Cover not available

Article published In: English World-Wide
Vol. 45:1 (2024) ► pp.1–29

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

The search for linguistically coherent accents

Unsupervised clustering of diphthong variation in Southeast England

ORCiD logo with link | University of Essex
 | University of Manchester
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with the University of Essex.

Published online: 14 September 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.22054.col
Abstract
Linguistic research refers to many related accents in Southeast England: Standard Southern British English (SSBE), Received Pronunciation (RP), Estuary English (EE), Cockney and Multicultural London English (MLE). However, there is inconsistency and imprecision in the demarcation of these accents based on linguistic and social factors. This paper delineates accents in Southeast England based on patterns of linguistic co-variation which we then relate to social predictors. We applied functional Principal Component Analysis to F1 and F2 measurements for diphthongs extracted from wordlist and passage productions for 193 young, south-eastern speakers. Principal Components were entered into a clustering analysis that identified patterns of linguistic co-occurrence. Three clusters emerge, broadly aligning with SSBE, MLE and EE for both linguistic and social factors. We illustrate the linguistic centre of gravity of the three diphthong systems for use as reference points in future research, and we discuss the need to make explicit how accents are defined.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Demarcating and defining accents
    • 1.2Who speaks SSBE?
    • 1.3Features of SSBE and related varieties
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Speakers
    • 2.2Items
    • 2.3Formant data processing
    • 2.4Dimensionality reduction
    • 2.5Analysis of individual features
    • 2.6Clustering analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Individual variables and their social predictors
    • 3.2Clustering results
  • 4.Discussion
  • References
References (50)
References
Agha, Asif. 2003. “The Social Life of Cultural Value”. Language and Communication 231: 231–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alderton, Roy. 2022. “T-Tapping in Standard Southern British English: An ‘Elite’ Sociolinguistic Variant?”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 261: 287–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altendorf, Urike. 2003. Estuary English: Levelling at the Interface of RP and South-Eastern British English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia, and Madeleine Atkins. 2016. “Uptalk in Southern British English”. In Jonathan Barnes, and Alejna Brugos. eds. Proceedings of Speech Prosody. Boston: Speech Prosody Special Interest Group, 153–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Badia Barrera, Berta. 2015. “A Sociolinguistic Study of T-Glottalling in Young RP: Accent, Class and Education”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Essex.
Beaman, Karen V., and Gregory R. Guy. 2022. “The Coherence of Linguistic Communities: Orderly Heterogeneity and Social Meaning”. In Karen V. Beaman, and Gregory R. Guy. eds. The Coherence of Linguistic Communities: Orderly Heterogeneity and Social Meaning. New York: Routledge, 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker, Kara. 2016. “Linking Community Coherence, Individual Coherence, and Bricolage: The Cooccurrence of (r), Raised bought and Raised bad in New York City English?” Lingua 1721: 87–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blackwood Ximenes, Arwen, Jason Shaw, and Christopher Carignan. 2017. “A Comparison of Acoustic and Articulatory Methods for Analyzing Vowel Differences across Dialects: Data from American and Australian English”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1421: 363–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1999. “Taming the Vernacular: Some Repercussions for the Study of Syntatic Variation and Spoken Grammar”. Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa 81: 59–80Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Susan Fox, Paul Kerswill, and Eivind Torgersen. 2008. “Ethnicity, Friendship Network and Social Practices as the Motor of Dialect Change: Linguistic Innovation in London”. Sociolinguistica 221: 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, Sue Fox, and Eivind Torgersen. 2011. “Contact, the Feature Pool and the Speech Community: The Emergence of Multicultural London English”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 151: 151–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chládková, Kateřina, Silke Hamann, Daniel Williams, and Sam Hellmuth. 2017. “F2 Slope as a Perceptual Cue for the Front–Back Contrast in Standard Southern British English”. Language and Speech 601: 377–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, Amanda. 2020. “Co-Variation, Style and Social Meaning: The Implicational Relationship Between (h) and (ing) in Debden, Essex”. Language Variation and Change 321: 349–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, Amanda, and Bronwen Evans. 2020. “Phonetic Variation and Change in the Cockney Diaspora: The Role of Gender and Identity”. Language in Society 501: 641–665. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, Amanda, and Patrycja Strycharczuk. 2022. “Dialect Levelling and Cockney Diphthong Shift Reversal in South East England: The Case of the Debden Estate”. English Language & Linguistics 261: 621–643. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deterding, David. 1997. “The Formants of Monophthong Vowels in Standard Southern British English Pronunciation”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 271: 47–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erker, Daniel. 2022. “How Social Salience Can Illuminate the Outcomes of Linguistic Contact: Data from Spanish in Boston”. In Karen V. Beaman, and Gregory R. Guy. eds. The Coherence of Linguistic Communities: Orderly Heterogeneity and Social Meaning. New York: Routledge, 145–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escudero, Paola, and Kateřina Chládková. 2010. “Spanish Listeners’ Perception of American and Southern British English vowels”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1281: 254–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Susan. 2015. The New Cockney: New Ethnicities and Adolescent Speech in the Traditional East End of London. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraley, Chris, and Adrian E. Raftery. 2002. “Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis and Density Estimation”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 971: 611–631. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraley, Chris, Adrian E. Raftery, Thomas Brendan Murphy, and Luca Scrucca. 2012. Mclust Version 4 for R: Normal Mixture Modeling for Model-Based Clustering, Classification, and Density Estimation. Technical Report. Version 4. <[URL]> (accessed September 20, 2022)
Gimson, Alfred. C. 1962. An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gregersen, Frans, and Pharao, Nicolai. 2016. “Lects are Perceptually Invariant, Productively Variable: A Coherent Claim about Danish Lects”. Lingua 172–1731: 26–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gubian, Michele, Francisco Torreira, and Lou Boves. 2015. “Using Functional Data Analysis for Investigating Multidimensional Dynamic Phonetic Contrasts”. Journal of Phonetics 491: 16–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. 2013. “The Cognitive Coherence of Sociolects: How do Speakers Handle Multiple Sociolinguistic Variables?” Journal of Pragmatics 521: 63–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R., and Frans Hinskens. 2016. “Linguistic Coherence: Systems, Repertoires and Speech Communities”. Lingua 172–1731: 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Felicitas Kleber, and Ulrich Reubold. 2008. Compensation for Coarticulation, /u/-Fronting, and Sound Change in Standard Southern British: An Acoustic and Perceptual Study”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1231: 2825–2835. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes-Elliott, Sophie and Erez Levon. 2017. “The Substance of Style: Gender, Social Class and Interactional Stance in Southeast England”. Linguistics 551: 1045–1072. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik, and Achim Zeileis. 2006. “Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework”. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 151: 651–674. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, Toby, Gea de Jong, Kirsty McDougall, Philip Harrison, and Francis Nolan. 2007. “F statistics for 100 young male speakers of Standard Southern British English.” In Jürgen Trouvain, and William J. Barry. eds. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Saarbrücken, Germany, 1809–1812. Hughes, Arthur, Peter Trudgill, and Dominic Watt. 2012. English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in The British Isles. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, Eivind Torgersen, and Susan Fox. 2008. “Reversing ‘Drift’: Innovation and Diffusion in the London Diphthong System”. Language Variation and Change 201: 451–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindsey, Geoff. 2019. English After RP: Standard British Pronunciation Today. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lobanov Boris, M. 1971. “Classification of Russian Vowels Spoken by Different Speakers”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 491: 606–608. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. 2019. ELAN. Version 5.4. <[URL]> (accessed September 20, 2022)
Nolan, Francis, Kirsty McDougall, Gea de Jong, and Toby Hudson. 2009. “The DyViS Database: Style-Controlled Recordings of 100 Homogeneous Speakers for Forensic Phonetic Research”. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 161: 31–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oushiro, Livia, and Gregory Guy. 2015. “The Effect of Salience on Co-Variation in Brazilian Portuguese?” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 211: 154–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter L. 2002. “The Speech Community”. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes. eds. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 573–597.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Przedlacka, Joanna. 2002. Estuary English? A Sociophonetic Study of Teenage Speech in the Home Counties. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R package version 4.1.0. <[URL].> (accessed September 20, 2022).
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Josef Fruehwald, Keelan Evanini, Scott Seyfarth, Kyle Gorman, Hilary Prichard, and Jiahong Yuan. 2014. FAVE (Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction). Version 1.2. <[URL]> (accessed September 20, 2022)
Torgersen, Eivind, and Paul Kerswill. 2004. “Internal and External Motivation in Phonetic Change. Dialect Levelling Outcomes for an English Vowel Shift”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 81: 23–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1990. The Dialects of England. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Sociolinguistic Variation and Change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin Herzog. 1968. “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change”. In Winfred P. Lehmann, and Yakov Malkiel. eds. Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press, 95–195.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. “What is Estuary English”. English Teaching Professional 31: 46–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. “Pinning Down Estuary English”. <[URL]> (accessed September 20, 2022).
Williams, Daniel, and Paola Escudero. 2014. “A Cross-Dialectal Acoustic Comparison of Vowels in Northern and Southern British English”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1361: 2751–2761. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Strycharczuk, Patrycja & Sam Kirkham
2025. Articulatory Strategies in Male and Female Vowel Production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Holmes-Elliott, Sophie & Erez Levon
2024. The jet set: Modern RP and the (re)creation of social distinction. Language Variation and Change 36:2 ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue