Cover not available

Article published In: Stance, resonance and the power of engagement
Edited by Bracha Nir and Elisabeth Zima
[Functions of Language 24:1] 2017
► pp. 94–120

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Resonance as a resource for stance-taking in narratives

 | University of Haifa
Published online: 4 September 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24.1.05nir
Abstract
This paper traces the recurrence and manipulation of devices in monologic narrative texts produced by university students based on a semi-structured elicitation. It focuses on a detailed analysis of multiple texts produced by different speaker-writers of Hebrew, to illustrate the function of structural resonance of both clauses and combinations of clauses (Clause Packages). The analyses show that while lexical devices reflect a more distanced (less evaluative) discourse stance ( (ed.) 2005. Developing discourse stance across adolescence. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 37(2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), the use of creative resonance ( 2014. Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 359–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) between syntactic structures can either enhance or undermine the narrator’s own explicit perspective on events. Stance is thus not only highlighted by resonance in monologic texts (Sakita this issue); in fact, stance is engaged with in a way that is very similar to what has been illustrated for dialogue (Dori-Hacohen this issue; Dutra this issue; Nir & Zima this issue). It is suggested that the power of this engagement can be fully assessed only if lexical and syntactic resonance are systematically analyzed.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Resources for stance-taking in discourse
    • 1.2Narrative discourse stance
  • 2.Resonance and stance-taking in monologic narratives
    • 2.1Alignment and dis-alignment in monologic narratives
  • 3.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (71)
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and social relations. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anward, Jan. 2004. Lexeme recycled: How categories emerge from interaction. Logos and Language 5(2). 31–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla. 1993. Dialogic repetition. Dialoganalyse IV1. 285–294.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Redundancy, repetition, and intensity in discourse. Language Sciences 33(2). 243–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. 1986. Repetition and recurrence. Unpublished manuscript. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Narrative theory and narrative development: The Labovian impact. Journal of Narrative and Life History 71. 235–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.) 2005. Developing discourse stance across adolescence. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 37(2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Bracha Nir-Sagiv. 2004. Linguistic indicators of inter-genre differentiation in later language development. Journal of Child Language 311. 339–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes 431. 79–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Bracha Nir-Sagiv. 2009. Clause-packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Seyda Özçalişkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan I. Slobin, 149–162. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A., Hrafnhildur Ragnarsdóttir & Sven Strömqvist. 2002. Discourse stance. Written Language and Literacy 5(2). 255–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Dan I. Slobin. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brewer, William F. & Edward H. Lichtenstein. 1982. Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics 6(5). 473–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brȏne, Gert & Elisabeth Zima. 2014. Towards a dialogic construction grammar: Ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 457–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome. 1986. Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1999. Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech. In Wolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk & Eija Ventola (eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse: How to create it and how to describe it, 11–32. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 359–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
In prep. Reasons to resonate: Motivating Dialogic Syntax.
Du Bois, John W., R. Peter Hobson & Jessica A. Hobson. 2014. Dialogic resonance and intersubjective engagement in autism. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 411–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. & Rachel Giora. 2014. Dialogic Resonance: Activating affinities across utterances. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 351–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne & J. R. Martin. 1997. Genres and registers of discourse. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as structure and process, 239–256. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Facchinetti, Roberta, Frank R. Palmer & Manfred G. Krug. (eds.). 2003. Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Allen D. 2003. Genres, registers, and contexts of discourse. In Arthur C. Graesser, Morton Ann Gernsbacher & Susan R. Goldman (eds.), Handbook of discourse processes, 25–82. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, John & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.). 1988. Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermans, Hubert J.M. & Thorsten Gieser (eds.). 2011. Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinds, John. 1979. Organizational patterns in discourse. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics: Discourse and syntax, 135–158. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2010. Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle. 1956. Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (ed.). 1994. Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives, Volume 11. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. 2005. Norms of sociocultural meaning in language: Indexicality, stance, and cultural models. In Scott F. Kiesling & Christina B. Paulston (eds.), Intercultural discourse and communication: The essential readings, 92–104. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the inner city. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Some further steps in narrative history. Journal of Narrative and Life History 71. 394–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In June Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites, Volume 11. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lempert, Michael. 2008. The poetics of stance: Text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. Language in Society 37(4). 569–592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E. 1983. The grammar of discourse. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Bracha Nir. 2014. Complementation in linear and dialogic syntax: The case of Hebrew divergently aligned discourse. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 523–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nir, Bracha. 2008. Clause packages as constructions in developing narrative discourse. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University PhD thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nir, Bracha & Ruth A. Berman. 2010. Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics 42(3). 744–765. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nir, Bracha, Gonen Dori-Hacohen & Yael Maschler. 2014. Formulations on Israeli political talk radio: From actions and sequences to stance via dialogic resonance. Discourse Studies 16(4). 534–571. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 1987. Functions of repetition in conversation. Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 7(3). 245–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Repetition as a conversational joking strategy. Advances in Discourse Processes 481. 15–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Conversational storytelling. In David Herman (ed.), The Cambridge companion to narrative, 127–141. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perrin, Laurent, Denise Deshaies & Claude Paradis. 2003. Pragmatic functions of local diaphonic repetitions in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35(12). 1843–1860. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Maxwell J. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 79–112. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rauniomaa, Mirka. 2008. Recovery through repetition. Oulu: University of Oulu PhD thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1984. Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 221. 779–809.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. From text to meaning: strategies of evaluation. In Yeshayahu Shen (ed.), Cognitive aspects of narrative structure, 4–37. Tel Aviv: Porter Institute [in Hebrew].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riloff, Ellen & Janyce Wiebe. 2003. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, 105–112. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1981. Tense variation in narrative. Language 57(1). 45–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siromaa, Maarit. 2012. Resonance in conversational second stories: A dialogic resource for stance-taking. Text & Talk 4(4). 525–545Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard. 1999. Genres of discourse and the definition of literature. Discourse Processes 281. 109–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Takanashi, Hiroko. 2000. Stance differential in parallelism: Dialogic syntax of argumentation in Japanese. In Pragmatics: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, 570–582.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1982. Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language 581. 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Repetition in conversation: Towards a poetics of talk. Language 63(3). 574–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Susan. 1994. Aspects of cohesion in monologue. Applied Linguistics 15(1). 58–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Susan Hunston (eds.). 2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2001. Subordination and discourse segmentation revisited, or: Why matrix clauses may be more dependent than complements. In Ted Sanders, Joost Schilperoord & Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and psychological aspects, 337–357. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija & Helena Halmari. 2005. Persuasion across genres: Emerging perspectives. In Helena Halmari & Tuija Virtanen (eds.), Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach, 3–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth, Gert Brȏne, Kurt Feyaerts & Paul Sambre. 2009. Ce n’est pas tres beau ce que vous avez dit! Resonance activation in French parliamentary debates. Discours 41. [URL].
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

PÕLDVERE, NELE, VICTORIA JOHANSSON & CARITA PARADIS
2021. Resonance in dialogue: the interplay between intersubjective motivations and cognitive facilitation. Language and Cognition 13:4 ► pp. 643 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue