Cover not available

Article published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 26:3 (2019) ► pp.275–307

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Evidentiality in adverbs of manner of perceivability

The case of English manifestly, noticeably, patently and visibly

 | Complutense University of Madrid
Published online: 25 November 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.00024.car
Abstract
This paper presents an analysis of the expression of evidentiality by the English adverbs manifestly, noticeably, patently and visibly (MNP&V). I propose that the adverbs have a meaning of manner and an evidential meaning, and that both meanings often coexist, in which case evidentiality is shown to be a pragmatic implication of the meaning of manner. An account is provided of the factors of the linguistic context that trigger MNP&V’s evidential meaning, as a single meaning or as an implication: propositional scope, realis assertion, no premodification by degree adverbs mapping on to a construal of totality and no coordination with adverbs of manner. Position is also shown to strengthen or weaken the evidential implication when MNP&V have syntactic clausal scope. The evidentiality expressed by MNP&V is also characterised according to mode of access, domain, subjectivity and reliability. The adverbs have been submitted to a quantitative analysis of all their occurrences in the British National Corpus; the results show that MNP&V are evidential by implication in most cases, and also uncover individual differences in features such as position and domain of evidence and in the extent to which each adverb can be considered as an evidential expression.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and structure of the paper
  • 2.The data analysed
  • 3.The concept and scope of evidentiality
  • 4.A description of MNP&V
    • 4.1The selection of MNP&V for the study
    • 4.2The dictionary meanings of MNP&V
    • 4.3MNP&V in the literature
    • 4.4MNP&V’s meaning of manner
    • 4.5MNP&V’s evidential meaning
    • 4.6Coexistence of the two meanings
  • 5.Qualitative analysis of the evidential meanings of MNP&V
    • 5.1Criteria for distinguishing evidential and non-evidential occurrences
      • 5.1.1Witnessing of evidence and realis assertion
      • 5.1.2Temporal location of the proposition
      • 5.1.3Modifiers of degree
      • 5.1.4Coordination with evidential adverbs and with adverbs of manner
      • 5.1.5Position
      • 5.1.6Recapitulation of the criteria
    • 5.2Parameters of evidentiality
      • 5.2.1Mode of access to the evidence
      • 5.2.2Domains of evidence
      • 5.2.3Intersubjectivity
      • 5.2.4Evaluation of the evidence: High reliability
  • 6.The quantitative analysis
    • 6.1The database
    • 6.2Results and discussion
  • 7.Conclusions and suggestions for further research
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Primary sources
  • References
References (43)
Primary sources
The Cambridge Dictionary: [URL]
Collins English Dictionary: [URL]
WordReference.com English dictionary: [URL]
Oxford English Dictionary: [URL]
References
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), 273–312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 43). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder. 2009. Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language 16(1). 9–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carretero, Marta. 2004. The role of evidentiality and epistemic modality in three English spoken texts from legal proceedings. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese (ed.), 25–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Subjectivity in epistemic modality: A two-resource based approach. BELL New Series 51. 97–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carretero, Marta & Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla. 2013. Annotating English adverbials for the categories of epistemic modality and evidentiality. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), 317–355.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Celle, Agnès. 2009. Hearsay adverbs and modality. In Raphael Salkie, Pierre Bussutil & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Modality in English: Theory and description, 268–293. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace & Johanna Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corum, Claudia. 1975. A pragmatic analysis of parenthetic adjuncts. CLS 111. 133–141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuartero Sánchez, Juan M. 2011. Notoriamente y otros adverbios modales de valoración epistémica. Español actual 961. 41–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand. 2005. Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges and David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 379–397. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik & Jean-Christophe Verstraete. 2006. Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 171. 365–392.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar. Part I: The structure of the clause, 2nd edn. Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English adverbial usage. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guimier, Claude. 1986. Syntaxe de l’adverbe anglais. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haβler, Gerda. 2008. Recursos evidenciales en las lenguas romances: Un estudio funcional y comparativo. In Francisco M. Carriscondo Esquivel & Carsten Sinner (eds.), Lingüística española contemporánea: Enfoques y soluciones, 225–243. München: Anja Gärtig Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura. 2004. Non-verbal markers of modality and evidentiality and the expression of writer stance in a comparable corpus of English and Spanish editorials and news articles. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese (ed.), 205–228.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lampert, Guenther. 2014. (Dis-)embodiment, palpability, and cognitive state. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics 4(2). 1–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana I. 2007. Stance and subjectivity / intersubjectivity in political discourse: A contrastive case study. BELL New Series 51. 113–132.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Stancetaking and inter-subjectivity in the Iraq Inquiry: Blair vs. Brown. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), 411–445.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2004. Perspectives on evidentiality and modality. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana I., Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds.). 2013. English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. The “one-commitment-per-clause” principle and the cognitive status of qualificational categories. Linguistics 471. 141–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan & Wietske Vonk. 1999. Epistemic modality and focus in Dutch. Linguistics 371. 699–737. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree modifiers of adjectives in spoken British English. Lund: Lund UP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. It’s well weird. Degree modifiers of adjectives revisited. In John M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English, 147–160. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 2008. Almost certainly and most definitely: Degree modifiers and epistemic stance. Journal of Pragmatics 401. 1521–1542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Karin Aijmer. 2007. The semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stillar, Glenn. 1998. Analyzing everyday texts: Discourse, rhetoric and social perspectives. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1988. Sentence adverbials in English: A synchronic and diachronic investigation. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Katerina Stathi. 2010. The database of evidential markers in European languages: A bird’s eye view of the conception of the database (the template and the problems hidden beneath it). STUF 63(4). 275–289.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

He, Zhongqing & Haowen Zhou
2025. “Figure 2 shows that …”: Evidentiality in Chinese graduate students’ research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 75 ► pp. 101507 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Bingzhuan
2024. Subjectivity of Discourse Constructions in News Discourse by Integrating Construction Grammar and Critical Discourse Analysis. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Carretero, Marta, Juana I. Marín-Arrese & Anna Ruskan
2022. Epistemicity and stance in English and other European languages: Discourse-pragmatic perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics 190 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Dendale, Patrick, Anne Vanderheyden & Melissa Schuring
2022. Visiblement , adverbe de phrase évidentiel ou visiblement , adverbe de constituant exprimant la manière. La prosodie comme nouveau critère. Langages N° 227:3 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Kemp, Lois & Kees Hengeveld
2022. English evidential -lyadverbs in the noun phrase from a functional perspective. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 573 ff. DOI logo
Ruskan, Anna
2021. Visual perception-based adverbials: Cross-linguistic equivalence and differences. Journal of Pragmatics 186 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Carretero, Marta
2020. Epistentiality, manner and dialogic contraction: The case of English clearly and Spanish claramente. Journal of Pragmatics 169 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Carretero, Marta
2023. Knowledge and belief in the times of COVID-19: A comparative analysis of epistemicity in English newspaper discourse of two stages of the pandemic. Applied Corpus Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 100054 ff. DOI logo
Carretero, Marta
2023. ‘Noticeably Better / Visibly Shaken’: The Use of Four Adverbs of High Perceivability with Meanings of Attitude. <i>WORD</i> 69:2 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue