Cover not available

Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 22:2 (2015) ► pp.232–263

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Lexicalization and grammaticalization

The case of the verbo-nominal expressions be on the/one’s way/road

 | University of Leuven
 | FWO-Research Foundation Flanders
 | Université de Lille 3
Published online: 10 September 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.2.03rom
In this article we show that verbo-nominal expressions be on the/one’s way/road emerged as lexical composite predicates in Old English. These templates came to be elaborated by directional adjuncts, adjuncts describing states or events, and purpose clauses. In Late Modern English, the structure with a to-infinitive was functionally reinterpreted as a secondary auxiliary + lexical head, whose core sense is imminential aspect. On the basis of this case study, we develop a theoretical reflection on the differences between lexicalization and grammaticalization, as they emerge within a functional-constructional approach. On the syntagmatic axis, we adopt Boye & Harder’s (2007, 2012) principles for distinguishing lexicalized from grammaticalized uses on the basis of their having primary or secondary status in discourse usage. On the paradigmatic axis, we rethink the neo-Firthian distinction between lexis and grammar in diachronic terms. Individual lexical items are defined by their collocations (Sinclair 1991) and grammatical values by their systemic interdependencies (Halliday 1992). Lexicalization is then characterized by the development of distinctive collocational networks and grammaticalization by the acquisition of the defining interdependencies with values from related grammatical systems.
References (66)
Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic gradience. The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2007. Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 311. 569–609. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 881. 1–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte. 2007. The grammaticalization of small size nouns: Reconsidering frequency and analogy. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4). 293–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1988. The development of English aspectual systems: Aspectualizers and post-verbal particles. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The aktionsart of deverbal nouns in English. In Pier Marco Bertinetto (ed.), Temporal reference, aspect and actionality. Vol. 11, 27–42. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia. 2000. Multi-word verbs in Early Modern English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In Petra Maria Vogel & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes, 65–102. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Simon De Wolf. 2012. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: The development of idioms and grammaticalized expressions with no question . Text & Talk 32(5). 569–591. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Deyne, Simon, Yves Peirsman & Gert Storms. 2009. Sources of semantic similarity. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1834–1839. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2009. Analysing reanalysis. Lingua 119(11). 1728–1755. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 1991. A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat, Susan Reed & Bert Cappelle. 2006. The grammar of the English verb phrase. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. On some problem areas in grammaticalization theory. In Ekaterini Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues, 17–50. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Elena Smirnova. 2012. ‘Paradigmatic integration’: The fourth stage in an expanded grammaticalization scenario. In Kristin Davidse, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: Origins, criteria and outcomes, 109–131. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1989. The theory of Functional Grammar: 1. The structure of the clause. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 761. 546–592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert. 1951/1957. Models of meaning. Papers in linguistics 1934-1951 (1957). London: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, Miriam. 2010. Grammaticalization and lexicalization effects in participial morphology: A Construction Grammar approach to language change. In An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds.), Formal evidence in grammaticalization research, 191–223. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garachana, Mar, Sandra Montserrat & Claus Pusch (eds.). 2013. From composite predicates to verbal periphrases in Romance languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adèle. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1961. Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17(3). 241–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1966. Lexis as a linguistic level. In Charles E. Bazell, J.C. Catford, M.A.K. Halliday, & R. Robins (eds.), In memory of J.R. Firth, 148–162. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. How do you mean? In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics. Recent theory and practice, 20–35. London: Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1994. On the genesis of aspect in African languages: The proximative. In Proceedings of the twentieth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special session on historical issues in African linguistics , 35–36. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 251. 127–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2004. Are low-frequency complex prepositions grammaticalized? In Hans Lindquist & Christian Mair (eds), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 171–210. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Volume I: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, 17–36. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971 [1939]. Signe zéro. In Selected writings. Volume 2: Word and language , 211–219. The Hague: Mouton.
Jespersen, Otto. 1914-29/1956. A modern English grammar on historical principles. 7 Vols1. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Susan & John M. Sinclair. 1973. English lexical collocations. Cahiers de Lexicologie XXIII1, 15–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, Crista. 1993. Aspekt im Maa. (Afrikanistische Monographien 3). Köln: Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical prequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002 [1982]. Thoughts on grammaticalization. München: LINCOM Europe. [First published as Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch. University of Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 1–18. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maslov, Yuriy S. 1985. An outline of contrastive qspectology. Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGregor, William. 1997. Semiotic grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura. 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15(1). 1–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moens, Marc & Marc Steedman. 1988. Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14(2). 15–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Navalpatro-Gómez, Ana. 2000. The expression of imminence in English, Spanish and Galician: Some questions. Düsseldorf Working Papers in Linguistics II1. 33–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk. 2007. Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2). 177–202. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petré, Peter, Kristin Davidse & Tinne Van Rompaey. 2012. On ways of being on the way: Lexical, complex preposition and aspectual marker uses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(2). 229–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ronan, Patricia. 2014. Light verb constructions in the history of English. In Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.), Corpus interrogation and grammatical patterns, 17–36. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1949. Selected writings in language, culture and personality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John M. 1991. Corpus, concordance and collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2012. Grammaticalization, constructions and the grammaticalization of constructions. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change. New reflections, 165–196. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Rompaey, Tinne. 2014. A comparison of progressive be V-ing with be in the middle, midst, process or act of V-ing: The interaction of lexical and grammatical progressive aspect. Transactions of the Philological Society 112(2). 188–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Rompaey, Tinne & Kristin Davidse. 2014. The different developments of progressive aspect markers be in the middle/midst of and be in the process of V-ing: Mechanisms of change. In Sylvie Hancil & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Theory and data, 181–202. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2). 143–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verkuyl, Henk. 2005. Aspectual composition: Surveying the ingredients. In Henk Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds.), Studies in theoretical psycholinguistics: Perspectives on aspect, 19–39. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Bogaards, Maarten & Roné Wierenga
2025. Aspectual cognate constructions in Afrikaans and Dutch. In Dutch and Contact Linguistics [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 55], ► pp. 278 ff. DOI logo
Gentens, Caroline, Lobke Ghesquière, William B. McGregor & An Van linden
2023. Reconnecting form and meaning. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Leddy-Cecere, Thomas
2022. Indexicality, semanticity and contact along the now < this time pathway. Journal of Historical Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 70 ff. DOI logo
Nhatuve, Diocleciano
2022. Tendências genolexicais em adjetivos neológicos no português de Moçambique. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos 64 ► pp. e022023 ff. DOI logo
Mulder, Walter De
2019.  En voie de . Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 54:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Hilpert, Martin
2018. Three open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21], ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Fontaine, Lise
2017. On prepositions and particles: a case for lexical representation in systemic functional linguistics. <i>WORD</i> 63:2 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue