Cover not available

Article published In: English World-Wide
Vol. 36:2 (2015) ► pp.170–197

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

An Optimality-Theoretic approach to dialect code-switching

 | University of Kentucky
Published online: 29 May 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.2.02cra
Despite the numerous frameworks for analyzing patterns of code-switching (CS) in multilingual communities, previous analyses have lacked a thorough treatment of the universality of the functions of CS. A recent model (Bhatt and Bolonyai 2011) addresses this gap by presenting a framework that incorporates principles of Optimality Theory (OT) and offers a precise model in which the countless functions of CS are reduced to five meta-constraints, the interaction and satisfaction of which account for the different grammars of bilingual language use. This framework’s applicability to situations of dialectal CS must be tested in order to show the breadth and depth of the model. This paper presents a reanalysis of the data in Mishoe (1995), which utilized the Markedness Model (Myers-Scotton 1993), within Bhatt and Bolonyai’s (2011) OT framework, demonstrating that data previously analyzed using another model of CS receives a better account under Bhatt and Bolonyai’s OT approach.
References (34)
Adger, David, and Graeme Trousdale. 2007. “Variation in English Syntax: Theoretical Implications”. English Language and Linguistics 111: 261–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter, ed. 1998. Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1984. “Language Style as Audience Design”. Language in Society 131: 145–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Back in Style: Reworking Audience Design”. In Penelope Eckert, and John Rickford, eds. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–169.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rakesh M. 2000. “Optimal Expressions in Indian English”. English Language and Linguistics 41: 69–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rakesh M., and Agnes Bolonyai. 2011. “Code-Switching and the Optimal Grammar of Bilingual Language Use”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 141: 522–546. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Britt, Erica. 2011. “‘Can the Church Say Amen’: Strategic Uses of Black Preaching Style at the State of the Black Union”. Language in Society 401: 211–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolonyai, Agnes. 2005. “‘Who Was the Best?’: Power, Knowledge and Rationality in Bilingual Girls’ Code Choices”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 91: 3–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1999. “New Generalizations and Explanations in Language and Gender Research”. Language in Society 281: 185–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1987. “Code-Switching and Consciousness in the European Periphery”. American Ethnologist 141: 637–653. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greene, Deric M., and Felicia R. Walker. 2004. “Recommendations to Public Speaking Instructors for the Negotiation of Code-Switching Practices Among Black English-Speaking African American Students”. The Journal of Negro Education 731: 435–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 2000. “Gradient Well-Formedness in Optimality Theory”. In Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw, and Jeroen van de Weijer, eds. Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 88–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heller, Monica. 1995. “Code-Switching and the Politics of Language”. In Lesley Milroy, and Pieter Muysken, eds. One Speaker, Two Languages: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Code-Switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 158–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henry, Alison. 1995. Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Miriam Meyerhoff. 1999. “The Community of Practice: Theories and Methodologies in Language and Gender Research”. Language in Society 281: 173–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kovács, Timea. 2010. “The Applicability of Optimality Theory for the Analysis of Bilingual Grammar in the Hungarian-American Bilingual Community in North Carolina: A Comprehensive Description of the North Carolina Hungarian Club’s Code-Switching Patterns”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sciences, Pécs, Hungary.
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Young Sun. 2009. “Korean–English Code-Switching and Optimality Theory”. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Denver, CO.
Li, Wei. 1994. Three Generations, Two Languages, One Family: Language Choice and Language Shift in a Chinese Community in Britain. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mishoe, Margaret. 1995. “Dialect Codeswitching Among Lower Class Socioeconomic Speakers in the Southern United States: A Sociolinguistic Study”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1993. Social Motivations for Codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, ed. 1998. Codes and Consequences: Choosing Linguistic Varieties. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol, and Agnes Bolonyai. 2001. “Calculating Speakers: Codeswitching in a Rational Choice Model”. Language in Society 301: 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pederson, Lee, Susan Leas McDaniel, and Marvin H. Bassett, eds. 1986. The Linguistic Atlas of the Gulf States: A Concordance of the Basic Materials. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smitherman, Geneva. 2004. “Language and African Americans: Moving on up a Lil Higher”. Journal of English Linguistics 321: 186–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soukup, Barbara. 2011. “Austrian Listeners’ Perceptions of Standard–Dialect Style-Shifting: An Empirical Approach”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 151: 347–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wheeler, Rebecca. 2008. “Becoming Adept at Code-Switching”. Educational Leadership 651: 54–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, and Ralph Fasold. 1974. The Study of Social Dialects of American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn. 1988. “Codeswitching and Comedy in Catalonia”. In Monica Heller, ed. Codeswitching: Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bhatt, Rakesh & Agnes Bolonyai
2022. Multilingualism as an Object of Sociolinguistic Description. Languages 7:4 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Karimzad, Farzad
2018. Optimal choices: Azeri multilingualism in indigenous and diaspora contexts. International Journal of Bilingualism 22:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue