Article published In: Sensory Perceptions in Language and Cognition
Edited by Rosario Caballero and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 22:1] 2015
► pp. 69–95
Synaesthesia
A corpus-based study of cross-modal directionality
Published online: 1 May 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.1.04str
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.1.04str
In the existing literature on synaesthetic metaphors in poetry it is proposed that transfers tend to go from the ‘lower’ (touch, smell, taste) to the ‘higher’ (sight, hearing) sensory modalities. The purpose of this article is to establish if the same directionality also holds for synaesthetic associations found in other text types. To this end, a method for the semi-automatic extraction of synaesthesia is introduced and applied to general-purpose corpora of English (ukWaC) and Italian (itWaC). In the data collected for these languages, most transfers proceed in the expected direction, e.g. sweet voice, but instances of ‘backward’ transfers are also found, e.g. bitter cold. Based on these results, it is claimed that the ‘directionality principle’ reflects the frequency of association types, rather than representing universal constraints on synaesthetic transfers, as has often been more or less explicitly assumed. It is here argued that both properties of human perception and more strictly linguistic factors can account for the frequency tendencies observed in synaesthesia. The proposed interpretation is also shown to account for apparently contradictory evidence coming from typological studies on verbs of perception.
References (45)
Baroni, Marco, Silvia Bernardini, Adriano Ferraresi & Eros Zanchetta. 2009. The WaCky wide web: A collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation 43(3). 209–226.
Bretones Callejas, Carmen. 2001. Synaesthetic metaphors in English. Technical Reports, TR 01-008. Berkeley: ICSI.
Caballero, Rosario & Ernesto Suárez-Toste. 2006. Acidity is light. Sight metaphors in wine assessment. Actas del XXIV Congreso Internacional de AESLA, 1541–1546. Madrid: UNED.
Cacciari, Cristina. 2008. Crossing the senses in metaphorical language. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 425–443. New York, NY: CUP.
Calvert, Gemma, Charles Spence & Barry E. Stein (eds.). 2004. The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Canobbio, Andrea Tullio. 2004. Trattamento delle sensazioni nella poesia di Guido Gozzano. Genova: University of Genova MA thesis.
Catricalà, Maria. 2012. Sinestesie, monoestesie e linguistica: Temi e problemi. In Maria Catricalà (ed.), 19–51.
Downey, June E. 1912. Literary synesthesia. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 9(18). 490–498.
Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3). 546–592.
Ferraresi, Adriano, Eros Zanchetta, Marco Baroni & Silvia Bernardini. 2008. Introducing and evaluating ukWaC, a very large web-derived corpus of English. In Proceedings of the WAC4 Workshop at LREC 2008. <[URL].
Holz, Peter. 2007. Cognition, olfaction and linguistic creativity: Linguistic synesthesia as poetic device in cologne advertising. In Martina Pluemacher & Peter Holz (eds.), Speaking of colors and odors, 185–202. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kandel, Eric, James Schwartz, Thomas Jessell, Steven Siegelbaum & James Hudspeth. 2012. Principles of neural science. 5th edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Marotta, Giovanna. 2012. Sinestesie tra vista, udito e dintorni: Un’analisi semantica distribuzionale. In Maria Catricalà (ed.), 19–51.
Maslova, Elena. 2004. A universal constraint on the sensory lexicon, or when hear can mean ‘see’? In Aleksandr P. Volodin (ed.), Tipologičeskie obosnovanija v grammatike: k 70-letiju professora Xrakovskogo V.S, 300–312. Moscow: Znak.
Müller, Simone. 2006. Synästhetische Ausdrucksformen in der klassischen japanischen Poesie der Shinkokin-Zeit. In Simone Müller (ed.), Synästhesie und Metaphorik (MOAG 144), 37–59. Hamburg: Gesellschaft für Natur- und Völkerkunde Ostasiens.
O’Malley, Glenn. 1957. Literary synesthesia. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15(4). 391–411.
Paradis, Carita. Forthcoming. Conceptual spaces at work in sensory cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances. In Peter Gärdenfors & Frank Zenker (eds.), Applications of conceptual spaces. The case for geometric knowledge representation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Paradis, Carita & Mats Eeg-Olofsson. 2013. Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews. Metaphor and Symbol 28(1). 22–40.
Popova, Yanna. 2003. ‘The fool sees with his nose’: Metaphoric mappings in the sense of smell in Patrick Süskind’s Perfume
. Language and Literature 12(2). 135–151.
Prandi, Michele. 2004. The building blocks of meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ramachandran, Vilayanur S. & Edward M Hubbard. 2003. The phenomenology of synesthesia. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10(8). 49–57.
Ronga, Irene, Carla Bazzanella, Ferdinando Rossia & Giandomenico Iannetti. 2012. Linguistic synaesthesia, perceptual synaesthesia, and the interaction between multiple sensory modalities. Pragmatics & Cognition 20(1). 135–167.
Shen, Yeshayahu & Michal Cohen. 1998. How come silence is sweet but sweetness is not silent: A cognitive account of directionality in poetic synaesthesia. Language and Literature 7(2). 123–140.
Shen, Yeshayahu & Ravid Aisenman. 2008. ‘Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard are sweeter’: Synaesthesia and cognition. Language and Literature 17(2). 101–121.
Spence, Charles, Cesare Parise & Yi-Chuan Chen. 2012. The Colavita visual dominance effect. In Micah M. Murray & Mark T. Wallace (eds.), The neural bases of multisensory processes, 529–556. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries (eds.). 2006. Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Strik Lievers, Francesca, Xu Hongzhi & Xu Ge. 2013. A methodology for the extraction of lexicalized synaesthesia from corpora. Paper presented at ICL19 (International Congress of Linguists). Geneva, Switzerland, 21-27/7/2013.
Tornitore, Tonino. 2012. Sinestesie del terzo tipo: Proposta minimale di definizione e classificazione. In Maria Catricalà (ed.), 171–180.
. 2001. Verbs of perception. In Martin Haspelmath, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook. Vol. II1. 1294–1309. Berlin: Mouton.
Cited by (55)
Cited by 55 other publications
Azimov Yunus Yusupovich & Yusufzoda Shabnami Yunus
Huang, Chu-Ren, Qingqing Zhao, Kathleen Ahrens, Zhao Wang & Yunfei Long
Kozan, Olena
Wang, Zhao & Qingqing Zhao
Yao, Qing & Haipeng (Allan) Chen
Zhao, Qingqing, Yunfei Long, Xiaotong Jiang, Zhongqing Wang, Chu-Ren Huang & Guodong Zhou
Boieblan, Mostafa
2024. Grounded cognition and the role of musical expertise in shaping synesthetic metaphors among a music speech
community. International Journal of Language and Culture 11:2 ► pp. 180 ff.
Chen, Joanna Zhuoan, Kathleen Ahrens & Dennis Tay
Sanz-Valdivieso, Lucía & Belén López Arroyo
Tóth, Máté
Wen, Han & Shuwen Zheng
Zhong, Yin, Kathleen Ahrens & Chu-Ren Huang
Galac, Ádám & Daler Zayniev
2023. Paths of linguistic synesthesia across cultures. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:2 ► pp. 450 ff.
Winter, Bodo & Francesca Strik-Lievers
2023. Semantic distance predicts metaphoricity and creativity judgments in synesthetic metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World 13:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Fishman, Alon
Jo, Charmhun
Jo, Charmhun
2025. Directionalities of synesthetic mappings in Korean collocations. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 12:2 ► pp. 406 ff.
Winter, Bodo & Mahesh Srinivasan
Winter, Bodo, Márton Sóskuthy, Marcus Perlman & Mark Dingemanse
Zawisławska, Magdalena
Zhao, Qingqing, Kathleen Ahrens & Chu-Ren Huang
Zhao, Qingqing & Yunfei Long
Zhong, Yin, Mingyu Wan, Kathleen Ahrens & Chu-Ren Huang
ÖZKAN KURT, Fatma
BAŞ, Melike
Coschignano, Serena
Jędrzejowski, Łukasz & Przemysław Staniewski
2021. Rendering what the nose perceives. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 1 ff.
Kumcu, Alper
Kumcu, Alper
SPEED, LAURA J.
Viberg, Åke
2021. Why is smell special?. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 35 ff.
Bolognesi, Marianna & Francesca Strik Lievers
CABALLERO, ROSARIO & CARITA PARADIS
Zhao, Qingqing
Zhao, Qingqing
Zhao, Qingqing
Zhao, Qingqing
Zhao, Qingqing, Yunfei Long & Chu-Ren Huang
Caballero, Rosario
2019. Sensory experiences, meaning and metaphor. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 127 ff.
Chen, I-Hsuan, Qingqing Zhao, Yunfei Long, Qin Lu, Chu-Ren Huang & Zhiqiang Cai
Strik Lievers, Francesca & Irene De Felice
2019. Metaphors and perception in the lexicon. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19], ► pp. 85 ff.
Zawisławska, Magdalena & Marta Falkowska
Zhao, Qingqing, Chu-Ren Huang & Kathleen Ahrens
Lupyan, Gary & Bodo Winter
Strik Lievers, Francesca & Bodo Winter
Xiong, Jiajuan & Chu-Ren Huang
Zhao, Qingqing, Chu-Ren Huang & Yunfei Long
Strik Lievers, Francesca
Strik Lievers, Francesca
Strik Lievers, Francesca
2021. Smelling over time. In The Linguistics of Olfaction [Typological Studies in Language, 131], ► pp. 369 ff.
Suárez-Toste, Ernesto
2017. Babel of the senses. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 23:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
