Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 17:1 (2010) ► pp.1–28
The multifunctionality of epistemic parentheticals in discourse
Prosodic cues to the semantic-pragmatic boundary
Published online: 6 July 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17.1.01deh
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17.1.01deh
The aim of this study is to identify the relation between the interpretation of epistemic parentheticals in discourse and their prosodic realisation. Data drawn from a corpus of British English speech suggests that epistemic parentheticals (comment clauses such as I think, I believe) convey a spectrum of meaning from propositional to interpersonal. They have long been categorised simply as sentence adverbials with a meaning that relates to the truth value of the proposition. However, a study of their prosodic realisation suggests that they occupy a transitional place in the process of semantic change. They can express a wide range of meanings from propositional (sentential) meaning, through discourse meaning to the status of verbal filler. The analysis draws on theories of discourse, historical change and prosody. It makes an important contribution to the understanding of how prosody conveys apparently subtle shades of meaning that are nonetheless crucial for utterance interpretation, including degrees of speaker certainty, the identification of disfluency and the expression of politeness.
Cited by (38)
Cited by 38 other publications
Cabrera-Abreu, Mercedes & Eva Estebas-Vilaplana
2025. An exploration into modality, interpersonal meanings and intonation in peer interaction. Spanish in Context
Ghezzi, Chiara
Vercellotti, MaryLou & Sean Hall
Çeltek, Aytaç
2024. The functions of “I think” in TED Talks and their Turkish translations. Pragmatics & Cognition 31:2 ► pp. 391 ff.
Dendale, Patrick, Anne Vanderheyden & Melissa Schuring
Freitag, Raquel Meister Ko., Paloma Batista Cardoso & Julian Tejada
2022. Linguistic and paralinguistic constraints on the function of(eu) acho queas DM in Brazilian Portuguese. Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2 ► pp. 324 ff.
Kojadinović, Zlatan
Merino Hernández, Laura M.
Debras, Camille
Shan, Yi
Shan, Yi
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Sophia Fiedler
Dehé, Nicole
Enghels, Renata
Jee Won Lee
Jiang, Zhanhao & Yuan Tao
Gentens, Caroline
Gentens, Caroline, Ditte Kimps, Kristin Davidse, Gilles Jacobs, An Van linden & Lieselotte Brems
2016. Mirativity and rhetorical structure. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 125 ff.
Haselow, Alexander
Haselow, Alexander
Hennemann, Anja
Põldvere, Nele, Matteo Fuoli & Carita Paradis
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2016. On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
HANOTE, Sylvie
Maschler, Yael & Deborah Schiffrin
Plug, Leendert
Soltic, Jorie
2015. Parenthetical “I say (you)” in Late Medieval Greek vernacular. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Shelley Staples
2014. Exploring the prosody of stance. In Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 61], ► pp. 271 ff.
Güneş, Güliz
Langacker, Ronald W.
2014. Subordination in a dynamic account of grammar. In Contexts of Subordination [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 249], ► pp. 17 ff.
Travis, Catherine E. & Rena Torres Cacoullos
Jalilifar, Alireza & Maryam Alavi-Nia
Schoonjans, Steven
Auran, Cyril & Rudy Loock
Bolly, Catherine
Bolly, Catherine
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
