Cover not available

Article published In: English World-Wide
Vol. 44:2 (2023) ► pp.276–302

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Necessity modal development in Singapore English

An investigation of substratist and contact-grammaticalisation approaches

 | Université Paris Cité
Published online: 13 February 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.22019.bas
Abstract
Spoken in a multilingual environment characterised by continuous contacts with other languages, Singapore English (SgE) is a singular object of study. Its modal system has also been developing in independent ways compared to inner-circle varieties, e.g. British English, its historical ancestor. Different approaches have attempted to explain such developments, including the substratist and the grammaticalisation approaches. The present paper explores both these approaches with the aim of examining the role that they may have in the development of the (semi-)modal verbs of necessity in SgE. Using some corpus analysis conducted on informal data, it will be shown why the substratist approach does not seem sufficient to explain the relatively frequent non-epistemic uses of must in SgE. It will be discussed how SgE must could be instead replicating older dynamic uses, typical of Middle English times (1100–1500 CE), according to a process known as replica grammaticalisation as recapitulation (. 2014. “Replica Grammaticalisation as Recapitulation: The Other Side of Contact”. Diachronica 311: 106–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Previous accounts on modality in CSE
    • 3.1Bao’s (2010) “convergence-to-substratum”
    • 3.2Contact-grammaticalisation theories
  • 4.Data, methods, and terminology
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1RQ1: Does the modal system of necessity in SgE replicate that of Mandarin Chinese?
    • 5.2RQ2: Can Ziegeler’s (2014) theory explain the relatively frequent non-epistemic use of must in SgE today?
    • 5.3RQ3: What is the role and use of the other necessity modals in SgE compared to BrE?
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Summary and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
References (74)
Sources
HardwareZone. 2006. Singapore Press Holdings. <[URL]> (accessed February 10, 2022).
ICE Great Britain. The International Corpus of English. Compiled at University College London <[URL]> (accessed November 25, 2021).
Nihilani, Paroo, Ni Yibin, Anne Pakir, and Vincent Ooi. 2006. The ICE Corpus: The International Corpus of English, Singapore. Release 1. <[URL]> (accessed January 20, 2022)
Salary. 2000. The Rocket Studio, Singapore. <[URL]> (accessed February 15, 2022).
Survey of English Usage. 1998. The ICE Corpus: The International Corpus of English, Great Britain. Release 1. London: University College London. <[URL]> (accessed February 15, 2022).
Ziegeler, Debra, and Amelyn Thompson. 2007–2009. The Flowerpod Corpus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
References
Alsagoff, Lubna. 2010. “English in Singapore: Culture, Capital and Identity in Linguistic Variation”. World Englishes 291: 336–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2005. “The Aspectual System of Singapore English and the Systemic Substratist Explanation”. Journal of Linguistics 411: 237–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Must in Singapore English”. Lingua 1201: 1727–1737. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The Making of Vernacular Singapore English: System, Transfer and Filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byloo, Pieter, and Jan Nuyts. 2014. “Meaning Change in the Dutch Core Modals: (Inter)subjectification in a Grammatical Paradigm”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 461: 85–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burnley, David, and Alison Wiggins, eds. 2005. The Auchinleck Manuscript. Originally published in 1977 by Scolar Press in association with the National Library of Scotland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
“Census of Population 2020 Statistical Release 1”. 2021. Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade & Industry, Republic of Singapore. <[URL]> (accessed February 2, 2022).
Chambers, Raymond Wilson, and Walter W. Seton, eds. 1914. A Fifteenth-Century Courtesy Book and Two Franciscan Rules. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Weirong. 2020. The Grammar of Southern Min: The Hui’an Dialect. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse, and An Verhulst. 2008. “Source of Modality: A Reassessment”. English Language and Linguistics 121: 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deterding, David. 2007. Singapore English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas. 2007. “Dynamic Modality”. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 41: 46–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gregersen, Sune. 2020. Early English Modals: Form, Function and Analogy. LOT, Netherlands Graduate School.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gupta, Anthea F. 1991. “Almost a Creoloid: Singapore English”. California Linguistic Notes 231: 9–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gupta, Anthea Fraser. 1992. “The Pragmatic Particles of Singapore Colloquial English”. Journal of Pragmatics 181: 31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Edward McDonald. 2004. “Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Chinese”. In Alice Caffarel, James Robert Martin, and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen, eds. Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 305–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Beke. 2018. Corpus Linguistics and Sociolinguistics: A Study of Variation and Change in the Modal System of World Englishes. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries. Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva. 2003. “On Contact-Induced Grammaticalization”. Studies in Language 271: 529–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1986. The Alchemy of English. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj. B., ed. 1992. The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures (2nd ed.). University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel. 2014. “The Sketch Engine: ten years on”. Lexicography 11: 7–36. <[URL]> (accessed February 17, 2022).
Krug, Manfred, and Ole Schützler. 2013. “Recent Change and Grammaticalization”. In Bas Aarts, Geoffrey Leech, Joanne Close, and Jeremy Smith, eds. The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 155–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2013. “Where Have All the Modals Gone? An Essay on the Declining Frequency of Core Modal Auxiliaries in Recent Standard English”. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, eds. English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter. 95–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. “Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change”. Lingua e stile 201: 303–318.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leimgruber, Jakob R. E. 2009. “Modelling Variation in Singapore English”. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Oxford.
Leimgruber, Jakob R. 2013. Singapore English: Structure, Variation, and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leimgruber, Jakob R. E., Peter Siemund, and Laura Terassa. 2018. “Singaporean Students’ Language Repertoires and Attitudes Revisited”. World Englishes 371: 282–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leimgruber, Jakob R., Jun Lie Lim, Wilkinson Gonzales, and Mie Hiramoto. 2020. “Ethnic and Gender Variation in the Use of Colloquial Singapore English Discourse Particles”. English Language and Linguistics 251: 601–620. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen, and Virginia Yip. 2009. “Contact-Induced Grammaticalization: Evidence from Bilingual Acquisition”. Studies in Language 331: 366–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1915. “Le Renouvellement des Conjonctions”. Annuaire de I’École Pratique des Hautes Études 1915–6. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale. 9–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1958. Linguistique Historique et Linguistique Générale. Paris. Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2012. Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan, Pieter Byloo, and Janneke Diepeveen. 2010. “On Deontic Modality, Directivity, and Mood: The Case of Dutch mogen and moeten”. Journal of Pragmatics 421: 16–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1990. Modality and the English Modals (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perkins, Michael. 1993. Modal Expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Platt, John T., and Heidi Weber. 1980. English in Singapore and Malaysia: Status, Features, Functions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Platt, John T., Heidi Weber, and Mian Lian Ho. 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rissannen, Matti. 1984. The Helsinki Diachronic Corpus of English Texts (HDCET), electronic version. Department of English, University of Helsinki. <[URL]> (accessed February 3, 2022).
Ross, Claudia, and Jin-Heng Sheng Ma. 2006. Modern Mandarin Chinese Grammar: A Practical Guide. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. “The Dynamics of New Englishes: from Identity Construction to Dialect Birth”. Language 791: 233–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter, Monika Edith Schulz, and Martin Schweinberger. 2014. “Studying the Linguistic Ecology of Singapore: A Comparison of College and University Students”. World Englishes 331: 340–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Alexandra D’Arcy. 2007. “The Modals of Obligation/Necessity in Canadian Perspective”. English World-Wide 281: 47–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change”. Language 791: 233–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, and Vladimir Plungian. 1998. “Modality’s Semantic Map”. Linguistic Typology 21: 79–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Dirk Noël, and Astrid De Wit. 2012. “The Diverging Need (to)’s of Asian Englishes”. In Marianne Hundt, and Ulrike Gut, eds. Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 54–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wee, Lionel. 2011. Language Without rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiedenhof, Jeroen. 2015. A Grammar of Mandarin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra. 2003a. “On the Zero-Plural in Commercial Singaporean English”. In David Deterding, Adam Brown, and Ee-Ling Low, eds. English in Singapore: Research on Grammar. Singapore: McGraw Hill. 48–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003b. “On the Generic Origins of Modality in English”. In David Hart, ed. English Modality in Context. Bern: Peter Lang. 33–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “On the Interaction of Past Tense and Potentiality in Singaporean Colloquial English”. Language Sciences 341: 229–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Converging Grammars: Constructions in Singapore English”. In Yaron Matras, ed. Language Contact and Bilingualism 111. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Historical Replication in Contact grammaticalization”. In Van Olmen Daniël, Hubert Cuyckens, and Lobke Ghesquière, eds. Aspects of Grammaticalization: (Inter)subjectification, Analogy and Unidirectionality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 311–352.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Basile, Carmelo Alessandro
2025. Modal better: A corpus‐based investigation in world Englishes. World Englishes 44:3 ► pp. 318 ff. DOI logo
Basile, Carmelo Alessandro, Agnès Celle & Cameron Morin
2025. Cognitive approaches to variation and change in the English modal domain: introduction. English Language and Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 444 ff. DOI logo
Basile, Carmelo Alessandro, Christophe Lenoble & Debra Ziegeler
2025. On the rise of be having to in English: a cognitive-functional account. English Language and Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 547 ff. DOI logo
Coats, Steven, Carmelo Alessandro Basile, Cameron Morin & Robert Fuchs
2025. The YouTube corpus of Singapore English podcasts. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 46:3 ► pp. 274 ff. DOI logo
Shakir, Muhammad
2025. Modal verbs in South Asian Online Englishes: Exploring the use of must, (have) got to, have to and need to. World Englishes DOI logo
Morin, Cameron & Carmelo Alessandro Basile
2022. Elicitation and experimentation: implications for English sociolinguistics. Anglophonia 34 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue