoned Éi (诶) particle in third position
A change-of-state token marking an epistemic discrepancy
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This paper offers an analysis of rising-intoned éi in Mandarin conversation, specifically as it
is produced in the wake of question-answer sequences. Examining the particle’s use both as a stand-alone unit implementing its own
action, and as a preface to additional turn components and the actions thereby implemented, we argue that éi in
third position is best conceived of as a change-of-state token marking an epistemic discrepancy. Paralleling what has been argued
for Japanese eh, Mandarin éi flags something in the talk or environment as departing from the
speaker’s pre-existing knowledge, supposition, expectation, or orientation. In third position of a question-answer sequence, it is
the answer (produced in second position) that the éi targets and problematizes in this way, making relevant
subsequent conduct that works to resolve the discrepancy. In light of the fact that prior interactional research on Mandarin
éi has focused largely on the particle’s use in sequence-initiating actions, the paper concludes with a
discussion of three possible theoretical accounts for the apparent diversity of its interactional functions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Approaching the Mandarin particle éi (诶)
- 2.1Interactional perspectives: Topic initiation in multiparty conversation
- 2.2The present inquiry: Éi in dyadic conversation
- 3.Data and methods
- 4.Éi in third position: A change-of-state token marking an epistemic discrepancy
- 4.1Stand-alone éi
- 4.2Éi as a preface
- 5.Discussion: Accounting for a particle with multiple functions
- Notes
- Author queries
References
References (79)
Bolden, Galina B. 2024. Analyzing
particles. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 611–640.
Clayman, Steven E. 2024. Working with collections in
Conversation Analysis. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 191–216.
Clift, Rebecca & Chase Wesley Raymond. 2018. Actions
in practice: On details in collections. Discourse
Studies 20(1). 90–119.
Clift, Rebecca, Kobin H. Kendrick, Chase Wesley Raymond, & Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2024. Jeffersonian
transcription conventions. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 974–989.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Barbara A. Fox, Chase Wesley Raymond, Marja-Leena Sorjonen & Sandra A. Thompson. 2024. Studying
grammar in social interaction. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick, & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 641–671.
Drew, Paul. 2013. Turn
design. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The
handbook of Conversation Analysis, 131–149. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Endo, Tomoko. 2018. The
Japanese change-of-state tokens a and aa in responsive
units. Journal of
Pragmatics 1231. 151–166.
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The
myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive
science. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences 321. 429–492.
Fischer, Kerstin. 2005. Towards
an understanding of the spectrum of approaches to discourse
particles. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches
to discourse
particles, 1–20. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fox, Barbara A. & Chase Wesley Raymond. 2025. On
granularity in grammar and action. In Jakob Steensig, Maria Jørgensen, Jan Lindström, Nicholas Mikkelsen, Karita Suomalainen & Søren Sandager Sørensen (eds.), Grammar
in action: Building comprehensive grammars of
talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
García-Ramón, Amparo. 2018. Indexing
epistemic incongruence: Uy as a formal sign of disagreement in agreement sequences in
Spanish. Journal of
Pragmatics 1311. 1–17.
Golato, Andrea. 2010. Marking
understanding versus receipting information in talk: Achso and ach in German
interaction. Discourse
Studies 121. 147–176.
. 2012. German
oh: Marking an emotional change of state. Research on Language &
Social Interaction 451. 245–268.
Golato, Andrea & Emma Betz. 2008. German
ach and achso in repair uptake: Resources to sustain or remove epistemic
asymmetry. Zeitschrift für
Sprachwissenschaft 271. 7–37.
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998. The function of discourse
particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hayashi, Makoto. 2009. Marking
a ‘noticing of departure’ in talk: Eh-prefaced turns in Japanese
conversation. Journal of
Pragmatics 411. 2100–2129.
Hayashi, Makoto & Kaoru Hayano. 2018. A-prefaced
responses to inquiry in Japanese. In John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds.), 193–224.
Heinemann, Trine & Aino Koivisto. 2016. Indicating
a change-of-state in interaction: Cross-linguistic explorations. Journal of
Pragmatics 1041. 83–88.
Heritage, John. 1984. A
change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential
placement. In J. M. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures
of social
action, 299–345. Cambridge: CUP.
. 2012a. Epistemics
in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 45(1). 1–29.
. 2012b. The
epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 45(1). 30–52.
. 2015. Well-prefaced
turns in English conversation: A conversation-analytic perspective. Journal of
Pragmatics 881. 88–104.
. 2016. Commentary:
On the diversity of “changes of state” and their indices. Journal of
Pragmatics 1041. 207–210.
. 2018a. The
ubiquity of epistemics: A rebuttal to the “epistemics of epistemics” group. Discourse
Studies 20(1). 14–56.
. 2018b. Turn-initial
particles in English: The cases of Oh and
Well. In John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds.), 155–189.
. 2024. The
epistemics of epistemics: Validating claims about epistemic stance in Conversation
Analysis. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 419–451.
Heritage, John & Chase Wesley Raymond. 2021. Preference
and polarity: Epistemic stance in question design. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 54(1). 39–59.
Heritage, John & Marja-Leena Sorjonen. 2018. At
the intersection of turn and sequence: Turn-initial particles across
languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hu, Mingyang. 1981. The
particles and interjections in the Beijing dialect. Studies of the Chinese
Language 61. 416–423.
Katsiveli, Stamatina. 2020. Marking
the unexpected: The case of ba in Greek talk-in-interaction. Journal of
Pragmatics 1701. 55–68.
Kendrick, Kobin H. 2018. Adjusting epistemic gradients:
The final particle ba in Mandarin Chinese conversation. East Asian
Pragmatics 31. 5–26.
Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie. 2013. Retroactive indexing of
relevance: The use of well in third position. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 46(2). 125–143.
Kim, Hye Ri Stephanie & Satomi Kuroshima. 2013. Turn
beginnings in interaction: An introduction. Journal of
Pragmatics 571. 267–273.
Koivisto, Aino. 2013. On
the preference for remembering: Acknowledging an answer with Finnish ai nii(n) (“oh that’s
right”). Research on Language and Social
Interaction 461. 277–297.
. 2015a. Dealing
with ambiguities in informings: Finnish aijaa as a “neutral” news
receipt. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 481. 365–387.
. 2015b. Displaying
now-understanding: The Finnish change-of-state token aa. Discourse
Processes 521. 111–148.
. 2016. Receipting
information as newsworthy vs. responding to redirection: Finnish news particles aijaa and
aha(a). Journal of
Pragmatics 1041. 163–179.
Li, Charles & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin
Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Liu, Hongyuan, Mi Tian & Shuangyun Yao. 2024. The
Chinese change-of-state token o in responsive
units. Lingua 3101. 103779.
Liu, Lei. 2002. An
investigation of acquisition of interjections. Language Teaching and Linguistic
Studies 21. 24–28.
Liu, Pan, Pan Wenyu, & Wei Gu. 2004. Practical
grammar of Modern Chinese. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Luke, Kang-Kwong. 2019. Chinese
Conversation Analysis: New method, new data, new insights. In Chris Shei (ed.), The
Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse
analysis, 21–35. New York, NY: Routledge.
Pollner, Melvin. 1987. Mundane
reason: Reality in everyday and sociological
discourse. Cambridge: CUP.
Pomerantz, Anita M. 1980. Telling my side: “Limited
access” as a “fishing” device. Sociological
Inquiry 501. 186–198.
Quan, Lihong & Jinlong Ma. 2019. A
study of repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Chinese Language
and
Discourse 10(2). 158–186.
Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2018. Bueno-,
pues-, and bueno-pues-prefacing in Spanish conversation. John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds.), 59–96.
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Rebecca Clift & John Heritage. 2021. Reference
without anaphora: On agency through
grammar. Linguistics 59(3). 715–755.
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2024. Methods
in Conversation Analysis. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 3–48.
Raymond, Chase Wesley & Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2024. Evidencing
conversation-analytic claims: How participants orient to social
action. In Jeffrey D. Robinson, Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.), 315–355.
Raymond, Chase Wesley & Anne Elizabeth Clark White. 2017. Time
reference in the service of social action. Social Psychology
Quarterly 80(2). 109–131.
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2020. One type of polar,
information-seeking question and its stance of probability: Implications for the preference for
agreement. Research on Language and Social
Interaction 53(4). 425–442.
Robinson, Jeffrey D., Rebecca Clift, Kobin H. Kendrick & Chase Wesley Raymond (eds.). 2025. The
Cambridge handbook of methods in Conversation
Analysis. Cambridge: CUP.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A
simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for
conversation. Language 501. 696–735.
2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A
primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol.
1. Cambridge: CUP.
Shao, Jingmin & Yan Zhu. 2002. The
affirmative inclination of the shi-bu-shi+VP question and its typological
significance. Chinese Teaching in the
World 21. 23–36.
Smith, Michael Sean. 2013. ‘I thought’ initiated turns:
Addressing discrepancies in first-hand and second-hand knowledge. Journal of
Pragmatics 571. 318–330.
Tsai, I-Ni. 2008. Projecting
the unanticipatory: The Mandarin particle Ei and its projectability in daily
conversation. In Marjorie K. M. Chan & Hana Kang (eds.), Proceedings
of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics
(NACCL–20), 1023–1040. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
Tsai, I.-N. 2011. Grammar
as situated practices: Conversational practices of two Mandarin yes/no question formats in
talk-in-interaction. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA PhD dissertation.
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar
in everyday talk: Building responsive
actions. Cambridge: CUP.
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina. 1997. Transforming participation
frameworks in multi-party Mandarin conversation: The use of discourse particles and body
behavior. Issues in Applied
Linguistics 8(2). 97–117.
. 2004. Stance in talk: A Conversation
Analysis of Mandarin final particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2006. Initiating repair and
beyond: The use of two repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin conversation. Discourse
Processes 41(1). 67–109.
. 2014. Managing turn entry: The
design of ei-prefaced turns in Mandarin conversation. Journal of
Pragmatics 661. 139–161.
. 2016. Doing Conversation Analysis
in Mandarin Chinese: Basic methods. Chinese Language and
Discourse 7(2). 179–209.
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina & John Heritage. 2017. Particles
and epistemics: Convergences and divergences between English and
Mandarin. In Gene H. Lerner, Geoffrey Raymond & John Heritage (eds.), Enabling
human conduct: Naturalistic studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A.
Schegloff, 273–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wu, Yaxin, & Shuai Yang. 2022. Power
plays in action formation: The TCU-final particle ‘ba’ (吧) in Mandarin Chinese
conversation. Discourse
Studies 24(4). 491–513.
Wu, Yaxin, & Guodong Yu. 2022. Action
ascription and action assessment: Ya-suffixed answers to questions in Mandarin
conversation. In Arnulf Deppermann & Michael Haugh (eds.), Action
ascription in social
interaction, 234–255. Cambridge: CUP.
Yu, Guodong. 2022a. 什么是会话分析. [What is Conversation
Analysis]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
. 2022b. Ai
(唉) as a topic transition signal in Mandarin conversations. Journal of Foreign
Languages 451. 61–92.
Yu, Guodong, Yaxin Wu, Paul Drew & Chase Wesley Raymond. 2024. The
DIG Mandarin Conversations (DMC) Corpus: Mundane phone calls in Mandarin Chinese as resources for research and
teaching. Chinese Language and
Discourse 15(1). 105–141.