Cover not available

Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 24:3 (2017) ► pp.319–347

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Measuring iconicity

A quantitative study of lexical and analytic causatives in British English

 | Leipzig University
Published online: 9 February 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.15013.lev
Abstract
The idea of isomorphism of form and meaning has played an important role in functionalist theories of syntax and morphology. However, there have been few studies that test this hypothesis empirically on quantitative data. This study aims to fill this gap by testing the predictions made by iconicity theory with the help of statistical hypothesis-testing techniques. The paper focuses on a subtype of isomorphism, namely iconicity of cohesion. The analyses are based on a sample of lexical and analytic causatives from the British National Corpus. The study employs three different operationalisations of the degree of semantic cohesion of the causing and caused events, which are based on English and cross-linguistic data. The form-function correlation is interpreted from the point of view of three possible models of relationships between form, function and/or frequency.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Iconicity theory and causatives
  • 3.Analytic and lexical causatives in the British National Corpus: Description of the comparative concepts and the sample
    • 3.1Definition of analytic and lexical causatives
    • 3.2The sample
  • 4.Lexical vs. analytical causatives: Do semantic classes of causative events matter?
  • 5.Corpus-driven variable: Causal/non-causal alternation in English
  • 6.Cross-linguistic evidence: Inchoative-causative alternation
  • 7.Discussion: The form-meaning correlation and how to explain it
  • 8.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Corpus
  • References
References (52)
Corpus
The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition). 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Available online at [URL].
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Transitivity in Tariana. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), 145–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amberber, Menigstu. 2000. Valency-changing and valency-encoding devices in Amharic. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), 312–332.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2010. Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause-hierarchy and clause-linking: The syntax and pragmatics interface, 51–101. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Diagrammatic iconicity in stem – inflection relations. In John Haiman (ed.), 11–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Markedness: Iconicity, economy and frequency. In J. Jung Song (ed.), Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 131–147. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Sandra Thomspon. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure, 378–388. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Maria Polinsky (eds.). 1993. Causatives and transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2007. Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology 251. 108–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Iconicity of sequence. A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics 191. 457–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). 2000. Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John. 1985. Competing motivations. In John Haiman (ed.), 343–365.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1970. Three reasons for not deriving “kill” from “cause to die.” Linguistic Inquiry 1(4). 429–438.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol. II1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59(4). 781–819. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 1985. Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), 87–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Universals of causative verb formation. Paper presented at LSA Institute, MIT, LSA.206, 2 August 2005.
. 2008a. Creating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic Universals and Language Change, 185–214. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3). 663–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Andreea Calude, Michael Spagnol, Heiko Narrog & Elif Bamyaci. 2014. Coding causal – noncausal verb alternations: A form – frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 501. 587–625. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne. 1982. How to cause in Mixtec. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society, 354–363.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hollmann, Willem B. 2004. The iconicity of infinitival complementation in Present-day English causatives. In Constantino Maeder, Olga Fischer, & William J. Herlofsky (eds.), Outside-in – inside-out: Iconicity in language and literature, 287–306. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Sandra Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne & Arie Verhagen. 1994. The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events. Cognitive Linguistics 51. 115–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 1993. The “second causative”: A typological sketch. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), 121–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randi J. 2000. Valency-changing derivations in Dulong/Rawang. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), 282–311.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappoport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015b. European analytic causatives as a comparative concept: Evidence from a parallel corpus of film subtitles. Folia Linguistica 49(2). 487–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Why we need a token-based typology: A case study of analytic and lexical causatives in fifteen European languages. Folia Linguistica 50(2). 507–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Wilson. 2001. Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1969. Nekotoryje verojatnostnyje universalii v glagol’nom slovoobrazonanii [Some probabilistic universals in verbal derivation]. In I. F. Vardul’ (ed.), Jazykovyje universalii i lingvističeskaja tipologija, 106–114. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1976. Kausativkonstruktionen. Tübingen: TBL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patterson, Betty S. J. 1974. A study of Korean causatives. Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics 6(4). 1–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piantadosi, Steven T., Harry Tilly & Edward Gibson. 2011. Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. PNAS 108(9). 3526–3529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette. 2003. Aspects of iconicity and economy in the choice between the s-genitive and the of-genitive in English. In Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 379–411. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2005. New York, Dayton (Ohio), and the Raw Frequency Fallacy. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1–2. 295–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steger, Maria & Edgar W. Schneider. 2012. Complexity as a function of iconicity: The case of complement clause constructions in New Englishes. In Bernd Kortmann & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds.), Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact, 156–191. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, John. 2012. The Mental Corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie & Suzanne Kemmer. 1997. Interaction and causation: Causative constructions in modern standard Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics 241. 61–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zipf, George K. 1949. Human behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

SCHNEIDER, ULRIKE
2023. Reflexive analytic causatives: a diachronic analysis of transitivity parameters. English Language and Linguistics 27:4 ► pp. 789 ff. DOI logo
Uljas, Sami
2021. Iconicity and Semantic-Structural Mapping in Earlier Egyptian Complementation. Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies :29 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue