Article published In: Stance, resonance and the power of engagement
Edited by Bracha Nir and Elisabeth Zima
[Functions of Language 24:1] 2017
► pp. 41–64
Parallelisms and affectivity in the negotiation of optimal social proximity
Examples from Brazilian Portuguese
Published online: 4 September 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24.1.03dut
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24.1.03dut
Abstract
This paper explores the ways in which speakers exchange information about themselves, and the world around them, in order to create
an optimal social space in which interaction and engagement may be successfully accomplished. Success, in turn, the paper argues,
depends on speakers making communicative gestures that involve the expression of certain aspects of their inner world: their
preferences, attitudes, interests, beliefs, characterizations, points of view, values, assessments, likes, dislikes, and related
notions that are rooted in how they feel about the world. Drawing from multi-party conversational data, the paper argues that
resonance is one of the most productive outlets for the construction of ordinary evaluative/emotive stances. In fact, it is
through the social practice of resonance itself that the amorphous and subtle nature of affect and emotions takes shape. The
utterances that are selected for resonance, the subsequent resonant patterns, and the frequency in which the pattern is reproduced
in order to secure the intended meaning are also briefly addressed in the paper.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Toward a resolution of the tension between the general and the particular
- 3.Ordinary complexity in dialogicality
- 4.Concluding remarks
- Notes
References
References (19)
Alba-Juez, Laura & Geoff Thompson. 2014. The many faces and phases of evaluation. In Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), Evaluation in context, 3–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Berube, Margery S. 1996. The American heritage book of English usage: A practical and authoritative guide to contemporary English. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
de Almeida, Napoleão Mendes. 1979. Gramática metódica da língua portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Saraiva.
Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Du Bois, John W. & Elise Kärkkäinen. 2012. Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk 41. 433–451.
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming & Danae Paolino. 1992. Discourse transcription: Santa Barbara papers in Linguistic Vol.41. Santa Barbara, CA, University of California Press.
. 1993. Outline of Discourse Transcription. In Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research, 45–89. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Englebretson, Robert. 2007. Stancetaking in discourse: An introduction. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 1–25. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie Goodwin. 1992. Assessment and the construction of context. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 147–189. Cambridge: CUP.
Hunston, Susan & Geoff Thompson. 2000. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP.
Lerner, Gene. 2002. Turnsharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox & Sandra Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 225–256. Oxford: OUP.
