Cover not available

Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 22:3 (2015) ► pp.332–361

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Preaching in uncertain terms

The place of hedging language in contemporary sermonic discourse

 | Lund University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 10 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.3.02mal
This study investigates hedging (standardly assumed to express uncertainty, plausible reasoning and the like) in contemporary sermonic discourse as represented by sermon manuscripts from three Christian denominations in the UK. The article addresses three research questions: (i) To what extent is preaching employed as a discursive resource during preaching; (ii) What form does hedging take in sermonic discourse; and (iii) What are preachers’ rationale for hedging? The results suggest that hedging is indeed of central concern in sermonic discourse with some kind of hedging device being called upon once every 32 seconds. When preachers hedge they rely on standard and transparent linguistic expressions that typically perform this discourse function, and the repertoire includes both ‘conversational’ hedges and hedges that recall practices characteristic of written academic discourse. When preachers self-report on their rationale for hedging a multitude of different discourse functions become apparent. However, it seems that hedging is rarely used to convey lack of epistemic confidence; rather, hedging is seen as a productive interpersonal means to address one of the main objectives of contemporary, turn-to-the-listener, preaching — namely acknowledging sermon listeners as active partners in a sermonic experience.
References (57)
Ädel, Annelie & Anna Mauranen. 2010. Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9(2). 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. I think — an English modal particle. In Toril Swan & Olaf J. Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives, 1–48. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, O. Wesley, Jr. 2010. Introduction: The pillars of the new homiletic. In O. Wesley Allen Jr. (ed.), The renewed homiletic, 1–23. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, Ronald J. 1992. Preaching the topical sermon. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Preaching as mutual critical correlation through conversation. In Jana Childers (ed.), Purposes of preaching, 1–22. Atlanta, GA: Chalice.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anthony, Lawrence. 2014. AntConc (3.2.4m) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. [URL] (10 March 2014)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ashworth, Jacinta & Ian Farthing. 2007. Churchgoing in the UK: A research report from Tearfund on church attendance in the UK. Tearfund. [URL] (16 March 2014)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9(1). 93–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johnsson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broadus, John A. & Jesse B. Weatherspoon. 1944. On the preparation and delivery of sermons. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. 56–310. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buttrick, David. 1987. Homiletic: Moves and structures. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia. 1999. On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 31(7). 881–909. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Joanna Nichols & Wallace Chafe (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 261–273. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craddock, Fred. B. 2001. As one without authority. Atlanta, GA: Chalice.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Preaching. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crompton, Peter. 1997. Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes 16(4). 271–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutting, Joan. 2007. Vague language explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drever, Eric. 2003. Using semi-structured interviews in small-scale research: A teacher’s guide. Glasgow: The SCRE Centre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eslinger, Richard. 2002. The web of preaching: New options in homiletic method. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flottum, Kjersti & Trine Dahl. 2012. Different contexts, different “stories”? A linguistic comparison of two development reports on climate change. Language & Communication 32(1). 14–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1975. Hedged performatives. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts, 187–210. New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Pragmatic competence: the case of hedging. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging, 15–34. Bingley: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hogan, Lucy. 1999. Rethinking persuasion: Developing an incarnational theology of preaching. Homiletic 24(2). 1–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 1996. Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics 17(4). 433–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Polly Tse. 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25(2). 156–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Immink, F. Gerrit. 2004. Homiletics: The current debate. International Journal of Practical Theology 8(1). 89–121 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider. 2010. Introduction. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging, 1–14. Bingley: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1972. Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Papers from the eighth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 1972 . 188–228.
Lewin, Beverly A. 2005. Hedging: An exploratory study of authors’ and readers’ identification of ‘toning down’ in scientific texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4(2). 163–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lose, David J. 2003. Confessing Jesus Christ: Preaching in a postmodern world. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malmström, Hans. In Press. The ‘other’ voice in preaching: intertextual form and function in contemporary English sermonic discourse. Journal of Communication and Religion.
Maring, Norman & Winthrop Hudson. 2012. A Baptist manual of polity and practice. Valley Forge, PA: Judson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markkanen, Raija & Hartmut Schröder. 1997. Introduction. In Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schröder (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts, 3–20. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2000. Close reading: Functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. In Len Unsworth (ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives, 257–302. London: Cassell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McClure, John S. 2003. The four codes of preaching: Rhetorical strategies. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Preaching words: 144 key terms in homiletics. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1990. Mood and modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F., Joel Frader & Charles Bosk. 1982. On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In Robert J. Di Pietro (ed.), Linguistics and the professions, 83–97. Norwood.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph & Christoph Schönborn. 1994. Introduction to the catechism of the Catholic Church. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, Lucy. 1997. Sharing the word: Preaching in the roundtable church. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise. 1994. Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 13(2). 140–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seters, Arthur van. 1991. The problematic of preaching in the third millennium. Interpretation 45(3). 267–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 2000. The functions of I think in political discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(1). 41–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornbury, Scott & Diana Slade. 2006. Conversation: From description to pedagogy. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vande Kopple, William J. 2002. Metadiscourse, discourse, and issues in composition and rhetoric. In Ellen L. Barton & Gail Stygall (eds.), Discourse studies in composition, 91–113. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waznak, Robert. 1998. An introduction to the homily. Collegeville: The Liturgical Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Paul S. 1995. The practice of preaching. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Preaching and homiletical theory. Atlanta, GA: Chalice.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, Peter R.R. & Motoki Sano. 2006. Dialogistic positions and anticipated audiences. A framework for stylistic comparisons. In Karin Aijmer & Anne-Marie Simon Vandenbergen (eds.), Pragmatic markers in contrast, 189–214. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1992. Rediscovering the sacred: Perspectives on religion in contemporary society. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The God problem: Expressing faith and being reasonable. Berkeley, CA: University of California. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Palangyos, Amabel C. & Mark B. Ulla
2025. Persuasion, proclamation, and power: the role of language and rhetoric in sermon delivery. Cogent Arts & Humanities 12:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue