Cover not available

Introduction published In: Today’s Innovations, Tomorrow’s Conventions: Usage-based approaches to incipient developments in English
Edited by David Lorenz and David Tizón-Couto
[Functions of Language 32:1] 2025
► pp. 3–15

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
Introduction

Today’s innovations, tomorrow’s conventions

Usage-based approaches to incipient developments in English

ORCiD logo with link | Lunds universitet
ORCiD logo with link | Universidade de Vigo
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

For the work relating to this article and the Special Issue, we have received funding through grant PID2020-118143GA-I00, awarded by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Lund University.

Published online: 16 May 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.00067.lor
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Innovation and convention as a research topic
  • 3.Synopsis of the contributions
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (43)
References
Anttila, Raimo. 2003. Analogy: The warp and woof of cognition. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 425–440. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter & Stefan Pfänder. 2011. Constructions: Emergent or emerging? In Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emergent and emerging, 1–21. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balog, Evelin. 2023. Entrenchment revisited: Some old and new concepts and their empirical validation. Erlangen: Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg PhD dissertation. Available online at [URL]
Bergs, Alexander & Nikola Anna Kompa. 2020. Creativity within and outside the linguistic system. Cognitive Semiotics 13(1). 20202025. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice. 2012. Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Richard L. File-Muriel & Ricardo Napoleão de Souza. 2016. Special reduction: a usage-based approach. Language and Cognition 81. 421–446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2010. The origins of grammaticalization in the verbalization of experience. Linguistics 48(1). 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2016. How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change 281. 83–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Entrenchment from a psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic perspective. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning, 75–99. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn & Kristel Van Goethem. 2018. The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation. Cognitive Linguistics 29(2). 197–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2019. The grammar network. How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dietrich, Nadine. 2024. The seamlessness of grammatical innovation: the case of be going to (revisited). Folia Linguistica Historica 58(s45–s1). 149–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2000. Grammaticalisation: unidirectional, non-reversable? The case of to before the infinitive in English. In Annette Rosenbach, Olga Fischer & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change. Grammaticalization in English, 149–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. An analogical approach to grammaticalization. In Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler, & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization. Current views and issues, 181–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaglia, Sascha. 2020. The dynamics of analogy: Old French and Old Italian verbal roots. Lingue e Linguaggio 1/20201. 61–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillmann, Melitta. 2021. Analogy as driving force of language change: a usage-based approach to wo and da clauses in 17th and 18th century German. Cognitive Linguistics 32(3). 421–453. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1995. The diachronic typological approach to language. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Theodora Binon (eds.), Approaches to language typology, 145–166. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva, & Haiping Long. 2017. Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics 55(4). 1–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2019. Chapter 5: Historical linguistics. In Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics — A survey of linguistic subfields, 108–132. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & David Correia Saavedra. 2018. The unidirectionality of semantic changes in grammaticalization: An experimental approach to the asymmetric priming hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics 22(3). 357–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa. 2013. Functional explanation and its uses. In Shannon T. Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds.), Functional approaches to language, 31–70. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1998. Emergent Grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, Vol.11, 155–175. Englewood Cliffs: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On language change: The invisible hand in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2012. Grammaticalization as optimization. In Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes, 15–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Meili, Hubert Cuyckens & Fangqiong Zhan. 2025. Language change in a constructional network: The emergence of Mandarin [bi N hai N] comparative constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 36(1). 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López-Couso, Maria José & Javier Pérez-Guerra. 2023. Promoting and inhibiting forces at work: A corpus-based analysis of negative contraction in the recent history of English. In Hendrik De Smet, Peter Petré & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds.), Context, intent and variation in grammaticalization, 189–214. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenz, David & David Tizón-Couto. 2020. Not just frequency, not just modality: Production and perception of English semi-modals. In Pascal Hohaus & Rainer Schulze (eds.), Re-assessing modalising expressions. Categories, co-text and context, 79–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024. Coalescence and contraction of V-to-Vinf sequences in American English — Evidence from spoken language. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20(1). 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian & Geoffrey Leech. 2006. Current changes in English syntax. In: Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 318–342. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neels, Jakob & Stefan Hartmann. 2022. Grammaticalisation, schematisation and paradigmaticisation: How they intersect in the development of German degree modifiers. In Gabriele Diewald & Katja Pollitt (eds.), Paradigms regained: Theoretical and empirical arguments for the reassessment of the notion of paradigm, 267–196. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden. 2011. Introduction: Reflections on motivation revisited. In Klaus-Uwe Panther & Günter Radden (eds.), Motivation in grammar and the lexicon, 1–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina (ed.). 2015. Can we predict linguistic change? (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 16). Helsinki: VARIENG. [URL]
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system. Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seitanidi, Eleni, Nele Põldvere & Carita Paradis. 2024. Everything-cleft constructions in spoken British English: A neglected construction. Functions of Language 31(3). 289–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect? In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek. 2017. Understanding grammar at the community level requires a diachronic perspective. Nederlandse Taalkunde 22(1). 47–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vartianinen, Turo. 2016. A constructionist approach to category change: constraining factors in the adjectivization of participles. Journal of English Linguistics 44(1). 34–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue