Cover not available

Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 28:2 (2021) ► pp.153–182

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Discourse markers as a lens to variation across speech and writing

Egyptian Arabic yaʕni ‘it means’ as a case study

 | The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Published online: 20 January 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.18025.mar
Abstract
This paper explores the use of the discourse marker (DM) yaʕni (lit. ‘it means’) in spoken and written Egyptian-Cairene Arabic. The DM yaʕni originates in conversational interaction and is symbiotic with its socio-cognitive constraints and goals: it serves to facilitate the verbalization of new or hard-to-activate ideas and to optimize the verbalization of already-introduced ideas, so as to enhance participants’ mutual understanding and involvement. When carried over to written discourse, yaʕni undergoes various forms of adaptation. In casual-personal prose yaʕni is frequently used; however, the distribution of the tokens is different and their function recontextualized. Tokens introducing new ideas are few and acquire symbolic meaning, while tokens introducing elaboration of prior discourse are widely used and serve to evoke conversational interaction. In expository discourse, as reflected in Egyptian Wikipedia data, yaʕni is considerably less frequent and limited to elaborations of concepts and facts. The paper shows the highly context-sensitive function of the DM yaʕni and the ways in which its indexical force, as a marker of conversationality, is either heightened or weakened in writing, depending on the genre in which it is put to use.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discourse types and discourse markers
    • 2.1Spoken and written language
    • 2.2Temporality and interactionality
    • 2.3Discourse markers
  • 3.The corpus: Spoken and written Egyptian-Cairene Arabic
    • 3.1The spoken corpus
    • 3.2The written corpus
  • 4.The DM yaʕni in the spoken corpus
    • 4.1Group A
    • 4.2Group B
    • 4.3Group C
    • 4.4Summary
  • 5.The DM yaʕni in the written corpus
    • 5.1yaʕni in casual-personal prose
    • 5.2yaʕni in Egyptian Wikipedia
  • 6.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (51)
References
ʕAbd al-ʕĀl, Ġada. 2008. ʕĀyza ʔatgawwiz (‘I Want to Get Married’). Cairo: Dār al-šurūq.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2011. Language change and digital media: A review of conceptions and evidence. In Tore Kristiansen & Nikolas Coupland (eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe, 145–161. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
al-ʕAsīlī, Aḥmad. 2009. Kitāb malūš ʔism (‘A Book with No Name’). Cairo: Dār al-šurūq.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2009. On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 311. 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi S. 2008. Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. 2016. Linguistic literacy and later language development. In Joan Perera, Melina Aparici, Elisa Rosado & Naymé Salas (eds.), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan (Literacy Studies 11), 181–200. Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (eds.), 75–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York, NY: Holt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, & Ingrid Van Alphen (eds.). 2012. Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy, 35–53. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2011. Internet linguistics: A student guide. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Jean E. Fox-Tree. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 841. 73–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf & Susanne Günthner. 2015. Introduction: Temporality in interaction. In Arnulf Deppermann & Susanne Günthner (eds.), Temporality in interaction, 1–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara & Andrea Sansò. 2017. Pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal particles: What do we know and where do we go from here? In Chiara Fedriani & Andrea Sansò, Pragmatics markers, discourse markers and modal particles: New perspectives, 1–33. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. 2006. Towards an understanding of the spectrum of approaches to discourse particles. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, 1–20. North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2006. Approaches to discourse particles. North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne & Marina Yaguello. 2004. Discourse markers in comparative perspective: A contribution to cross-language pragmatics. In Carol Lynn Moder & Aida Martinovic-Zic (eds.), Discourse across languages and cultures, 129–147. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson. 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 14–38. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gamāl, Maḥmūd. 2015. 1980 W-inta ṭāliʕ (‘1980 And Onwards’). Cairo: Dār Tūya.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghobrial, Atef N. 1993. Discourse markers in colloquial Cairene Egyptian Arabic: A pragmatic perspective. Boston, MA: Boston University PhD thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles & Alessandro Duranti. 1992. Rethinking context: An introduction. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 1–42. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2006. A dynamic polysemy approach to the lexical semantics of discourse markers (with an exemplary analysis of French toujours). In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 21–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan. C. 1999. Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4(4). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Høigilt, Jacob & Gunvor Mejdell (eds.). 2017. The politics of written language in the Arab world. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Yael Ziv. 1998. Discourse markers: Introduction. In Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory 1–12. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Christa Dürscheid. 2012. The linguistics of keyboard-to-screen communication: A new terminological framework. Linguistik Online 56(6/12). 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanaan, Layal, Véronique Traverso, Loubna Dimachki & Joseph Dichy. 2015. Marqueurs de discours en arabe parlé en interaction: Le cas de ja‘ni. Faits de Langues 451. 199–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
al-Kayyāl, Muna. 2014. Mabrūk il-madām ḥāmil (‘Congratulations! The Lady is Pregnant’). Cairo: Dār uktub.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kindt, Kristian Tokvam and Kebede, Tewodros Aragie. 2017. A language for the people? Quantitative indicators of written dārija and ʕāmmiyya in Cairo and Rabat. In Jacob Høigilt & Gunvor Mejdell (eds.), 18–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 361. 15–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marmorstein, Michal. 2016. Getting to the point: The discourse marker yaʕni (lit. ‘it means’) in unplanned discourse in Cairene Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics 961. 60–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Deborah Schiffrin. 2015. Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 2nd edn, 189–221. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miʕawwaḍ, ʔĪhāb. 2010. Barḍu hatgawwiz tāni (‘Even so, I will Marry a Second Woman’). Cairo: Dār Kayān.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olson, David R. & Nancy Torrance (eds.). 2009. The Cambridge handbook of literacy. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola. 1982. The symbiotic relationship between pragmatic particles and impromptu speech. In Nils E. Enkvist (ed.), Impromptu speech: A symposium (Meddelanden från Stiftelsens för Åbo Akademi Forskiningsinstitut 78), 147–177. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Owens, Jonathan & Trent Rockwood. 2008. Yaʕni: What it (really) means. In Dilworth B. Parkinson (ed.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XXI: Papers from the twenty-first annual symposium on Arabic linguistics, 83–113. Amsterdam: Benjamins, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panovic, Ian. 2010. The beginnings of Wikipedia Masri. Al-Logha 81. 93–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravid, Dorit & Ruth A. Berman. 2006. Information density in the development of spoken and written narratives in English and Hebrew. Discourse Processes 41(2). 117–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Gabriel M. 2012. Modern Egyptian Arabic: From dialect to written language. In Mohamed Meouk, Ángeles Vicente & Pablo Sánchez (eds.), De los manuscritos medievales a internet: La presencia del árabe vernáculo en las fuentes escritas, 359–374. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 531. 361–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Discourse marker research and theory: Revisiting and. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 315–338. North Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence C. 1985. Common discourse particles in English conversation. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Discourse markers: Tutorial overview. Lingua 1071. 227–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1982. Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language 58(1). 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written discourse. In Richard W. Bailey & Robin Melanie Fosheim (eds.), Literacy for life: The demand for reading and writing. New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Marmorstein, Michal
2024. Request for confirmation sequences in Egyptian Arabic. Open Linguistics 10:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue