Cover not available

Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 30:3 (2023) ► pp.287–319

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Definite-like meaning of bare classifiers in Nung

ORCiD logo with link | University of Edinburgh
Published online: 18 December 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22042.lam
Abstract
Nung (Tai, Kra-Dai) is a numeral-classifier language that contains the Classifier-Noun (cl-n, or ‘bare classifier’) construction. Drawing on Langacker’s Cognitive Grammar (Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, 2004. Remarks on nominal grounding. Functions of Language 11(1). 77–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York, NY: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, 2017. Ten lectures on the elaboration of Cognitive Grammar. Boston, MA: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) (CG), I argue that the use of a Nung cl-n phrase is only possible when it refers to a unique instance in the current discourse frame of the current discourse space. This explains why cl-n phrases show a definite-like meaning contrast with other types of nominal phrases (NPs) in Nung, as well as why Nung cl-n phrases can be interpreted as either specific or non-specific indefinite. This paper makes two theoretical contributions. Firstly, it shows that the existing theory of numeral classifiers within CG, which is based on the unitization function of numeral classifiers, is not sufficient to account for the meaning contrast between cl-n and other types of NP in Nung. Secondly, given that a referent that exists in the current discourse frame need not exist in the actual world or pre-exist in the discourse, this paper illustrates how a referent can satisfy a presupposition of uniqueness without satisfying a presupposition of existence in the actual world or in the discourse.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Method of data collection
    • 2.2Classifiers in Nung
    • 2.3Theories of nominal reference within CG
      • 2.3.1Types and instance
      • 2.3.2Grounding
      • 2.3.3Current Discourse Space (CDS)
  • 3.Theory of classifiers within CG
  • 4.Meanings of nominal reference proposed for numeral classifiers
  • 5.Meaning of Nung cl-n phrases
    • 5.1Definite cl-n phrases
      • 5.1.1Familiar definiteness
      • 5.1.2Unique definiteness
      • 5.1.3Analysis of familiar cl-n phrases based on CG
    • 5.2Non-familiar cl-n phrases
    • 5.3Bare count nouns and cl-n phrases
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • List of abbreviations
  • References
References (44)
References
Abbott, Barbara. 1999. Support for a unique theory of definiteness. Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory 91. 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Nominal classification: Towards a comprehensive typology. Sprachtypologie Und Universalienforschung: STUF 571. 105–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, Keith. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53(2). 285–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 1999. Classifiers in East and Southeast Asian languages: Counting and beyond. In Jadranka Gvozdanovic (ed.), Numeral types and changes worldwide, 113–185. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter & Kim Ngoc Quang. 2020. (In)definiteness and Vietnamese classifiers. In Kata Balogh, Robert D. Van Valin & Anja Latrouite (eds.), Nominal anchoring: Specificity, definiteness and article systems across languages, 15–50. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biswas, Priyanka. 2014. Reanalyzing definiteness in Bangla. In Kayla Carpenter, Oana David, Florian Lionnet, Christine Sheil, Tammy Stark, Vivian Wauters (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS 2012), 19–30. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. (ed.). 1980. The pear stories: Cognitive, culture and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic inquiry 30(4). 509–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 53–103. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth & David Beaver. 2015. Definiteness and determinacy. Linguistics and philosophy 38(5). 377–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fintel, Kai von. 2004. Would you believe it? The king of France is back! Presuppositions and truth-value intuitions. In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and beyond, 315–341. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet Deam & Ivan A. Sag. 1982. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and philosophy 5(3). 355–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frawley, William. 1992. Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1948. Sense and reference. The Philosophical Review 57(3). 209–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1972. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers on Language Universals 91. 1–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts PhD thesis.
. 1991. Artikel und definitheit. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Handbuch der Semantik, 487–535. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenks, Peter. 2015. Two kinds of definites in numeral classifier languages. Semantics and linguistic theory 251. 103–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Articulated definiteness without articles. Linguistic Inquiry 49(3). 501–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1968. What Do Referential Indices Refer to?. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation Publication P-3854.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lam, Esther. 2021a. Nung controlled elicitation—definiteness of classifier-noun phrases in object position, 2021 [dataset]. University of Edinburgh. School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021b. Nung controlled elicitation—specific and non-specific noun phrases, 2020–2021 [dataset]. University of Edinburgh. School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021c. Nung controlled elicitation—unique definite and kind-referring noun phrases, 2021 [dataset]. University of Edinburgh. School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021d. Nung narrative—‘A Dog, A Boy and A New Friend’, 2020 [dataset]. University of Edinburgh. School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023a. Definiteness of classifier-noun phrases in Nung. In Vera Hohaus, Jens Hopperdietzel & Siena Weingartz (eds.), Proceedings of TripleAFLA: 9th TripleA workshop for semantic fieldworkers, 29th annual meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, 32–43. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023b. Nung narrative—Lake Ba Be, 2020 [dataset]. University of Edinburgh. School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023c. Nung narratives based on the Pear Film, 2019–2020 [dataset]. University of Edinburgh. School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Remarks on nominal grounding. Functions of Language 11(1). 77–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York, NY: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Ten lectures on the elaboration of Cognitive Grammar. Boston, MA: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Löbel, Elizabeth. 2000. Classifiers versus genders and noun classes: A case study in Vietnamese. In Barbara Unterbeck, Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen, & Mirja Saari (eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition, 259–320. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Patrizia Pacioni. 1998. Specificity and genericity in Cantonese and Mandarin. In Liejiong Xu (ed.), The referential properties of Chinese noun phrases, 45–59. Paris: Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa. 2004. On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International journal of American linguistics 70(4). 369–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary L. 1979. Existential sentences in English. New York: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moroney, Mary. 2021. Updating the typology of definiteness: Evidence from bare nouns in Shan. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1). 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 2003. Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(3). 287–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saul, Janice E. & Nancy Freiberger Wilson. 1980. Nung grammar. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson T. 2011. Linguistic evidence and grammatical theory. WIREs Cognitive Science 2(2). 206–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarz, Florian. 2009. Two types of definites in natural language. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts PhD thesis.
Simpson, Andrew. 2017. Bare classifier/noun alternations in the Jinyun (Wu) variety of Chinese and the encoding of definiteness. Linguistics 55(2). 305–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew, Soh, Hooi Ling & Hiroki Nomoto. 2011. Bare classifiers and definiteness: A cross-linguistic investigation. Studies in Language 35(1). 168–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1950. On referring. Mind 591. 320–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, Yicheng. 2017. Numeral classifiers in Sinitic languages: Semantic content, contextuality, and semi-lexicality. Linguistics 55(2). 333–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue