Cover not available

Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 29:3 (2022) ► pp.300–327

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Self-denigration in academic discourse

The case of the Iranian doctoral defense

 | Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
 | Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
Published online: 1 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22021.may
Abstract
Using the methodology of Grounded Theory, this study aims to identify and analyze the perceptions and functions of self-denigration in dissertation defenses. The data comprises transcripts of two focus group discussions and the disputation sections of a corpus of 53 applied linguistics doctoral defense sessions gathered from 14 Iranian state universities between 2019 and 2021. The findings suggest that self-denigration depends to a great extent on the role of the participants in a disputation, and it is used before or after a criticism or a response to criticism. The analysis of the data revealed that self-denigration as a sign of respectfulness and modesty in a defense contributes to social decorum, diffidence, coercive self-deprecation, contrived modesty, or flamboyance. This study highlights the importance of self-denigration in the oral academic discourse of EFL defense sessions and has pedagogical implications for oral academic literacy practices.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Politeness & face at defenses
  • 3.What is denigration?
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Data and participants
    • 4.2Analytical procedures
  • 5.Analysis of doctoral defense sessions
    • 5.1Examiners’ talk-in-interaction
    • 5.2Supervisors’ talk-in-interaction
    • 5.3Doctoral candidates’ talk-in-interaction
  • 6.Participants’ perceptions of self-denigration
    • 6.1Social decorum
    • 6.2Diffidence
    • 6.3Coercive self-deprecation
    • 6.4Contrived modesty
    • 6.5Flamboyance
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (68)
References
Arundale, Robert B. 2006. Face as relational and interactional: a communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture 2(2). 193–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birks, Melanie & Jane Mills. 2015. Grounded theory: A practical guide, 2nd edn. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blickle, Gerhard, Corinna Diekmann, Paula B. Schneider, Yvonne Kalthöfer & James K. Summers. 2012. When modesty wins: Impression management through modesty, political skill, and career success – a two-study investigation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 21(6). 899–922. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Robyn. 2019. Self-defeating vs. self-deprecating humor: A case of being laughed at vs. laughed with? Melbourne: Swinburne University of Technology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Rong. 1993. Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics 20(1). 49–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. 2012. Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 4th edn. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneshvar, Maryam, Ali Asghar Kargar & Arash Zareian. 2017. A pragmatic analysis of the interactions in MA TEFL students’ defense sessions. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research 4(7). 217–235.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dendenne, Boudjemaa. 2021. Compliments, self-praise, and self-denigration among nonnative English users in an online setting. TESL-EJ 25(1). 1–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayter, Daria. 2014. Self-praise in microblogging. Journal of Pragmatics 611. 91–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Dealing with interactionally risky speech acts in simultaneous interpreting: The case of self-praise. Journal of Pragmatics 1741. 28–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dobson, Stephen. 2018. Assessing the viva in higher education: chasing moments of truth. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Don, Zuraidah Mohd & Ahmad Izadi. 2011. Relational connection and separation in Iranian dissertation defenses. Journal of Pragmatics 43(15). 3782–3792. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Interactionally achieving face in criticism criticism-response exchanges. Language Communication 33(3). 221–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drisko, James & Tina Maschi. 2015. Content analysis. New York: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney. 1992. Basics of Grounded Theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1955. On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18(3). 213–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2). 237–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hadley, Gregory. 2017. Grounded theory in applied linguistics research: A practical guide. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, Beverly, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki & Tsunao Ogino. 1986. Universals of linguistics politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics 101. 347–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izadi, Ahmad. 2013. Politeness in spoken review genre: Viva voce context. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 21(4). 1327–1346.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Over-politeness in Persian professional interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 1021. 13–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. Mixed messages in criticisms in Iranian PhD dissertation defenses. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 11(3). 270–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017c. Turn-taking, preference, and face in criticism responses. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics 8(1). 72–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Izadi, Ahmad & Alireza Jalilifar. 2010. Politeness in LAP assessment: Dissertation defense sessions in focus. Iranian Journal of TEFLL 2(2). 71–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jalilifar, Alireza & Nadia Mayahi. 2022. Referral for resubmission: Scholarly expectations of EFL applied linguistics doctoral defense sessions. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Ronald M., Lars Hansen, Valentina Moskvina, David Kingdon & Douglas Turkington. 2010. The relationship between self-esteem and psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia: A longitudinal study. Psychosis 2(3). 218–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2009. Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments. Journal of Pragmatics 41(8). 1611–1635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Gerold Schneider, Irma Taavitsainen & Barb Breustedt. 2008. Fishing for compliments: Precision and recall in corpus-linguistic compliment research. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), 273–294. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. 2013. Relational rituals and communication: Ritual interaction in groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Politeness and impoliteness in Chinese discourse. In Chris Shei (ed.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis, 203–215. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. & Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding politeness. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. & Ling Zhou. 2021. Self-denigration in 21st century Chinese. Journal of Politeness Research 17(2). 265–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Myung-Hee. 2014. Why self-deprecating? Achieving ‘oneness’ in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 691. 82–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krueger, Richard A. & Mary Anne Casey. 2015. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, 5th edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach. 1990. Talking power: The politics of language in our lives. Glasgow: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2007. Politeness: Is there an East-West divide? Journal of Politeness Research 3(2). 167–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The pragmatics of politeness. New York: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. 2008. Relational work, politeness and identity construction. In Gerd Antos, Eija Ventola & Tilo Weber (eds.), Handbooks of Applied Linguistics: Interpersonal Communication, 509–540. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 9–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayahi, Nadia & Alireza Jalilifar. 2022. Self-denigration in doctoral defense sessions: Scale development and validation. ESP Today 10(1). 2–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mežek, Špela & John M. Swales. 2016. PhD defences and vivas. In Ken Hyland & Philip Shaw (eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes, 361–375. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, Rowena. 2003. Students’ questions and their implications for the viva. Quality Assurance in Education 11(2). 109–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohashi, Jun. 2013. Thanking and politeness in Japanese: Balancing acts in interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Owens, Timothy J., & Adam B. King. 2001. Measuring self-esteem: Race, ethnicity, and gender considered. In Timothy J. Owens, Sheldon Stryker & Norman Goodman (eds.), Extending self-esteem theory and research: Sociological and psychological currents, 56–84. New York: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preuss, Gregory S. & Mark D. Alicke. 2017. My worst faults and misdeeds: Self-criticism and self-enhancement can co-exist. Self and Identity 16(6). 645–663. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recski, Leonardo. 2005. Interpersonal engagement in academic spoken discourse: A functional account of dissertation defenses. English for Specific Purposes 24(1). 5–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichertz, Jo. 2019. Abduction: The logic of discovery in Grounded Theory – An updated review. In Antony Bryant & Kathy Charmaz (eds.), The Sage handbook of current developments in Grounded Theory, 259–281. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad. 2003. On cultural conceptualization. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(3). 187–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Cultural schemes in L1 and L2 compliment responses: A study of Persian-speaking learners of English. Journal of Politeness Research 4(1). 55–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speer, Susan A. 2019. Reconsidering self-deprecation as communication practice. British Journal of Social Psychology 58(4). 806–828. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2002. Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics 341. 529–545. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2008. Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. (Im)politeness and rapport. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), 11–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, Patrick Ng & Li Dong. 2008. British and Chinese reactions to compliment responses. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), 95–117.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suh, Kyung-Hee. 2010. A contrastive study of compliment responses of Korean, Chinese and English speakers. Yengmiyenkwu (English and American Studies) 221. 131–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Chen-Hsin & Grace Qiao Zhang. 2009. A contrastive study of compliment responses among Australian English and Mandarin Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics 411. 325–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tie, Ylona Chun, Melanie Birks & Karen Francis. 2019. Grounded Theory: A design framework for novice researchers. Sage Open Medicine 71. 1–8.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walkinshaw, Ian, Nathaniel Mitchell & Sophiaan Subhan. 2019. Self-denigration as a relational strategy in lingua franca talk: Asian English Speaker. Journal of Pragmatics 1391. 40–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Changrong. 2013. Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations: A multimodal analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 50(1). 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zare, Javad. 2016. Self-mockery: A study of Persian multi-party interactions. Text & Talk 36 (6). 789–812. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Mayahi, Nadia & Alireza Jalilifar
2024. The in-group ritual of self-denigration in Iranian doctoral defense sessions: applied linguists’ attitudes, functions and perceptions in focus. Journal of Politeness Research 20:2 ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Mayahi, Nadia & Alireza Jalilifar
2025. The evolution of research articles on self-denigration: a systematic review across disciplines. Journal of Politeness Research 21:1 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue