Review published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 18:2 (2011) ► pp.275–284
Book review
. Processing syntax and morphology: a neurocognitive perspective [Oxford Surveys in Syntax and Morphology, 6]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. xvi+360 pp. ISBN 978-0-19-920781-7(hb)
Reviewed by
Published online: 13 October 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.18.2.07mac
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.18.2.07mac
References (10)
Butler, Christopher S. 2008. Cognitive adequacy in three structural-functional theories of language. Language Sciences 301, 1–30.
Dik, Simon C. 1991. Functional Grammar. In Flip G. Droste & John E. Joseph (eds.), Linguistic theory and grammatical description, 246–274. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fedorenko, Evelina, Po-Jang Hsieh, Alfonso Nieto-Castañón, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli & Nancy Kanwisher. 2010. A new method for fRMI investigations of language: Defining ROIs functionally in individual subjects. Journal of Neurophysiology 1041. 1177–1194.
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2010. More tiles on the roof: further thoughts on incremental language production. In Kasper Boye & Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds.), Language usage and language structure, 263–293. Berlin: Mouton.
Forthcoming. Cognitive adequacy in a dialogic Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences.
Poeppel, David & David Embick. 2005. Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In Anne Cutler (ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: four cornerstones, 103–118. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
