Cover not available

Article published In: Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theoretical developments and directions
Edited by Wendy L. Bowcher and Tom Bartlett
[Functions of Language 28:3] 2021
► pp. 315–341

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Context of situation and the role of language

ORCiD logo with link | Sun Yat-sen University
Published online: 7 April 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20014.bow
Abstract
‘Role’ is typically defined according to the part and/or function that something or someone contributes to a situation. This two-fold perspective is also inherent in discussions of the role of language: the ‘amount’ of language that is involved in a situation and the ‘function’ of language in a situation, with both perspectives relating to the non-linguistic systems that may be involved in the conduct of the situation relative to language. It is the latter of these perspectives, however, that has typically received most attention in discourse analysis, with the former (the ‘amount’) being left implicit and unproblematised. This paper considers the role of language from various discourse analytical perspectives before critically examining the concept within Systemic Functional Linguistics. Using system networks as the representational and analytical platform, the paper redefines ‘role of language’ in contextual Mode as comprised of two sub-systems: degree of involvement and type of involvement. degree of involvement accounts for the compositional contribution that language makes in a situation; type of involvement accounts for the way in which language may function in a situation. Using an illustrative dataset, the paper also demonstrates the effectiveness of the systemic approach in accounting for overlapping and differing contextual configurations by showing how features within the role of language configure and how these in turn configure with options in the Field system-network of action. These configurations are essentially hypotheses that can be more comprehensively tested through empirical research.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Context and the role of language
  • 3.‘Role of language’ in SFL theory
  • 4.Role of language and mode
  • 5.Refining the options in the role of language
    • 5.1Degree of language involvement
    • 5.2Type of language involvement
  • 6.Contextual configurations
    • 6.1Configuration of choices in the role of language
    • 6.2Configuration of choices in role of language with choices in action (Field)
  • 7.Concluding comments
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (48)
References
Bartlett, Tom. 2013. I’ll manage the context: Context, environment, and the potential for institutional change. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 342–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016a. Multiscalar modelling of context: Some questions raised by the category of mode. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), 166–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016b. Phasal dynamism and the unfolding of meaning as text. English Text Construction 9(1). 143–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berry, Margaret. 2016. On describing contexts of situation. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), 184–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowcher, Wendy L. 1999. Investigating institutionalisation in context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 141–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Play-by-play talk on radio: An enquiry into some relations between language and context. Liverpool: University of Liverpool PhD thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Theme and New in play-by-play radio sports commentating. In David Banks (ed.), Text and texture, 455–493. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Field and multimodal texts. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian Matthiessen & Jonathan Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language, 619–646. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Material action as choice in field. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 318–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. The semiotic sense of context vs the material sense of context. Functional Linguistics 5(5). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowcher, Wendy L. & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.). 2016. Society in language, language in society: Essays in honor of Ruqaiya Hasan. London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butt, David G. 2001. Firth, Halliday and the development of systemic functional theory. In Sylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe & Kees Versteegh (eds.), History of the language sciences: An international handbook on the evolution of the study of language from the beginning to the present, 1806–1838. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Parameters of context: On establishing the similarities and differences between social processes. Sydney: Macquarie University unpublished mimeo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. The meaning of a network: Applying the linguistics of Hasan, Halliday, and Lamb. Presentation at Connecting Paths: Lamb, Halliday, and Hasan. Guangzhou, China, Sun Yat-sen University, 3rd November.
Cloran, Carmel. 1999. Context, material situation, and text. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 177–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruse, Alan. 2011. Meaning in Language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. van. 2008. Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.). 2013. Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring choice. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2014. Relevance theory as model for analysing visual and multimodal communication. In David Machin (ed.), Visual Communication, 51–70. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franks, Rachel. 2016. A true crime tale: Re-imagining Governor Arthur’s proclamation to the Aborigines. M/C Journal 18(6). Available online at: [URL]. Accessed 29 Sept. 2020.
Goodwin, Charles. 2017. Co-operative action. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. Part A. In M. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 3–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. The place of dialogue in children’s construction of meaning. In Donna Alvermann, Norman J. Unrau & Robert B. Ruddell (eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, 6th edn., 152–163. Newark: International Reading Association. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., Angus Macintosh & Peter Strevens. 1964. The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longmans.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985. Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1985. Part B. In M. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 51–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 219–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. The place of context in a systemic functional model. In M. A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), The continuum companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics, 166–189. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions and semantics. Functional linguistics 1(9). 1–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2004. Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In David Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, 222–245. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knapp, Mark, Judith Hall & Terrance G. Horgan. 2014. Nonverbal communication in human interaction, 8th edn. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2009. What is Mode? In Carey Jewitt (ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, 54–67. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Design: The rhetorical work of shaping the semiotic world. In Arlene Archer & Denise Newfield (eds.), Multimodal approaches to research and pedagogy, 131–152. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiper, Konraad & Robyn Lewis. 2013. The effect of the broadcast medium on the language of radio and television sports commentary genres: The Rugby Union Lineout. Journal of Sports Media 8(2). 31–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. 1992 [1979]. Activity types and language. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work, 66–100. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinec, Radan & Andrew Salway. 2005. A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication 4(3). 337–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2019. Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 1451. 47–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay. 2015. Multimodal digital humanities. In Peter P. Trifonis (ed.), International handbook of semiotics, 389–415. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Royce, Terry D. 2007. Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In Terry D. Royce & Wendy L. Bowcher (eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse, 63–109. Newark, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1985. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald. 2006. An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wegener, Rebekah. 2019. What makes a text a text? Functions of Language 26(1). 28–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Bateman, John A.
2025. Multimodality writes back. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 7:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wright, David
2025. The Importance of Context in Analysing the Incitement of Violence. In Manipulation, Influence and Deception, ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Junfeng
2025. 2025 4th International Symposium on Computer Applications and Information Technology (ISCAIT), ► pp. 359 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. The Dark Side of Persuasion. In Manipulation, Influence and Deception, ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue