Cover not available

Article published In: The Functions of Evidentiality
Edited by Eric Mélac and Pascale Leclercq
[Functions of Language 31:1] 2024
► pp. 63–89

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Functional transition from hear to nonvisual sensory and hearsay evidential categories

A case study of rGyalthang Tibetan

ORCiD logo with link | Kyoto University
Published online: 15 July 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22059.suz
Abstract
This article presents a development of evidential categories derived from a verb related to the auditory sense in the evidential system attested in rGyalthang Tibetan varieties. The language varieties under study possess a morphological distinction of at least five evidentials in the access-to-information category and two evidentials in the source-of-information category. The discussion focuses on one morpheme derived from the Literary Tibetan verb grag ‘resound, hear’ used for both categories, and examines its process of grammaticalisation and degrammaticalisation. Elicited data illustrate the following functions: (1) grag as a nonvisual sensory evidential suffix that was further degrammaticalised as a copulative nonvisual sensory verb stem; (2) grag as a hearsay marker in a separate syntactic slot, which extended from (1); and (3) grag as a lexical verb stem meaning ‘hear’ [the common origin to (1) and (2)], which underwent two grammaticalisation processes.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The evidential system of rGyalthang Tibetan
  • 3.Description
    • 3.1Grag as a nonvisual sensory evidential in rGyalthang Tibetan
    • 3.2Grag as a hearsay marker
    • 3.3Distinction of grag between nonvisual sensory and hearsay
  • 4.The developmental process of grag
    • 4.1The development of grag as a copulative nonvisual sensory stem
    • 4.2The development of grag as a hearsay marker
    • 4.3Summary of the development of grag
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
References (68)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018a. Evidentiality: The framework. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018b. Evidentiality and language contact. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), 148–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2018c. The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Online version. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartee, Ellen Lynn. 2007. A grammar of Dongwang Tibetan. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California at Santa Barbara PhD dissertation.
. 2011. The role of animacy in the verbal morphology of Dongwang Tibetan. In Mark Turin & Bettina Zeisler (eds.), 131–182. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bielmeier, Roland. 2000. Syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic-epistemic functions of auxiliaries in Western Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(2). 79–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dawa Drolma & Hiroyuki Suzuki. 2024. The paradigmaticity of evidentials in the Tibetic languages of Khams. Studies in Language 48(3). 723–752. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2018. Evidentiality in Tibetic. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), 580–594. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DTLF = Les missionnaires catholiques du Thibet. 1899. Dictionnaire thibétain-latin-français. Hong Kong: Imprimerie de la Société des Missions Étrangères.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebihara, Shiho. 2017. Evidentiality of the Tibetan verb snang. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), 41–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Epps, Patience. 2008. A grammar of Hup. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrett, Edward. 2001. Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles PhD dissertation.
Gawne, Lauren & Nathan W. Hill (eds.). 2017. Evidential systems in Tibetan languages. Leiden: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gonkatsang, Tsering & Michael Willis. 2021. Text and translation. In Lewis Doney (ed.), Bringing Buddhism to Tibet: History and narrative in the DBA’ BZHED manuscript, 102–157. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Häsler, Katrin Louise. 1999. A grammar of the Tibetan Dege (Sde dge) dialect. Zürich: Selbstverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2013. ḥdug as a testimonial marker in Classical and Old Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics 12(1). 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hongladarom, Krisadawan. 1993. Evidentials in Tibetan: A dialogic study of the interplay between form and meaning. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University PhD dissertation.
. 1994. Historical development of the Tibetan evidential tuu. In Hajime Kitamura, Tatsuo Nishida & Yasuhiko Nagano (eds.), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics, 673–684. Suita: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007a. Evidentiality in Rgyalthang Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2). 17–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007b. Grammatical peculiarities of two dialects of southern Kham Tibetan. In Roland Bielmeier & Felix Haller (eds.), Linguistics of the Himalayas and beyond, 119–152. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Chenglong. 2013. Zangmianyu cunzailei dongci de gainian jiegou [Conceptual structure of existential verbs in Tibeto-Burman]. Minzu Yuwen 21. 31–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huber, Brigitte. 2005. The Tibetan dialect of Lende (Kyirong): A grammatical description with historical annotations. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jäschke, Heinrich August. 1881. A Tibetan-English dictionary. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
sKal-bzang ’Gyur-med & sKal-bzang dByangs-can. 2002. Zangyu fangyan gailun [Introduction to Tibetan dialectology]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mélac, Eric. 2023. The pragmatic differences between grammatical and lexical evidentiality: A corpus-based study of Tibetan and English. Journal of Pragmatics 2101. 143–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Nebesky-Wojkowitz, René. 1956. Oracles and demons of Tibet: The cult and iconography of the Tibetan protective deities. Den Haag: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Degrammaticalization. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 475–488. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oisel, Guillaume. 2013. Morphosyntaxe et sémantique des auxiliaires et des connecteurs du tibétain littéraire: Etude diachronique et synchronique. Paris: Université de la Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3 PhD dissertation. URI: [URL]
. 2017. Re-evaluation of the evidential system of Lhasa Tibetan and its atypical functions. Himalayan Linguistics 16(2). 90–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rig-’dzin dBang-mo. 2012. Zangyu cunzaidongci de dilifenbu diaocha [Study on the geographical distribution of Tibetan existential verbs]. Zhongyang Minzu Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui ban) 61. 110–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roche, Gerald & Hiroyuki Suzuki. 2018. Tibet’s minority languages: Diversity and endangerment. Modern Asian Studies 52(4). 1227–1278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shao, Mingyuan. 2018. Hexi Zoulang binwei Zangyu Dongnahua yanjiu [Study on the mDungnag dialect, an endangered Tibetic language in Hexi Corridor]. Guangzhou: Zhongshan Daxue Chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, Hiroyuki. 2009. Deux remarques à propos du développement du ra-btags en tibétain parlé. Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines 161. 75–82. URI: [URL]
. 2011a. Deux remarques supplémentaires à propos du développement du ra-btags en tibétain parlé. Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines 201. 123–133. URI: [URL]
. 2011b. Dialectal particularities of Sogpho Tibetan: An introduction to the ‘Twenty-four villages’ patois’. In Mark Turin & Bettina Zeisler (eds.), 55–73. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011c. Gagatang Zangyu de yanhua yuanyin yu qi laiyuan [Pharyngealised vowels in Gagathang Tibetan and their origin]. Language and Linguistics 12(2). 477–500.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Multiple usages of the verb snang in Gagatang Tibetan (Weixi, Yunnan). Himalayan Linguistics 11(1). 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Niru Zangyu de xiaosheyin yu qi zangwen duiying guilü [Uvulars in Myigzur Tibetan and their sound correspondence with Literary Tibetan]. Dongfang Yuyanxue 141. 1–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. 100 linguistic maps of the Swadesh word list of Tibetic languages from Yunnan. Fuchu: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa. URI: [URL]
. 2022. Geolinguistics in the eastern Tibetosphere: An introduction. Tokyo: Geolinguistic Society of Japan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024a. Shaping rGyalthangic: A historical account of Yunnan Khams. In Takumi Ikeda (ed.), Grammatical phenomena of Sino-Tibetan languages 61. 87-108. Kyoto: Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024b. Evolution of dorsal fricatives in rGyalthangic varieties of Khams Tibetan. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan 28(2). In press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, Hiroyuki & Lozong Lhamo. 2021. /ka-/ negative prefix in Choswateng Tibetan of Khams (Shangri-La, Yunnan). Language and Linguistics 22(4). 593–629. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, Hiroyuki & Sonam Wangmo. 2021. Hearsay evidential marking strategy in Lhagang Tibetan: A case study on folktales and legends. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 44(2). 141–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, Hiroyuki, Sonam Wangmo & Tsering Samdrup. 2021. A contrastive approach to the evidential system in Tibetic languages: Examining five varieties from Khams and Amdo. Gengo Kenkyu 1591. 69–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas. 1992. La déixis en tibétain: Quelques faits remarquables. In Mary-Annick Morel & Laurent Danon-Boileau (eds.), La déixis, 197–208. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. L’ergativité en tibétain moderne: Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. L’aire linguistique tibétaine et ses divers dialectes. Lalies 251. 7–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct/disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart & Paul Widmer (eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 281–308. Bonn: Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. A typological sketch of evidential/epistemic categories in the Tibetic languages. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), 95–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Konchok Jiatso. 2001. Final auxiliary verbs in Literary Tibetan and Tibetan dialects. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(1). 49–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Randy J. LaPolla. 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2). 240–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Sangda Dorje. 2003. Manuel de tibétain standard: langue et civilisation, 2nd edn. Paris: L’Asiathèque.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & Hiroyuki Suzuki. 2023. The Tibetic languages: An introduction to the family of languages derived from Old Tibetan. Villejuif: LACITO Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tshe-skyid dBang-mo. 2020. Zangyu Kangfangyan Chengduohua de shizheng fanchou [Evidential category in Chengduo variety of Khams Tibetan]. Minzu Yuwen 11. 27–37. [URL]
Tshe-ring gYang-sgron. 2021. Dongwang Zangyu cankao yufa [A reference grammar of gTorwarong Tibetan]. Beijing: Minzu University of China PhD dissertation.
Turin, Mark & Bettina Zeisler (eds.). 2011. Himalayan languages and linguistics: Studies in phonology, semantics, morphology and syntax. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yliniemi, Juha. 2019. A descriptive grammar of Denjongke (Sikkimese Bhutia). Helsinki: Helsinki University PhD thesis. URI: [URL]
Zeisler, Bettina. 2004. Relative tense and aspectual values in Tibetan languages: A comparative study. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zemp, Marius. 2017. The origin and evolution of the opposition between testimonial and factual evidentials in Purik and other varieties of Tibetan. Open Linguistics 3(1). 613–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. A grammar of Purik Tibetan. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Yisun (ed.). 1986. Bod rgya tshig mdzod chen mo [Big Tibetan-Chinese dictionary]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhou, Yang & Hiroyuki Suzuki. 2022. Evidentiality in Selibu: A contact-induced emergence. Diachronica 39(2). 268–309. With an online appendix: [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zou, Yuxia & Hiroyuki Suzuki. 2022. Five folktales in Bragkhoglung Tibetan of Cone. Himalayan Linguistics Archive 111. 1–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue