Exchange Structure: Refinements to the model through a study of multiparty discourse of 4 to 5 year-old children

Berry, Margaret; Mukherjee, Sarah Jane

doi:10.1075/fol.22016.ber

Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 29:3 (2022) ► pp.253–273

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Download EPUB

Exchange Structure: Refinements to the model through a study of multiparty discourse of 4 to 5 year-old children

Margaret Berry | University of Nottingham

Sarah Jane Mukherjee | The Open University

Published online: 12 September 2022

https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22016.ber

Abstract

This paper proposes a number of refinements to the original theory of Exchange Structure as first conceived. It first offers a summary of the early ideas and considers challenges made by others. The study responds to these challenges through new analysis of multiparty discourse. The paper discusses revisions to the model based on these challenges drawing on the iterative analysis conducted and considers other points relevant to multiparty discourse. The data is drawn from transcribed video recordings of small groups of 4 to 5 year-old children’s peer-led dialogic interactions as they engage in role-play. In addition to the development of Exchange Structure theory, this new analysis sheds light on the nature of negotiation within multiparty discourse and the dynamics of negotiation by young children in this playful context.

Keywords: Knowledge negotiating, Action negotiating, Exchange Structure, children’s language, multiparty discourse, role-play

Article outline

1.Introduction
2.A metafunctional model of the exchange
3.Methodology
4.Challenges and refinements to the model
- 4.1The problem of relations between action negotiating exchanges and knowledge exchanges
- 4.2The problem of delimiting exchanges
- 4.3The problem of what units carry the various forms of negotiation: Exchanges and transactions
- 4.4The problem of what units carry the various forms of negotiation: Moves and acts
- 4.5The problem of how to analyse when an action is the responsibility of more than one of the interactants
5.Summary
Acknowledgements
Notes
References

References (22)

References

Berry, Margaret. 1981a. Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds.), Studies in Discourse Analysis, 120–145. London: Routledge.

. 1981b. Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network 21. 23–32.

. 2016a. On describing contexts of situation. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Yameng Liang (eds.), Society in Language, Language in Society: Essays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 184–205. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

. 2016b. Dynamism in exchange structure. English Text Construction 9(1). 33–55.

. 2017. Challenging moves and supporting moves in discourse. In Stella Neumann, Rebekah Wegener, Jennifer Fest, Paula Niemietz & Nicola Hützen (eds.), Challenging Boundaries in Linguistics: Systemic Functional Perspectives, 255–280. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

. 2021. Inequalities in status: how do they show in discourse and what can be done about them? Lingua. 2611.

Eggins, Suzanne & Diane Slade. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1961. Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17(3). 241–292.

1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge.

Kimps, Ditte, Kristin Davidse & Gerard O’Grady. 2019. English tag questions eliciting knowledge or action: a comparison of the speech function and exchange structure models. Functions of Language, 26(1). 86–111.

Martin, J. R. & David Rose. 2007. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause, 2nd edn. London: Continuum.

Martin, J. R., Michele Zappavigna & Paul Dwyer. 2009. Negotiating shame: exchange and genre structure in youth justice conferencing. In Mahboob Ahmar & Caroline Lipovsky (eds.), Studies in Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, 41–72. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Mukherjee, Sarah Jane. 2016a. Children’s meaning making in classroom role-play at 4–5 years: A Systemic Functional Linguistic investigation. Milton Keynes: Open University PhD thesis.

. 2016b. Recordings collected in connection with Mukherjee (2016a).

Muntigl, Peter. 2004. Narrative Counselling: Social and Linguistic Processes of Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

. 2009. Knowledge moves in conversational exchanges: Revisiting the concept of primary vs. secondary knowers. Functions of Language 16(2). 225–263.

O’Donnell, Michael. 1990. A dynamic model of exchange, Word 411. 293–327.

Rose, David. 2014. Analysing pedagogic discourse: an approach from genre and register. Functional Linguistics 1(11). 1–32.

Sinclair, John McH. & Malcolm R. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: OUP.

Ventola, Eija. 1987. The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Pinter.

Zappavigna, Michele & J. R. Martin. 2018. Discourse and Diversionary Justice: An Analysis of Youth Justice Conferencing. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Lu, Jiqiang & Kristin Davidse

2025. The functions of grammaticalized complement-taking-predicate clauses in interrogatives: a typology. Text & Talk 45:6 ► pp. 819 ff.

Zhang, Dongbing, Jiajia Wang & Chengfang Song

2025. Scaffolding instruction in an EFL drama lesson: a systemic functional analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63:1 ► pp. 185 ff.

Zhang, Dongbing

2024. Towards a responsibility-based model of the move system in discourse semantics: Reasoning from above. Lingua 309 ► pp. 103796 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.