Cover not available

Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 27:2 (2020) ► pp.174–206

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Interacting voices structure a text

A quantitative investigation of dialogic elements across structural units in the introductory chapters of history theses

 | University of New England
Published online: 16 June 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17037.saw
Abstract
This paper quantitatively measures the distribution of dialogic elements across structural units in the introductory chapters of history theses with the aim of uncovering the roles of dialogic elements in constructing texts. The research was designed to test Bakhtin’s perspective on genre, which holds that viewpoints introduced into a discourse dialogise the text in such a way as to fulfil the text’s goals and structure the text. Results showed significant differences in the densities of dialogic elements across structural units; units that review previous research are highly dialogic, whereas units that present the author’s new research are seldom dialogised. Specifically, previous viewpoints tended to be dialogically endorsed in units that assert the importance of the research topic and dialogically disclaimed in units that indicated problems with previous research. The paper concludes that genre research and pedagogy need to emphasise the strategic deployment of dialogic elements that enable the successful structuring of texts. This study is intended to be one of the first methodological attempts to test the text structuring function of dialogic elements from a corpus-based investigation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Materials
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Structural components
    • 3.2Dialogic elements
    • 3.3Coding and statistics
  • 4.Quantitative results and discussion
  • 5.The structural components
    • 5.1Comparison with previous studies
    • 5.2Qualitative observations
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (78)
References
Ädel, Annelie & Anna Mauranen. 2010. Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9(2). 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahmad, Ummul. 1997. Scientific research articles in Malay: A situated discourse analysis. Michigan, MI: University of Michigan PhD thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Charles & Kate Day. 2005. Purposive environments: Engaging students in the values and practices of history. Higher Education 49(3). 319–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Basturkmen, Helen. 2012. A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(2). 134–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1997. Introduction: Genre analysis and world Englishes. World Englishes 16(3). 313–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bitzer, Lloyd F. 1968. The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1(1). 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina & Marc Silver. 2004. Textual voices: A cross-disciplinary study of attribution in academic discourse. In Laurie Anderson & Julia Bamford (eds.), Evaluation in spoken and written academic discourse, 121–141. Roma: Officina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruce, Ian. 2010. Textual and discoursal resources used in the essay genre in sociology and English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(3). 153–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bunton, David. 2002. Generic moves in PhD thesis introductions. In John Flowerdew (ed.), Academic discourse, 57–75. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Wallace Chafe & Joanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, Peichin & Mary Schleppegrell. 2011. Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10(3). 140–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charles, Maggie. 2003. ‘This mystery…’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4). 313–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Fei-Wen & Len Unsworth. 2016. Stance-taking as negotiating academic conflict in applied linguistics research article discussion sections. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 241. 43–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cope, Bill & Mary Kalantzis. 1993. Introduction: How a genre approach to literacy can transform the way writing is taught. In Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis (eds.), The Powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing, 1–21. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotos, Elena, Sarah Huffman & Stephanie Link. 2015. Furthering and applying move/step constructs: Technology-driven marshalling of Swalesian genre theory for EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 191. 52–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressen, Dacia. 2003. Geologists’ implicit persuasive strategies and the construction of evaluative evidence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4). 273–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feak, Christine & John M. Swales. 2011. Creating contexts: Writing introductions across genres. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gil Salom, Luz & Carmen Soler-Monreal (eds.). 2014. Dialogicity in written specialised genres. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas J. 1983. Structural semantics: An attempt at a method. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodge, Bob. 1995. Monstrous knowledge: Doing PhDs in the new humanities. Australian Universities’ Review 38(2). 35–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hood, Susan. 2010. Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, Guangwei & Guihua Wang. 2014. Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 141. 14–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 1993. Professional conflict: Disagreement in academic discourse. In Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology, 115–134. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Geoff Thompson (eds.). 2000. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics 20(3). 341–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics 1131. 16–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Polly Tse. 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25(2). 156–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, Feng & Ken Hyland. 2016. Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics. 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, Renu, Jason Miin-Hwa Lim & Nor Arifah Mohd Nor. 2014. Communicative moves in forestry research introductions: Implications for the design of learning materials. Social and Behavioral Sciences 1341. 53–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2005. Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes 24(3). 269–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Civil engineering research article introductions: Textual structure and linguistic characterisation. Asian ESP Journal 7(2). 55–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lancaster, Zak. 2014. Exploring valued patterns of stance in upper-level student writing in the disciplines. Written Communication 31(1). 27–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno & Woolgar Steve. 1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. Structural anthropology, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. Structural anthropology, Vol. 21. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. Structure and form: Reflections on a work by Vladimir Propp. In Vladimir Propp, Theory and history of folklore, 167–88. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewin, Beverly, Jonathan Fine & Lynne Young. 2001. Expository discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, Jason Miin-Hwa. 2012. How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers’ rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(3). 229–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorés, Rosa. 2004. On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for Specific Purposes 23(3). 280–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyda, Andrzej & Krystyna Warchał. 2014. Occupying niches: Interculturality, cross-culturality and aculturality in academic research. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mansourizadeh, Kobra & Ummul K. Ahmad. 2011. Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10(3). 152–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 2000. Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–175. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Introduction. Text 23(2). 171–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. Language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna & Marina Bondi. 2003. Evaluative language use in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4). 269–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milagros del Saz Rubio, María. 2011. A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of Agricultural Sciences. English for Specific Purposes 30(4). 258–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moghaddasi, Shahin & Heather A. B. Graves. 2017. ‘Since Hadwiger’s conjection … is still open’: Establishing a niche for research in discrete mathematics research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes 451. 69–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nwogu, Kevin N. 1997. The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 201. 28–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael. 2008. UAM corpus tool. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Retrieved from [URL]
Ozturk, Ismet. 2007. The textual organisation of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes 26(1). 25–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paltridge, Brian. 1994. Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries. Applied Linguistics 15(3). 288–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes 21(2). 125–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perkins, Michael. 1983. Modal expressions in English. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir. 1968. The morphology of the folktale. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]
Samraj, Betty. 2002. Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 21(1). 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master’s theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(4). 299–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. On the function of stance-neutral formulations: Apparent neutrality as a powerful stance constructing resource. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 161. 81–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Analysing structure in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silver, Marc & Marina Bondi. 2004. Weaving voices: A study of article openings in historical discourse. In Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti & Elena Tognini Bonelli (eds.), Academic discourse: New insights into evaluation, 141–160. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoller, Fredricka L. & Marin S. Robinson. 2013. Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims. English for Specific Purposes 32(1). 45–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. & Christine Feak. 2012. Academic writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, Sarah & Thomas P. Hawes. 1994. Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 13(2). 129–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2001. Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics 22(1), 58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Yiyun Ye. 1991. Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics 12(4). 365–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Jianglin Zhou. 2000. Evaluation and organization in text: The structuring role of evaluative disjuncts. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 121–141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, Peter R. R. 2012. Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories: Attribution and attitudinal positioning. Discourse, Context & Media 1(2–3). 57–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sawaki, Tomoko
2023. High use of direct questions and relative absence of promotional intention in Japanese peer-reviewed research article introductions compared to their English counterparts. English for Specific Purposes 69 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue