Cover not available

Review published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 23:3 (2016) ► pp.384–390

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Nancy Bell. We are not amused. Failed humor in interaction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2015. vii + 184 pp. ISBN 978 1 5015 1052 6

Reviewed by
 | University of Bergen
Published online: 16 February 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.3.05ste
References (20)
References
Bell, Nancy. 2009a. Impolite responses to failed humor. In Delia Chiaro & Neal Norrick (eds.), Humor in interaction, 143–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. Responses to failed humor. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 1825–1836. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Responses to incomprehensible humor. Journal of Pragmatics 71. 176–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Nancy & Salvatore Attardo. 2010. Failed humor: Issues in non-native speakers’ appreciation and understanding of humor. Intercultural Pragmatics 71. 423–447. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. [1900] 2008. Laughter: An essay on the meaning of the comic. Rockville, MD: Arc Manor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carrell, Amy. 1997. Joke competence and humor competence. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 10(2). 173–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 2001. The pragmatics of humor support. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 14(1). 55–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinnenkamp, Volker. 2001. Constructing misunderstanding as a cultural event. In Aldo di Luzio, Susanne Günther & Franca Orletti (eds.), Culture in communication: Analyses of intercultural situations, 211–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1840. Human nature. Available online at [URL]
Kramer, Elise. 2011. The playful is political: The metapragmatics of internet rape-joke arguments. Language in Society 401. 137–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lockyer, Sharon & Michael Pickering. 2001. Dear shit-shovellers: Humour, censure and the discourse of complaints. Discourse and Society 121. 633–651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Jerry. 1994. Taking humour seriously. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Priego-Valverde, Beatrice. 2009. Failed humor in conversation: A double-voicing analysis. In Delia Chiaro & Neal Norrick (eds.), Humor in interaction, 165–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Izchak & Sharon Hurvitz. 2008. The structure of misunderstandings. Pragmatics and Cognition 16(3). 568–585. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 1999. Misunderstanding: The standard case. Journal of Pragmatics 311. 763–785. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1988. The bulge: A theory of speech behavior and social distance. In Jonathan Fine (ed.), Second language discourse: A textbook of current research, 21–38. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue