Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 31:3 (2024) ► pp.327–367
On the discourse marker yěshì ‘also’ in Chinese constructions of blame
Published online: 11 March 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24053.fan
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24053.fan
Abstract
Blame is generally considered a social-cognitive act, in which the blamer expresses their negative evaluation and attitude to the ‘blamee’ and their actions. In the act of blame, the blamer takes a stance, presents it, and negotiates this stance with other participants within the discourse. Adopting a Construction Grammar approach, this paper identifies four constructions of blame in Modern Chinese that share a construction-initial sequence ‘np yěshì’. Despite their formal similarity and the general function of expressing blame, the four constructions differ in syntax, detailed semantics, and pragmatic functions. Moreover, our analysis shows that, in interaction with the clauses that follow, construction-initial ‘np yěshì’ marks an evaluative-affective stance, mitigates the effects of blame, and signals a stance shift in the discourse. In terms of discourse organization, it serves to introduce new and relevant information in the forthcoming discourse.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and methodology
- 3.Existing accounts and limitations
- 3.1Functions of yěshì in Modern Chinese
- 3.2Review of existing accounts regarding the DM yěshì
- 3.2.1Yěshì as a topic marker
- 3.2.2Hypothesis of ellipsis
- 3.2.3Lexicalization
- 4.Theoretical assumptions
- 4.1Construction grammar
- 4.2Stance triangle
- 5.Constructions of blame marked by yěshì in Modern Chinese
- 5.1General characteristics of ‘np yěshì’
- 5.2Constructionhood of four CBs
- 5.2.1Construction A: np yěshì, con x, zěnme/zǎ/wèishénme/gànmá y?
- 5.2.2Construction B: np yěshì, (bù)gāi/bié/jiù vp (ba/bei)!
- 5.2.3Construction C: np yěshì, (jiù/piān/tài/hái) s.
- 5.2.4Construction D: np yěshì, s de/la/ma
- 5.3Functions of ‘np yěshì’ in the CBs
- 5.3.1Evaluative-affective stance
- 5.3.2Face-threat mitigator
- 5.3.3Shift from a prior stance
- 5.3.4Signal new and relevant information
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (63)
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1988. Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11(1). 1–34.
Biezma, Maria & Kyle Rawlins. 2017. Rhetorical questions: Severing asking from questioning. In Dan Burgdorf, Jacob Collard, Sireemas Maspong & Brynhildur Stefánsdóttir (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 271. 302–322.
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2007. Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31(3). 569–606.
Caponigro, Ivano & Jon Sprouse. 2007. Rhetorical questions as questions. In Louise McNally & Estela Puig-Waldmüller (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 111. 121–133.
Chen, Jiajun. 2017. Dialogicity in dialogue: Deriving Chinese discourse marker bieshuo from the negative imperative. Journal of Pragmatics 1101. 34–49.
. 2018. (Inter)subjectification at the left and right periphery: Deriving Chinese pragmatic marker bushi from the negative copula. Language Sciences 661. 83–102.
Cheng, Siu-Pong & Sze-Wing Tang. 2022. Syntax of sentence-final particles in Chinese. In Chu-Ren Huang, Yen-Hwei Lin, I-Hsuan Chen & Yu-Yin Hsu (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Chinese linguistics, 578–596. Cambridge: CUP.
Cui, Xiliang. 2024. Yanyu Xingwei Lilun Yu Yuqici De Gongneng Yiyi. ‘Speech Act Theory and the function-meaning of modal particles’. TCSOL Studies (3). 58–65.
Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fang, Hongmei & Kees Hengeveld. 2022. Sentence-final particles in Mandarin. Studia Linguistica 76(3). 873–913.
Feng, Yuan. 2012. ‘X + Yeshi (de)’ Jiegou Yanjiu. ‘A Study on the Structure X + Yeshi (de)’. Changchun: Jilin University MA Thesis.
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2004. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies 6(4). 427–448.
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hao, Ling. 2020. Hudong shijiaoxia xiandai hanyu lichang biaoda yanjiu. ‘A study of stance expression in Modern Chinese from an interactive perspective’. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2017. Equative constructions in world-wide perspective. In Yvonne Treis & Martine Vanhove (eds.), Similative and equative constructions, 9–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else?. Linguistics 51(6). 1205–1247.
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Heine, Bernd & Gunther Kaltenböck. 2021. From clause to discourse marker: on the development of comment clauses. Language Sciences 871. 1–16.
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long. 2021. On the rise of discourse markers. In Alexander Haselow & Sylvie Hancil (eds.), Studies at the grammar-discourse interface: Discourse markers and discourse-related grammatical phenomena, 23–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Henkelmann, Peter. 2006. Constructions of equative comparison. Language Typology and Universals (STUF) 59(4). 370–398.
Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hu, Yanshan. 2016. ‘X Yeshi (de)’ Yanyu — Jianyu ‘(X) Zhenshi (de)’ Bijiao Yanjiu. ‘The study of X Yeshi (de) — also makes a comparison with X Zhenshi (de)’. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University MA thesis.
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Foong Ha Yap. 2015. Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages. Journal of Pragmatics 831. 1–9.
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. 2005. Dramatized discourse: The Mandarin Chinese ba-construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2022. Sentence-final particles: Sociolinguistic and discourse perspectives. In Chu-Ren Huang, Yen-Hwei Lin, I-Hsuan Chen & Yu-Yin Hsu (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Chinese linguistics, 597–615. Cambridge: CUP.
Lang, Jun. 2018. “I am not criticizing you”: A constructionist analysis of an indirect speech act. Chinese Language and Discourse 9(2). 184–208.
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1989. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Li, Zongjiang. 1997. ‘Ye’ De Laiyuan Jiqi Dui ‘Yi’ De Lishi Tihuan. ‘The origin of ye and its historical replacement of yi’. Studies in Language and Linguistics (2). 60–67.
Li, Zhiping. 2012. Biaotai Yu ‘Yeshi’ De Gongneng Leixing Jiqi Yanbian Licheng. ‘Functions and evolution of Yeshi [也是]’. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (61). 89–94.
Liu, Danqing. 2020. Cong Yuyan Leixingxue Dao Yuyan Kucang Leixingxue. ‘From linguistic typology to linguistic inventorial typology’. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Liu, Danqing & Xü Liejiong. 2007. Huati De Jiegou Yu Gongneng. ‘Topic: Structural and functional analysis’. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
Liu, Zhifu & Li Lijuan. 2013. Biaoshi Zeyuan De ‘X Yeshi (De)’. ‘X Yeshi (De) used for complaint’. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (6). 81–88.
Long, Haiping. 2017. Hanyu Tuicexing ‘Wo Kan’ De Xingcheng. ‘On the formation of the conjuring Wo Kan in Modern Chinese’. Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 41(6). 111–115, 119.
Lu, Fangzhe. 2017. Xiandai hanyu fanyuqi biaoji yanjiu. ‘A study on the counter-expectation markers in Modern Chinese’. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
Lü, Shuxiang. 2007. Xiandai Hanyu Babaici (Zengding Ben). ‘Eight-hundred words of Modern Chinese (revised and enlarged edition)’. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Malle, Bertram F., Steve Guglielmo & Andrew E. Monroe. 2014. A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry 25(2). 147–186.
Pan, Xianjun. 2022. Hudong Huayu Biaoji ‘Qiao Ni Shuo De’: Cong Fouding Neirong Dao Fouding Qinggan. ‘Interactive discourse marker Qiao Ni Shuo De: From negation of content to negation of emotion’. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (31). 68–78.
Pons Bordería, Salvador & Maria Estellés Arguedas. 2009. Expressing digression linguistically: Do digressive markers exist? Journal of Pragmatics 411. 921–936.
Sakita, Tomoko I. 2013. Discourse markers as stance markers: Well in stance alignment in conversational interaction. Pragmatics & Cognition 21(1). 81–116.
Schwenter, Scott A. 2003. No and tampoco: A pragmatic distinction in Spanish negation. Journal of Pragmatics 351. 999–1030.
Schwenter, Scott A. & Richard Waltereit. 2010. Presupposition accommodation and language change. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 75–102. Berlin: Mouton.
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. “Object complements” and conversation: towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1). 125–163.
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2020. Expressions of stance-to-text: discourse management markers as stance markers. Language Sciences 821. 1–14.
Traugott, Elizabeth. C. 2022. Discourse structuring markers in English. A historical constructionalist perspective on pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: OUP.
Wallace, R. Jay. 1994. Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Xü, Jiajin. 2015. Discourse markers. In Rint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics (vol. 2), 95–99. Leiden: Brill.
Xü, Jingning. 2022. Xiandai Hanyu Huayu Qingtai Yanjiu (Xiuding Ben). ‘A study of modality in discourse in Mandarin Chinese (revised edn.)’. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
Zhan, Fangqiong & Sun Chaofen. 2013. A copula analysis of shì in the Chinese cleft construction. Language and Linguistics 141. 755–788.
Zhan, Fangqiong & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2015. The constructionalization of the Chinese cleft construction. Studies in Language 39(2). 459–491.
Zhou, Minghua. 2019. ‘Yeshi’ he ‘X Yeshi (de)’ Jiegou De Duo Jiaodu Yanjiu. ‘A multi-angle research of Yeshi and the structure of X Yeshi (de)’. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University MA thesis.
