Diane Blakemore. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. viii + 200 pp. ISBN 0 521 64007 5

Reviewed by

Patrick Goethals | Hogeschool Gent

Published online: 12 May 2004

https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.10.2.08goe

References (7)

References

Bach, K. (1999). The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 221: 327–366.

Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.

Goethals, P. (2002). Las conjunciones causales explicativas españolas como, ya que, pues y porque: Un estudio semiótico-lingüistico. Leuven: Peeters.

Grice, H. P. (1968/1989). Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning, and word-meaning. In Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Holdcroft, D. (1992) Searle on conversation and structure. In H. Parret, and J. Verschueren (eds.) (On) Searle on Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 57–76.

Rieber, S. (1997). Conventional implicatures as tacit performatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 201: 50–72.

Wilson, D. and D. Sperber. (1990). Forme linguistique et pertinence. Cahiers de Linguistique française 261: 13–35.

Diane Blakemore. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. viii + 200 pp. ISBN 0 521 64007 5

Diane Blakemore. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. viii + 200 pp. ISBN 0 521 64007 5