Review published In: Functions of Language
Vol. 26:3 (2019) ► pp.372–380
Book review
Lawrence N. Berlin, Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer (eds.) The dynamics of political discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups
Published online: 25 November 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.00023.ton
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.00023.ton
References (13)
Athanasiadou, Angeliki & Herbert L. Colston (eds.). 2017. Irony in language use and communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Berlin, Lawrence N. 2007. Cooperative conflict and evasive language: The case of the 9/11 commission hearings.” In Anita Fetzer (ed.), Context and appropriateness: Micro meets macro, 176–215. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2011. Fighting words: Hybrid discourse and discourse processes. In Anita Fetzer & Etsuko Oishi (eds.), Context and contexts, 41–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.). 2011. Understanding quotation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dynel, Marta. 2018. Irony, deception and humour: Seeking the truth about overt and covert untruthfulness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gu, Yueguo. 2010. The activity type as interface between language and parole, and between individual and society: An argument for trichotomy in pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society 1(1). 74–101.
Harré, Rom & Luk Van Langenhove. 1999. Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nuolijärvi, Pirkko & Liisa Tiittulab. 2011. Irony in political television debates. Journal of Pragmatics 43(2). 572–587.
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor & Maria Belén Alvarado Ortega (eds.). 2013. Irony and humor: From pragmatics to discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Saka, Paul & Michael Johnson (eds.). 2017. The semantics and pragmatics of quotation. Cham: Springer.
Searle, John R. 1992. Conversation revisited. In John R. Searle, Hermann Parret & Jef Verschueren (eds.), (On) Searle on conversation, 137–147. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Yus, Francisco. 2016. Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition 23(1). 92–116.