Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 16:2 (2009) ► pp.225–263
Knowledge moves in conversational exchanges
Revisiting the concept of primary vs. secondary knowers
Published online: 22 October 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.2.03mun
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.2.03mun
In Berry’s (1981) classic work on exchange structure, it was argued that knowledge exchanges consist of some conversational participant who already knows the information and some conversational participant to whom the information is imparted. The former participant is commonly termed the primary knower, whereas the latter is termed the secondary knower. What is missing in Berry’s model (and work that has extended Berry’s model), however, is (1) an explanation of how rights and access to knowledge can be claimed or resisted on a turn-by-turn and move-by-move basis, and (2) a more elaborated conception of knowledge that goes beyond a sender/receiver model of information. Drawing from a corpus of spoken conversation from diverse sources, I extend Berry’s model by showing how a participant’s ‘knower status’ is often negotiated within an exchange. As an interpersonal resource, knowledge can be asserted, challenged, resisted, accepted, expanded, upgraded, downgraded, etc. Furthermore, I argue that ‘knowledge’ should be given a social/practical epistemological interpretation; from this perspective, knowledge is associated with a speaker’s degree of access to information and with a speaker’s rights and obligations to know.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Doran, Y. J., J. R. Martin & Michele Herrington
Giacosa, Antonella
Berry, Margaret & Sarah Jane Mukherjee
2022. Exchange Structure: Refinements to the model through a study of multiparty discourse of 4 to 5 year-old children. Functions of Language 29:3 ► pp. 253 ff.
Bartlett, Tom
Elorza, Izaskun, Jorge Arús-Hita & Tom Bartlett
Yuan, Chuanyou & Xing Luo
2021. A negotiation analysis of risk assessment in community correction from the perspective of exchange structure. Language and Dialogue 11:2 ► pp. 200 ff.
Zhang, Dongbing
O’Grady, Gerard
2020. Is there a role for prosody within register studies. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 2:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
O’Grady, Gerard
Kimps, Ditte, Kristin Davidse & Gerard O’Grady*
Martin, James R.
2019. Once more with feeling. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 1:2 ► pp. 234 ff.
Berry, Margaret
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
