Cover not available

Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 24:3 (2017) ► pp.259–293

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Bridging boundaries across genre traditions

A Systemic Functional account of generic patterns in biodata

 | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | University of Cape Coast
Published online: 9 February 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.15017.mwi
Abstract
This study explores the benefits of a synergy between ESP research on genre and theoretical dimensions of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). It models genre on SFL dimensions and employs this model to analyse 200 biodata written by Applied Linguistics scholars, 100 each from research articles and seminar posters. Data were analysed from contextual, logico-semantic and lexicogrammatical perspectives. The findings reveal five generic stages in biodata. The frequency distribution of these stages and the phases that realise them shows variation between research article bios and seminar bios. The most frequent logico-semantic (or rhetorical) relations identified among stages and phases are of the expansion type, namely addition and elaboration, Further, collocational frameworks are used in organising some generic phases into waves of meaning and in construing different identities. Finally, evaluative resources, in the form of lexical bundles, modification and circumstantial elements in the clause, are employed by writers to boost their professional achievements and promote themselves. These findings contribute to theoretical discussions on genre and the scholarship on the interface between identity construction and academic writing, and also motivate further research.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Contextualising biodata in academic writing
  • 3.Modelling genre on Systemic Functional dimensions
  • 4.Data and method
    • 4.1The corpus of biodata
    • 4.2Analytical procedures
  • 5.Generic patterns of biodata
    • 5.1Generic structure potential of biodata
    • 5.2Sequencing of stages
    • 5.3Rhetorical/logico-semantic relations
    • 5.4Lexicogrammatical patterns of biodata
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (90)
References
Achugar, Mariana & Brian D. Carpenter. 2014. Tracking movement toward academic language in multilingual classrooms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 141. 60–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Afful, Joseph B. Archibald. 2012. Structure of reference lists in doctoral theses: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes World 34(12). 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Self-representation in bio statements in a festschrift at a Ghanaian University. Drumspeak 5(1). 102–138.
Afful, Joseph B. Archibald & Hilary Janks. 2013. The politics of citation: An analysis of doctoral theses across disciplines. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 6(2). 193–210.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Afful, Joseph B. Archibald & Isaac N. Mwinlaaru. 2010. Commonality and individuality in academic writing: An analysis of conference paper titles of four scholars. English for Specific Purposes World 1(27). 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Sub-disciplinary variation and rhetoric in dissertation acknowledgements written by education students: The case of the University of Cape Coast, Ghana. In Domwin D. Kuupole & Moses K. Kambou (eds.), National development through language education, 79–111. Cape Coast: Cape Coast University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Azar, M. 1999. Argumentative text as rhetorical structure: An application of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Argumentation 13(1). 97–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babaii, Esmat. 2010. Opting out or playing the ‘academic game’? Professional identity construction by off-center academics. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 4(1). 93–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateman, John, Thomas Kamps, Jorg Kleinz & Klaus Reichenberger. 2001. Towards constructive text, diagram and layout generation for information presentation. Computational Linguistics 27(3). 409–449. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Ibérica 41. 3–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Worlds of written discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Towards critical genre analysis. In Vijay Bhatia, John Flowerdew & Rodney H. Jones (eds.), Advances in discourse studies, 166–177. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cloran, Carmel, Lynne Young & Virginia Stuart-Smith. 2007. Models of discourse. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective (Vol. 21), 645–668. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Stephen. 2012. Designing email tasks for the business English classroom: Implications from a study of Hong Kong’s key industries. English for Specific Purposes 31(3). 202–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Designing tasks for the business English classroom. ELT Journal 67(3). 281–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firkins, Arthur, Gail Forey & Sima Sengupta. 2007. A genre-based approach: Teaching writing to low proficiency EFL students. ELT Journal 64(1). 341–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, Lynne. 2000. Using a genre-based framework to teach organisational structure in academic writing. ELT Journal 54(4). 369–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frow, John. 2006. Genre. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genette, Gerard. 1987. Introduction to the paratexts. Reprinted in translation by M. Maclean. 1991. New Literary History 22(2). 261–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gesuato, Sara. 2009. Encoding of information in titles: Practices across four genres in linguistics. In Christopher Taylor (ed.), Ecolingua: The role of e-corpora in translation and language learning, 127–157. Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannoni, Davide S. 1998. The genre of journal acknowledgements: Findings of a cross-disciplinary investigation. Linguistica e Filologia 61. 61–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greaves, Chris & Martin Warren. 2010. What can a corpus tell us about multi-word units? In Anne O’Keeffe & Michael McCarthy (eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics, 212–226. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. Introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. The notion of ‘context’ in language education. In Thao Le & Mike McCausland (eds.), Interaction and development: Proceedings of the international conference, 1–26. Launceston: University of Tasmania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. On grammar and grammatics. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David Butt (eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory into practice, 1–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Linguistics as metaphor. In Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Kristin Davidse & Dirk Noël (eds.), Reconnecting language: Morphology and syntax in functional perspectives, 3–27. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. On matter and meaning: The two realms of human experience. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 1(1). 59–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Complementarities in language. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., Angus McIntosh & Peter Strevens. 1964. The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985. Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang & Sarah E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9). 1277–1288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2004. Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 131. 133–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011a. Projecting an academic identity in some reflective genres. Ibérica 211. 9–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. The presentation of self in scholarly life: Identity and marginalisation in academic homepages. English for Specific Purposes 301. 286–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Liz Hamp-Lyons. 2002. EAP: Issues and directions. English for Academic Purposes 11. 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Polly Tse. 2012. ‘She has received many honours’: Identity construction in article bio statements. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 111. 155–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyon, Sunny. 1996. Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 30(4). 693–722. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jalilifar, Alireza. 2009. Submission letters across English Language Teaching and mathematics: The case of Iranian professionals. English Language Teaching 2(3). 80–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilpert, Diana. 2003. Getting the full picture: A reflection on the work of M.A.K. Halliday. Language Sciences 251. 159–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lejeune, Philippe. 1975. Le Pacte autobiographique. Paris: Seuils, coll. Poétique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewin, Beverly A. & Jonathan Fine. 1996. The writing of research texts: Genre analysis and its implications. In Gert Rijlaarsdam, Huub van den Bergh & Michel Couzijn (eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research, 423–444. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Ling & Stephen Evans. 2012. Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes 31(3). 150–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1923. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Charles Kay Ogden & Ivar Armstrong Richards (eds.), The meaning of meaning, 146–152. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1935. Coral gardens and their magic: A study of the methods of tilling the soil and of agricultural rites in the trobriand islands (vol. 11). Hamburg: Severus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, William C. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text 8(3). 243–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, William C., Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Sandra A. Thompson. 1992. Rhetorical Structure Theory and text analysis. In William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund raising text, 39–78. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Frances Christie & Joan Rothery. 1987. Social processes in education: A reply to Sawyer and Watson (and others). In Ian Reid (ed.), The place of genre in learning: Current debates, 46–57. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & David Rose. 2007. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause, 2nd edn. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York, NY: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2007. The “architecture” of language according to systemic functional theory: Developments since the 1970. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language (vol. 21), 505–561. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013a. Applying Systemic Functional Linguistics in healthcare contexts. Text & Talk 33(4–5). 437–467.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013b. Appliable discourse analysis. In Fang Yan & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Developing systemic functional linguistics: Theory and application, 135–205. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
manuscript. Rhetorical system and structure theory: The semantic system of RHETORICAL RELATIONS. Department of English, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
2015a. Register in the round: Registerial cartography. Functional Linguistics 2(9).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015b. Modelling context and register: The long‐term project of registerial cartography. Letras 501. 15–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Kazuhiro Teruya. 2014. Rhetorical relations and their lexicogrammatical realisations in different registers. Paper presented at the 25th European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference [ESFLC], Université Paris Diderot, Paris. July 10–12.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Licheng Zeng, Marilyn Cross, Ichiro Kobayashi, Kazuhiro Teruya & Canzhong Wu. 1998. The Multex Generator and its environment: Application and development. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Natural Language Generation, 228–237.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 701. 151–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway (eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric, 67–78. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mwinlaaru, Isaac N. 2014. Promotional discourse in academic writing: Generic patterns of biodata. Paper presented at the 2nd Asia-Pacific Corpus Linguistics Conference [APCLC], The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, March 7–9.
Ngo, Thu & Len Unsworth. 2015. Reworking the appraisal framework in ESL research: Refining attitude resources. Functional Linguistics 2(1). 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paltridge, Brian. 2015. Referees’ comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: When is a suggestion not a suggestion? Studies in Higher Education 40(1). 106–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkinson, Jean & Jill Musgrave. 2014. Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for academic purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 141. 48–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renouf, Antoinette J. & John McH Sinclair. 1991. Collocational frameworks in English. In Karin Ajimer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics, 128–143. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, David & J. R. Martin. 2012. Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santos, Mauro Bittencourt dos. 1996. The textual organisation of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text 16(4). 481–499.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, Rita. 2004. Stylistic features of academic speech: The role of formulaic expressions. In Ulla Connor & Thomas A. Upton (eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics, 37–64. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1981. Aspects of article introductions. Aston ESP Research Report No.1. Language Studies Unit, University of Aston, Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996. Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In Eija Ventola & Anna Mauranen (eds), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues, 45–58. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Worlds of genre – metaphors of genre. In Charles Bazerman, Adair Bonini & Débora Figueiredo (eds.), Genre in a changing world, 3–16. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse & Parlor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite & William C. Mann. 2006a. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies 8(3). 423–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. Applications of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Discourse Studies 8(4). 567–588. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul & Chris Tribble. 2001. Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology 5(3). 91–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trail, Ronald L. & Austin Hale. 1995. A rhetorical structure analysis of a Kalasha Narrative. Horsleys Green: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vander Linden, Keith & J. R. Martin. 1995. Expressing rhetorical relations in instructional text: A case study of the purpose relation. Computational Linguistics 21(1). 29–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warren, Martin. 2009. Why concgram? In Chris Greaves, Concgram 1.0: A phraseological search engine, 1–11. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Preparation is everything: Meetings in professional contexts in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes 361. 12–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, Xunfeng, Yan Wang, Gail Forey & Lan Li. 2010. Analyzing the genre structure of Chinese call-center communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 24(4). 445–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

E.M., Bonsu & Afful J.B.A.
2022. Genre Analysis of Abstracts of Research Articles Published in Biostatistics. International Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue