Cover not available

Review published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 17:2 (2010) ► pp.276–294

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

D. Robert Ladd. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. xix+349 pp. ISBN 978-0-521-86117-5(hb) 978-0-521-67836-0(pb) andWinnie Cheng, Chris Greaves & Martin Warren. A corpus-driven study of discourse intonation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2008. x+325 pp. ISBN 978-90-272-2306-7(hb)

Reviewed by
 | Cardiff University
Published online: 3 December 2010
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17.2.08ogr
References (15)
References
Brazil, David. 1995. A grammar of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, Karen L. Currie & Joanne Kenworthy. 1980. Questions of intonation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic systems in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1984. On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Dordrect: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1970. A course in spoken English: Intonation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & William S. Greaves. 2008. Intonation in the grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard. 2010. A grammar of spoken English discourse: The intonation of increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pickering, Brian, Briony Williams & Gerry Knowles. 1996. Analysis of transcriber differences in the SEC. In Gerry Knowles, Anna Wichmann & Peter Alderson (eds.) Working with speech: Perspectives on research into the Lancaster/IBM Spoken English Corpus, 61–86. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Julia Hirschberg. 1990. The meaning of intonation contours in the intrepretation of discourse. In Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds.). Intentions in communication, 271–312. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John M. & Anna Mauranen. 2007. Linear Unit Grammar: Intergrating speech and writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tench, Paul. 1996. The intonation systems of English. London: Cassell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanderslice, Ralph & Laura S. Pierson. 1967. Prosodic features of Hawaiian English. Reprinted in Dwight Bolinger. (1972). Intonation, 439–450. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Moneglia, Massimo & Giorgina Cantalini
2025. Prosodic synchrony and the semantic affiliation of gestures in the multimodal utterance. Journal of Speech Sciences 14 ► pp. e025011 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue