Cover not available

Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 24:2 (2017) ► pp.139–165

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The modification of compound nouns by three adjectives

 | University of Hamburg
Published online: 10 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24.2.01ber
Abstract
This paper is the final instalment in a series of studies investigating the modification patterns in complex noun phrases (NPs) in English. It particularly focuses on the modification of two-noun compounds by three attributive adjectives. An analysis of all such NPs from the BNC reveals a strong preference for head modification over modifier modification, similar rates of convergent and divergent modification and the non-occurrence of crossed modification. The single most important factor influencing the modification patterns is functional status. The larger the number of adjectives modifying the head of the compound, the higher the frequency of the modification type (modulo a proximity effect). The absence of crossed modification is expected under the no-crossing constraint, which is understood here not as a formal but as a functional principle ensuring successful communication. The various factors can be tied together under the rubric of accessibility. The probability of selecting a particular modification target is argued to be a function of the accessibility of the nouns in an NP.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Survey of logically possible modification types
  • 3.Predictions
  • 4.Data sampling
  • 5.Data analysis
    • 5.1An analysis of triple-adjective NPs
    • 5.2Comparison with double-adjective NPs
  • 6.Theoretical discussion
    • 6.1Function and proximity
    • 6.2The no-crossing constraint
    • 6.3The communicative perspective
  • 7.Ever more complex cases
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (37)
References
Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman. 2004. Beyond morphology. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alegre, María A. & Peter Gordon. 1996. Red rats eater exposes recursion in children’s word formation. Cognition 601. 65–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 241. 65–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1978. The grammar of nominal compounding. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax: Band 4: Wortstellung. Periodenbau. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Melanie J. 2011. At the boundary of morphology and syntax: Noun noun constructions in English. In Alexandra Galeni, Glyn Hicks & George Tsoulas (eds.), Morphology and its interfaces, 137–167. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belnap, R. Kirk. 1999. A new perspective on the history of Arabic variation in marking agreement with plural heads. Folia Linguistica 331. 169–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berg, Thomas. 2011. The modification of compounds by attributive adjectives. Language Sciences 331. 725–737. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. How nominal compounds are modified by two adjectives. Folia Linguistica 481. 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berg, Thomas, Sabine Helmer, Marion Neubauer & Arne Lohmann. 2012. Determinants of the extent of compound use: A contrastive analysis. Linguistics 501. 269–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, Kathryn. 1987. An effect of the accessibility of word forms on sentence structures. Journal of Memory and Language 261. 119–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew. 2008. Constituent structure. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, John M. 1979. Complex nominals: phrasal embedding in lexical structure. Linguistics 171. 863–877. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christianson, Kiel & Fernanda Ferreira. 2005. Conceptual accessibility and sentence production in a free word order language (Odawa). Cognition 981. 105–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curzan, Anne. 2003. Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, Matthew H., William D. Marslen-Wilson & M. Gareth Gaskell. 2002. Leading up the lexical garden path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 281. 218–244.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gagné, Christina. 2001. Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 271. 236–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 681. 1–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976. An overview of autosegmental phonology. Linguistic Analysis 21. 23–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1986. A comparative typology of English and German: Unifying the contrasts. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henson, Richard N. A., Dennis G. Norris, Michael P. A. Page & Alan D. Baddeley. 1996. Unchained memory: Error patterns rule out chaining models of immediate serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49(A). 80–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isel, Frédéric, Thomas C. Gunter & Angela D. Friederici. 2003. Prosody-assisted head-driven access to spoken German compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 291. 277–288.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 81. 63–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koester, Dirk, Thomas C. Gunter, Susanne Wagner & Angela D. Friederici. 2004. Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: The auditory processing of German nominal compounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 161. 1647–1668. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 1991. Promise and the theory of control. Linguistic Inquiry 221. 103–139.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Libben, Gary, Martha Gibson, Yeo Bom Yoon & Dominiek Sandra. 2003. Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language 841. 50–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark & Richard Sproat. 1992. The stress and structure of modified noun phrases in English. In Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical matters, 131–181. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing morphology. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, Maryellen C., Neal J. Perlmutter & Mark S. Seidenberg. 1994. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 1011. 676–703. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marelli, Marco, Davide Crepaldi & Claudio Luzzatti. 2009. Head position and the mental representation of nominal compounds. The Mental Lexicon 41. 430–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakayama, Masataka & Satoru Saito. 2014. Within-word serial order control: Adjacent mora exchange and serial position effects in repeated single-word production. Cognition 1311. 415–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, Martin J. & Matthew J. Traxler. 1998. Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 271. 940–961.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prat-Sala, Mercè & Holly P. Branigan. 2000. Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language 421. 168–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1973. The Penthouse Principle and the order of constituents. In Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds.), Papers from the 9th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 397–422. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slattery, Timothy J., Patrick Sturt, Kiel Christianson, Masaya Yoshida & Fernanda Ferreira. 2013. Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language 691. 104–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory, Richard Sproat & Gail McKoon. 1991. A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands. Language 671. 439–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Pienie. 1994. The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes 91. 341–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue