Cover not available

Review published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 22:2 (2015) ► pp.278–287

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.). Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 242]. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. xi + 418 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 5647 8(hb) 978 90 272 7072 6(eb)

Reviewed by
 | Lund University
Published online: 10 September 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.2.06fuo
References (23)
References
Argamon, Shlomo, Kenneth Bloom, Andrea Esuli & Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2009. Automatically determining attitude type and force for sentiment analysis. In Zygmunt Vetulani & Hans Uszkoreit (eds.), Human language technology. Challenges of the information society, 218–231. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Artstein, Ron & Massimo Poesio. 2008. Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics 34(4). 555–596. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika & Helen Caple. 2012. News discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2006. Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(2). 97–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina & Anna Mauranen. 2003. Evaluation in academic discourse. Special issue of Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortazzi, Martin & Lixian Jin. 2000. Evaluating evaluation in narrative. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 102–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo. 2012. Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse & Communication 6(1). 55–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo & Charlotte Hommerberg. Forthcoming. Optimizing transparency, reliability and replicability: Annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions. Corpora 10(3).
Hunston, Susan. 1994. Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), Advances in written text analysis, 191–218. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & John Sinclair. 2000. A local grammar of evaluation. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 74–101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Geoff Thompson. 2000. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. 1997. Angels and devils in hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warsaw: Energeia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In William Labov (ed.), Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular, 354–396. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2000. Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 142–175.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Mick. 2008. Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation. In Proceedings of the 46th annual meeting of the Association for computational linguistics on human language technologies: Demo session, 13–16. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pang, Bo & Lillian Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2(1–2). 1–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Read, Jonathan & John Carroll. 2012. Annotating expressions of appraisal in English. Language Resources and Evaluation 46(3). 421–447 First published online, December 2010. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite & Marta Carretero. 2012. Contrastive analyses of evaluation in text: Key issues in the design of an annotation system for attitude applicable to consumer reviews in English and Spanish. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6(1–3). 275–295.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite & Jack Grieve. 2004. Analyzing appraisal automatically. In Proceedings of AAAI spring symposium on exploring attitude and affect in text, 158–161. Stanford, CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitelaw, Casey, Navendu Garg & Shlomo Argamon. 2005. Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International conference on information and knowledge management, 625–631. New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue