Article published In: The Structure of the English NP: Synchronic and diachronic explorations
Edited by Kristin Davidse
[Functions of Language 23:1] 2016
► pp. 9–16
Introduction
Published online: 16 June 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.1.002int
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23.1.002int
References (30)
Adamson, Sylvia. 2000.
A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 39–66. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Adamson, Sylvia & Victorina González-Díaz. 2009. History and structure of the English noun phrase: Introduction. Transactions of the Philological Society 1071. 255–261.
Breban, Tine & Kristin Davidse. 2003. Adjectives of comparison: The grammaticalization of their attribute uses into postdeterminer and classifier uses. Folia Linguistica 37(3/4). 269–317.
Brems, Lieselotte. 2011. The layering of size noun and type noun constructions in English. Berlin: Mouton.
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell.
Denison, David. 2002. History of the S
ort of construction family. Paper presented at the
Second International Conference on Construction Grammar
, Helsinki, 6–8 September 2002.
. 2006. Category change and gradience in the determiner system. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 279–304. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fanego, Teresa. 2004. On reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change: The rise and development of English verbal gerunds. Diachronica 211. 5–55.
Fillmore, Charles & Paul Kay. 1993. Construction grammar course book. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.
Gehweiler, Elke, 2011. The grammaticalization of private adjectives: Present-day uses and diachronic development. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin PhD thesis.
Ghesquière, Lobke & Freek Van de Velde. 2011. A corpus-based account of the development of English such and Dutch zulk: Identification, intensification and (inter)subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 221. 765–797.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1976[1964]. English system networks. In Gunther Kress (ed.), Halliday: System and function in language, 101–135. Oxford: OUP.
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional change in English. Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4). 848–893.
Keizer, Evelien. 2007. The English noun phrase: The nature of linguistic categorization. Cambridge: CUP.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Michaelis, Laura. 2009. Sign-based construction grammar. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 155–176. Oxford: OUP.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière. 2013. Introduction: On multiple source constructions in language change. Studies in Language 37(3). 473–489.
Van Langendonck, Willy. 1999. Neurolinguistic and syntactic evidence for basic level meaning in proper names. Functions of Language 61. 95–138.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Leung, Alex Ho-Cheong & Wim van der Wurff
2018. Introduction to the noun phrase in English. In The noun phrase in English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 246], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
