Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 23:3 (2016) ► pp.361–383
Impersonal clauses in Chinese
Published online: 16 February 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.3.04wan
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.3.04wan
This article deals with impersonal clauses in Chinese (ICiCs) (e.g. Táishàng chàngzhe xì, 台上唱着戏). These are called pseudo-existentials in the literature, as they resemble typical existentials both in form and in meaning. I argue that ICiCs are impersonal, ergatively oriented, and existential. They are impersonal in that the actor of the process is typically demoted to the end position or completely omitted; ergatively oriented in that they express the meaning of happening instead of doing, and existential in that they present the existence of events with reference to some location realized by the initial locative nominal group. These three semantic aspects are in tune with each other and are realized by the structure NGL ^ VG ^ NG, in which VG ^ NG constitutes the event, whose existence is expressed through its configuration with the initial NGL.
References (34)
Abraham, Werner & Elisabeth Leiss. 2006. Personal and impersonal passive: Definite vs. indefinite diathesis. Transactions of the Philological Society 104 (2). 259–296.
Afonso, Susana. 2008. Existentials as impersonalizing devices: The case of European Portuguese. Transactions of the Philological Society 106(2). 180–215.
Cáo, Bóhán. 1956. Zhǔyǔ bīnyǔ wèntí suígǎn (‘Reflections on the issue of subject and object’). In Editorial Board of Chinese Language (eds.), Hànyǔ-de Zhǔyǔ Bīnyǔ Wèntí (‘The Issue of Subject and Object in Chinese’), 192–198. Beijing: Zhōnghuá Shūjú.
Davidse, Kristin. 1992. Transitivity/Ergativity: The Janus-headed grammar of actions and events. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 105–135. London: Pinter.
. 1998. On transitivity and ergativity in English, or on the need for dialogue between schools. In Johan van der Auwera, Frank Durieux, & Ludo Lejeune (eds.), English as a human language: To honour Louis Goossens, 3–26. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Fan, Fanglian. 1963. Cúnzàijù (‘Existential sentences’). Zhōngguó Yǔwén (‘Chinese Language’) 51. 386–393.
Fù, Zǐdōng. 1956. Zhǔcí hé bīncí (‘Subject and object’). In Editorial Board of Chinese Language (eds.), Hànyǔ-de Zhǔyǔ Bīnyǔ Wèntí (‘The Issue of Subject and Object in Chinese’), 76–96. Beijing: Zhōnghuá Shūjú.
Guo, Jimao. 1990. Lǐngzhǔshǔbīnjù (‘Sentences with possessor as subject and possessum as object’). Zhōngguó Yǔwén (‘Chinese Language’) 11. 24–29.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1968. Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 3. Journal of Linguistics 41. 179–215.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol.2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Malchukov, Andrej & Akio Ogawa. 2011. Towards a typology of impersonal constructions: A semantic map approach. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 19–56. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Pan, Haihua & Jingquan Han. 2005. Xiǎnxìng fēibīngé dòngcí jiégòude jùfǎ yánjiū (‘The Syntax of Surface Unaccusative Constructions’). Yǔyán Yánjiū (‘Language Research’) 31. 1–13.
Ren, Ying. 2009. Cóng gàiniànde guānlián dào gòushì-de guānlián: Yě cóng Wáng Miǎn sǐle fùqīnde shēngchéng fāngshì shuōqǐ (‘How the sentence ‘Wáng Miǎn sǐ-le fùqīn’ is generated: From the correlation of concepts to that of constructions’).
Shìjiè Hànyǔ Jiāoxué
(‘Chinese Teaching in the World’) 31. 308–321.
Shi, Yuzhi. 2007. Yǔyánxué jiǎshèzhōngde zhèngjù wèntí (‘On evidence of linguistic hypothesis’). Yǔyán Kēxué (‘Linguistic Sciences’) 41. 39–51.
Siewierska, Anna. 2008. Introduction: Impersonalization from a subject-centred vs. agent-centred perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society 106(2). 115–137.
Song, Yuzhu. 2007. Xiàndài Hànyǔ Cúnzàijù (‘Existential sentences in Modern Chinese’): Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.
Wang, Yong & Jie Xue. 2010. Hànyǔ cúnzàijùde gòushì yǔfǎ yánjiū (‘A Construction Grammar study of the Chinese existential sentence’). Yǔyán Yánjiū (‘Language Research’) 31. 62–70.
. 2013. A systemic typology of possessive and existential constructions. Functions of Language 20(1). 1–30.
Wang, Yong & Yingfang Zhou. 2011. Cúnzàijù zhǔyǔ de lèixíngxué yánjiū (‘A typological study of the subject in the existential construction’). Wàiyǔ Jiàoxué yǔ Yánjiū (‘Foreign Language Teaching and Research’) 21. 163–182.
. 2014a. Xiàndài hànyǔ zhōngde shìjiànlèi cúnzàijù (‘Event-existentials in Modern Chinese’). Wàiguóyǔ ( ‘Journal of Foreign Languages’) 31. 71–82.
Xu, Jie. 1999. Liǎngzhǒng bǎoliú bīnyǔ jùshì jí xiāngguān jùfǎ lǐlùn wèntí (‘Some theoretical issues of the two types of Chinese retained-object construction’). Dāngdài Yǔyánxué (‘Contemporary Linguistics’) 11. 16–29.
Yamamoto, Mutsumi. 2006. Agency and impersonality: Their linguistic and cultural manifestations. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Yi, Yan & Anna Siewierska. 2011. Referential impersonal constructions in Mandarin. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 547–580. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Xiang, Dajun
Xiang, Dajun
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
