Cover not available

Article published In: Stance, resonance and the power of engagement
Edited by Bracha Nir and Elisabeth Zima
[Functions of Language 24:1] 2017
► pp. 3–15

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The power of engagement

Stance-taking, dialogic resonance and the construction of intersubjectivity

 | University of Haifa
 | University of Freiburg
Published online: 4 September 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24.1.01nir
Article outline
  • 1.Engagement in interaction and in language
  • 2.What more can we learn about stance-taking and resonance?
  • Notes
  • References
References (36)
References
Anward, Jan. 2003. Lexemes recycled. How categories emerge from interaction. Logos and Language 21. 31–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poeticsEdited and translated by Caryl Emerson. Introduction by Wayne C. Booth. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Theory and History of Literature 8). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. 2005. Introduction: Developing discourse stance in different text types and languages. Journal of Pragmatics 37(2). 105–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brône, Geert & Elisabeth Zima. 2014. Towards a dialogic construction grammar: A corpus-based approach to ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 457–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1993 Mechanisms for the creation of grammar. In Eve V. Clark (ed.), The proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual child language research forum, 16–21. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1998. Discourse and grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (Vol. 21), 47–87. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Co-opting intersubjectivity: Dialogic rhetoric of the self. In Christian Meyer & Felix Girke (eds.), The rhetorical emergence of culture, 52–83. Oxford, NY: Berghahn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Towards a Dialogic Syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 359–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
In prep. Reasons to resonate: Motivating Dialogic Syntax.
Du Bois, John W. & Rachel Giora. 2014. From cognitive-functional linguistics to dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 351–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara Fox & Sandra Thompson (eds.). 2002. The language of turns and sequences. New York, NY: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goutsos, Dionysis. 1997. Modeling discourse topic: Sequential relations and strategies in expository text. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haddington, Pentti. 2006. The organization of gaze and assessments as resources for stance-taking. Text & Talk 26(3). 281–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Positioning and alignment as activities of stance taking in news interviews. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: The intersubjectivity of interaction, 283–317. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermans, Hubert J. M. & Thorsten Gieser. 2012. History, main tenets and core concepts of Dialogical Self theory. In Hubert Hermans & Thorsten Gieser (eds.), Handbook of Dialogical Self theory, 1–22. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobson, R. Peter, Jessica Hobson, Rosa García-Pérez & John W. Du Bois. 2012. Dialogic linkage and resonance in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 42(12). 2718–2728. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holquist, Michael. 1983. Answering as authoring: Mikhail Bakhtin’s trans–linguistics. Critical Inquiry 10(2). 307–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1987. Emergent grammar. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 139–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2006. Epistemic stance in English conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marková, Ivana. 2003. Constitution of the self: Intersubjectivity and dialogicality. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Newsletter, IEEE 9(3). 249–259.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Bracha Nir. 2014. Complementation in linear and dialogic syntax: The case of Hebrew divergently aligned discourse. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 523–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2002[1945]. Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nir, Bracha, Gonen Dori-Hacohen & Yael Maschler. 2014. Formulations on Israeli political talk radio: From actions and sequences to stance via dialogic resonance. Discourse Studies 16(4). 534–571. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal. 2001. Discourse markers in oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 849–878. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Discourse markers as stance markers. Pragmatics & Cognition 21(1). 81–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Language in Society 21(4). 683–687.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siromaa, Maarit. 2012. Resonance in conversational second stories: A dialogic resource for stance taking. Text & Talk 32(4). 525–545. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth. 2013a. Kognition in der Interaktion: Eine kognitiv-linguistische und gesprächsanalytische Studie dialogischer Resonanz in österreichischen Parlamentsdebatten. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth, Geert Brône, Kurt Feyaerts & Paul Sambre 2009. “Ce n’est pas très beau ce que vous avez dit”. Resonance activation in French parliamentary debates. Discours 41. Available online at [URL].
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Willis, Max, Greta Adamo & Giancarlo Guizzardi
2026. Group Modelling as Discourse: Games, Play, Ontologies and the Emergence of Shared Understandings. In Conceptual Modeling [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 16189], ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Andries, Fien, Katharina Meissl, Clarissa de Vries, Kurt Feyaerts, Bert Oben, Paul Sambre, Myriam Vermeerbergen & Geert Brône
2023. Multimodal stance-taking in interaction—A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
PÕLDVERE, NELE, VICTORIA JOHANSSON & CARITA PARADIS
2021. Resonance in dialogue: the interplay between intersubjective motivations and cognitive facilitation. Language and Cognition 13:4 ► pp. 643 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther, María José López-Couso & Belén Méndez-Naya
2020. The dynamics of stance constructions. Language Sciences 82 ► pp. 101330 ff. DOI logo
Myskow, Gordon
2018. A framework for analyzing evaluative language in historical discourse. Functions of Language 25:3 ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue