Cover not available

Article published In: The Structure of the English NP: Synchronic and diachronic explorations
Edited by Kristin Davidse
[Functions of Language 23:1] 2016
► pp. 120–141

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

(A few) psycholinguistic properties of the NP

 | University of Santiago de Compostela
Published online: 16 June 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.1.01acu
Essentially, noun phrases are beams of formal features, like case or arbitrary gender, and semantic features, like number, animacy, or biologically-based gender. This means that when such nominal elements are embedded in the structure of the sentence, their features interact with that structure in many ways. The main purpose of this work is to explore some of those interactions psycholinguistically, as well as to provide a set of explanatory principles that account for a substantial number of results reported in the psycholinguistic literature. It will focus mostly on agreement. Towards that goal, firstly a distinction will be made between the storing of nominal features and the computation of those features; secondly a comparison of the features of number and gender will be made; thirdly, it will be seen how the processing and the production of featural information interacts with the strength of a language’s morphological component; fourthly, the cross-linguistically different degrees of semantic interfacing (such as agreement ad sensum) will also be seen to correlate with morphological strength; finally, it will be argued that processing systems behave quite opportunistically when it comes to using either the formal information or the conceptual information coded in their NPs. This opportunism very often translates into a timing strategy: use first whatever information is available first.
References (56)
Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos. 2009. The psycholinguistics of agreement in English and Spanish: A tutorial overview. Lingua 1191. 389–424. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Agreement, attraction and architectural opportunism. Journal of Linguistics 48(2). 257–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos, Isabel Fraga, Javier García-Orza & Ana Piñeiro. 2009. Animacy in the adjunction of Spanish RCs to complex NPs. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 211. 1137–1165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos, Manuel Carreiras & Enrique Meseguer. 2014. Gender and number agreement in comprehension in Spanish. Lingua 1431. 108–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antón-Méndez, Inez, Janet Nicol & Merrill Garrett. 2002. The relation between gender and number agreement processing. Syntax 5(1). 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Badecker, William & Frantisek Kuminiak. 2007. Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production: Evidence from gender and case in Slovak. Journal of Memory and Language 561. 65–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Elisabeth & Brian MacWhinney. 1989. Functionalism and the competition model. In Brian MacWhinney & Elisabeth Bates (eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing, 1–73. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berg, Thomas. 1998. The resolution of number agreement conflicts in English and German agreement patterns. Linguistics 361. 41–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, Kathryn, Manuel Carreiras & Enrique Meseguer. 2012. Number meaning and number grammar. Language and Cognitive Processes 26(4/5/6). 509–529.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, Kathryn & Kathleen Eberhard. 1993. Meaning, sound, and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 81. 57–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, Kathryn & Carol A. Miller. 1991. Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology 231. 45–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte. 2003. Measure noun constructions: An instance of semantically-driven grammaticalization. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 283–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briggs, Pamela & Geoffrey Underwood. 1982. Phonological coding in good and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 341. 93–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cacciari, Cristina, Manuel Carreiras & Cristina B. Cionini. 1997. When words have two genders: Anaphor resolution for Italian functionally ambiguous words. Journal of Memory and Language 371. 517–532. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cacciari, Cristina, Paola Corradini, Roberto Padovani & Manuel Carreiras. 2011. Pronoun resolution in Italian: The role of grammatical gender and context. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 23(4). 416–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caramazza, Alfonso, Michele Miozzo, Albert Costa, Niels Schiller & F.-Xavier Alario. 2001. A cross-linguistic investigation of determiner production. In Emmanuel Dupoux (ed.), Language, brain and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler, 208–226. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carminati, Maria Nella. 2005. Processing reflexes of the Feature Hierarchy and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua 1151. 259–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carreiras, Manuel & Charles Clifton. 1999. Another word on parsing relative clauses: Eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English. Memory and Cognition 271. 826–833. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 1991.Gender. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Number. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1988. Agreement vs. case marking and direct objects. In Michael Barlow & Charles Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in natural language, 151–180. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuetos, Fernado & Don Mitchell. 1988. Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition 301. 73–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deevy, Patricia. 2000. Agreement checking in comprehension. Evidence from relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 291. 69–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desmet, Timothy, Marc Brysbaert & Constantijne De Baecke. 2002. The correspondence between sentence production and corpus frequencies in modifier attachment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55A(3). 879–896. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desmet, Timothy, Constantijne De Baecke, Denis Drieghe, Marc Brysbaert & Wietske Vonk. 2006. Relative clause attachment in Dutch: On-line comprehension corresponds to corpus frequencies when lexical variables are taken into account. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(4). 453–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Vincenzi, Marica. 1999. Differences between the morphology of gender and number: Evidence from establishing coreferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 281. 537–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberhard, Kathleen, J. Cooper Cutting & Kathryn Bock. 2005. Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review 112(3). 531–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foote, Rebecca & Kathryn Bock. 2012. The role of morphology in subject-verb agreement: A comparison of Mexican and Dominican Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(3). 429–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraga, Isabel, Ana Piñeiro, Carlos Acuña-Fariña, Jaime Redondo & Javier García-Orza. 2012. Emotional nouns affect attachment decisions in sentence completion tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 651. 1740–1759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franck, Julie, Gabriella Vigliocco, Inés Antón-Méndez, Simona Collina & Ulrich Frauenfelder. 2008. The interplay of syntax and form in language production: A cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes 231. 329–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franck, Julie, Gabriella Vigliocco & Julie Nicol. 2002. Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy. Language and Cognitive Processes 17(4). 371–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn. 1979. On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Connecticut, CT: University of Connecticut PhD thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrett, Merrill. F. 1975. The analysis of sentence production. In Gordon H. Bower (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 133–171. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward, Neil J. Pearlmutter & Vicenc Torrens. 1999. Recency and lexical preferences in Spanish. Memory and Cognition 271. 603–611. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillespie, Maureen & Neal J. Pearlmutter. 2011. Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject-verb agreement production. Cognition 1181. 377–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lang, Peter J. 1995. The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychology 501. 372–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorimor, Heidi, Kathryn Bock, Ekaterina Zalkind, Alina Sheyman & Robert Beard. 2008. Agreement and attraction in Russian. Language and Cognitive Processes 231. 769–799. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molinaro, Nicola, Horacio Barber & Manuel Carreiras. 2011. Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex 471. 908–930. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicol, Janet. 1988. Coreference processing during sentence comprehension. Cambridge: MIT PhD thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osterhout, Lee & Linda Mobley. 1995. Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language 341. 739–773. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Ivan A. Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pynte, Joel & Saveria Colonna. 2001. Competition between primary and non-primary relations during sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 301. 569–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 2004. Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritter, Elisabeth. 1993. Where’s gender? Linguistic Inquiry 241. 795–803.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riveiro-Outeiral, Sara & Carlos Acuña-Fariña. 2012. Agreement processes in English and Spanish: a completion study. Functions of Language 19(1). 58–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riveiro-Outeiral, Sara, Carlos Acuña-Fariña & Isabel, Fraga. Submitted. Concreteness effects in the production of agreement errors: An English-Spanish comparison.
Schriefers, Herbert, Jörg Jescheniak & Ansgar Hantsch. 2002. Determiner selection in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 281. 941–950. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1998. Variation in major constituent order: A global and a European perspective. In Anna Siewierska (ed.), Constituent order in the languages of Europe, 475–551. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toribio, Almeida. J. 2000. Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish. Lingua 1101. 315–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Gompel, Roger & Simon Liversedge. 2003. The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition 29(1). 128–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vigliocco, Gabriella, Brian Butterworth & Merrill Garrett. 1996a. Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: The role of conceptual factors. Cognition 511. 261–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vigliocco, Gabriella, Brian Butterworth & Carlo Semenza. 1995. Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language 341. 186–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vigliocco, Gabriella & Julie Franck. 2001. When sex affects syntax: Contextual influences in sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language 451. 368–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Corbett, Greville G.
2019. Pluralia tantum nouns and the theory of features: a typology of nouns with non-canonical number properties. Morphology 29:1 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Fedden, Sebastian & Greville G. Corbett
2018. Extreme classification. Cognitive Linguistics 29:4 ► pp. 633 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue