Cover not available

Article published In: Sensory Perceptions in Language and Cognition
Edited by Rosario Caballero and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 22:1] 2015
► pp. 96–131

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Sensation, perception and cognition

Swedish in a typological-contrastive perspective

 | Uppsala University
Published online: 1 May 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.1.05vib
This paper presents an analysis of the field of perception verbs in Swedish within a typological and contrastive framework. Earlier work has to a great extent focused on the concepts see and hear. This article focuses on the more ‘raw’ form of perception represented by sensations and on the combination of meanings referring to perception and cognition in Swedish känna ‘feel, know’. The polysemy of känna turns out to be very language-specific even in relation to the most closely related Germanic languages. The polysemy of känna is interesting also because this verb can refer to internal (bodily) perception and has an extension that covers blended spaces combining cognitive elements with emotional and bodily feelings (cf. feel remorse, feel convinced). Special attention is paid also to sensory verbs describing sensations of light and sound (cf. English glitter, glimmer, rattle, creak, etc.) and of bodily sensations and pain (cf. ache, itch, etc.) Sensations are interesting because — similar to sensory adjectives — evaluation and intensity are central components of their meaning in addition to the fine-grained description of sensory qualia. There are great differences across languages in the degree of elaboration of sensory verbs referring to sensations. Recent typological work has demonstrated great elaborations of taste verbs in some languages, whereas other languages have elaborated odor verbs. Swedish (similar to many other European languages) has a rich repertoire of sound verbs.
References (50)
Abelin, Åsa. 1999. Studies in sound symbolism (Gothenburg monographs in Linguistics vol. 171). Gothenburg: Dept. of Linguistics, Gothenburg University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Anne Storch. 2013. Linguistic expression of perception and cognition: A typological glimpse. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), 1–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds.). 2013. Perception and cognition in language and culture. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt & Karin Aijmer. 2000. The English-Swedish parallel corpus: A resource for contrastive research and translation studies. In Christian Mair & Marianne Hundt (eds.), Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory, 15–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo. 1976. Meaning and structure of Finnish descriptive vocabulary. In Robert T. Harms & Frances Karttunen (eds.), Papers from the transatlantic Finnish conference, 1–12. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Paul Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brenzinger, Matthias & Anne-Maria Fehn. 2013. From body to knowledge: Perception and cognition in Khwe-ǁAni and Ts’ixa. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), 161–191.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling. 1949. A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages. A contribution to the history of ideas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas & Asifa Majid. 2011. Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. Senses & Society 6(1). 19–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colman, Andrew (ed.). 1994. Companion encyclopedia of psychology. Vol.11. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enghels, Renata & Marlies Jansegers. 2013. On the crosslinguistic equivalence of sentir(e) in Romance languages: A contrastive study in semantics. Linguistics 51(5). 957–991. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas M. & David Wilkins. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extension of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3). 546–592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardin, C.L. & Louisa Maffi (eds.). 1997. Color categories in thought and language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hellquist, Elof. 1898. Om nordiska verb på suffixalt -k, -l, -r, -s och -t samt af dem bildade nomina. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 141. 136–194.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John Ohala. 1994. Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John Ohala (eds.), Sound symbolism, 1–12. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hummelstedt, Eskil. 1939. Östsvenska verbstudier. Helsingfors: Centraltryckeriet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas. 2010. Is perception a directional relationship? On directionality and its motivation in Finnish expressions of sensory perception. Linguistics 48(1). 49–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 2011/1883). Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. 25th edn. revised by Elmar Seebold. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majid, Masifa & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.). 2011. The senses in language and culture. Special issue of Senses & Society 6(1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malt, Barbara C. & Phillip Wolff (eds.). 2010. Words and the mind. How words capture human experience. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maslova, Elena. 2004. A universal constraint on the sensory lexicon, or when hear can mean ‘see’? In Alexandr P. Volodin (ed.), Tipologičeskie obosnovanija v grammatike: k 70-letiju professora Xrakovskogo V.S., 300–312. Moscow: Znak. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mather, George. 2006. Foundations of perception. Hove & New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Hirosi. 2012. The importance of taste verbs in some Khoe languages. Linguistics 50(3). 395–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita & Mats Eeg-Olofsson. 2013. Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. In Rosario Caballero (guest ed.), Metaphor in and across genres. Thematic issue of Metaphor and Symbol 28(1). 22–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plümacher, Martina & Petyer Holz (eds.). 2007. Speaking of colors and odors. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ralph, Bo. 1991. Strömningar inom ordforskningen. Svenskans beskrivning 181. 9–28. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regier, Terry, Paul Kay, Aubrey L. Gilbert & Richard B Ivry. 2010. Language and thought: Which side are you on, anyway? In Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds.), 165–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reznikova, Tatiana, Ekaterina Rakhilina & Anastasia Bonch-Osmolovskaya. 2012. Towards a typology of pain predicates. Linguistics 50(3). 421–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberson, Debi & J. Richard Hanley. 2010. Relatively speaking: An account of the relationship between language and thought in the color domain. In Barbara C. Malt & Phillip Wolff (eds.), 165–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2010. Descriptions of pain, metaphor, and embodied simulation. Metaphor and Symbol 251. 205–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snell-Hornby, Mary. 1983. Verb-descriptivity in German and English. A contrastive study in semantic fields. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storch, Anne. 2013. Knowing, smelling and telling tales in Luwo. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), 47–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strik Lievers, Francesca. 2007. Italian perception verbs. A corpus-based study. In Sansò, Andrea (ed.), Language resources and linguistic theory, 167–179. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanhove, Martine. 2008. Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A crosslinguistic perspective. In Martine Vanhove (ed.), From polysemy to semantic change. Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations, 341–370. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke. 1980. Tre semantiska fält i svenskan och andra språk. SSM Report 7. Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University. Available at: [URL].
. 1983. Studier i kontrastiv lexikologi: Perceptionsverb. SSM Report 8. Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University. Available at: [URL]
. 1984. The verbs of perception: a typological study. Linguistics 21(1). 123–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Polysemy and differentiation in the lexicon. Verbs of physical contact in Swedish. In Jens Allwood & Peter Gärdenfors (eds.), Cognitive semantics. Meaning and cognition, 87–129. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. The verbs of perception. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. An international handbook, 1294–1309. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Towards a lexical profile of the Swedish verb lexicon. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59(1). 103–129.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Swedish verbs of perception from a typological and contrastive perspective. In María de los Ángeles Gómez González, J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Elsa M. González-Álvarez (eds.), Languages and cultures in contrast and comparison, 123–172. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. The meaning patterns of Swedish låta ‘sound’; ‘let’. A corpus-based contrastive study. In Petra Bernardini, Verner Egerland & Jonas Granfeldt (eds.), Mélanges plurilingues offerts à Suzanne Schlyter à l’occasion de son 65ème anniversaire. [Études romanes de Lund 85], 455–480. Lund: University of Lund.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Swedish impersonal constructions from a crosslinguistic perspective. An exploratory corpus-based study. Orientalia Suecana 591. 122–158. Available at: [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Language-specific meanings in contrast: A corpus-based contrastive study of Swedish få ‘get’. In Alexandra Lenz & Gudrun Rawoens (guest eds.), The art of getting: Get verbs in European languages from a synchronic and diachronic point of view. Thematic issue of Linguistics 50(6). 1413–1461.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Seeing the lexical profile of Swedish through multilingual corpora. The case of Swedish åka and other vehicle verbs. In Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), Advances in corpus-based contrastive linguistics. Studies in honour of Stig Johansson, 25–56. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (22)

Cited by 22 other publications

Yao, Qing & Haipeng (Allan) Chen
2025. The Impact of Sensory Verbs in Online Reviews on Helpfulness Perception and Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Narrative Processing. Psychology & Marketing 42:11 ► pp. 2703 ff. DOI logo
Erk Emeksiz, Zeynep & Julian Rentzsch
2024. Visual perception verbs in Old Anatolian Turkish. Journal of Historical Linguistics DOI logo
van de Weijer, Joost, Ivana Bianchi & Carita Paradis
2024. Sensory modality profiles of antonyms. Language and Cognition 16:1 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Hartman, Jenny & Carita Paradis
2023. The language of sound: events and meaning multitasking of words. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Shuqiong & Yue Ou
2023.  A quantitative study of the polysemy of Mandarin Chinese perception verb kàn ‘look/see’ . Australian Journal of Linguistics 43:3 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Poulton, Thomas
2022. Jędrzejowski, Łukasz and Przemysław Staniewski: The linguistics of olfaction: Typological and diachronic approaches to synchronic diversity . Linguistic Typology 26:3 ► pp. 693 ff. DOI logo
SEÇKİN, Kuban
2022. DERLEME SÖZLÜĞÜ’NE GÖRE TÜRKİYE TÜRKÇESİ AĞIZLARINDA “DÜŞÜN-” FİİLİ. Motif Akademi Halk Bilimi Dergisi DOI logo
Backhouse, Anthony E.
2021. How to talk about smell in Japanese. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Bellamy, Kate
2021. Let me count the ways it stinks. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Jędrzejowski, Łukasz & Przemysław Staniewski
2021. Rendering what the nose perceives. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Staniewski, Przemysław & Adam Gołębiowski
2021. To what extent can source-based olfactory verbs be classified as copulas?. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Strik Lievers, Francesca
2021. Smelling over time. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
CABALLERO, ROSARIO & CARITA PARADIS
2020. Soundscapes in English and Spanish: a corpus investigation of verb constructions. Language and Cognition 12:4 ► pp. 705 ff. DOI logo
Caballero, Rosario & Carita Paradis
2025. touch in language. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Hellerstedt, Maria & Rea Peltola
2020. Le chemin de l’audible : la structuration dynamique de la perception par les verbes höras (suédois) et kuulua (finnois) « être audible ». Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 20:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
PROOS, MARIANN
2020. Feeling your neighbour: an experimental approach to the polysemy oftundma‘to feel’ in Estonian. Language and Cognition 12:2 ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Viberg, Åke
2020. Phenomenon-Based Perception Verbs in Swedish from a Typological and Contrastive Perspective. Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 20:1 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Viberg, Åke
2021. Why is smell special?. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Steinbach-Eicke, Elisabeth
2019. Taste metaphors in Hieroglyphic Egyptian. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Peltola, Rea
2018. Being perceptible: Animacy, existentiality and intersubjectivity in constructions with the Finnish verbkuulua‘to be perceptible (through hearing)’. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 41:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Peltola, Rea
2023. Verbalizing animal inner speech. Journal of Pragmatics 217 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. From Pseudo-relatives to Causative Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 278], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue