Article published In: English World-Wide
Vol. 28:2 (2007) ► pp.187–199
Intonational marking of new and given information in Cameroon English
Published online: 11 May 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.28.2.05oua
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.28.2.05oua
Studies on English intonation have shown that native English speakers consistently accent new information and deaccent given information in the discourse structure (Brown 1983; Fowler and Housum 1987; etc.). On the other hand, findings on the intonation of some non-native English varieties, Nigerian English (Gut 2003, 2005) and Indian English (Gumperz 1982) for example, suggest that speakers of these varieties of English rarely deaccent given information in the discourse structure, hence making both types of information prominent. This study reports findings of the analyses of the intonational marking of the two types of information in Cameroon English (CamE). Data from two speaking styles, the Passage Reading Style (PRS) and the Conversational Style (CS), were analysed both auditorily and acoustically. Results show that, unlike speakers of some other non-native varieties of English, Cameroon English speakers make new information more prominent than given information in the discourse structure. As for how Cameroon English speakers acoustically implement the intonational marking of new and given information, the findings further reveal that they make more use of intensity and duration than of other acoustic parameters like high pitch accent (H*), findings which are somewhat dissimilar to those documented in native varieties of English whereby the most obvious acoustic correlate of new information in discourse is the high pitch accent (H*).
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Kim, Jiseung & Anja Arnhold
Yap, Tsong Shiuan & Stefanie Pillai
Zerbian, Sabine
2015. Syntactic and prosodic focus marking in contact varieties of South African English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 36:2 ► pp. 228 ff.
OUAFEU, YVES TALLA SANDO
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
