Article published In: English World-Wide
Vol. 18:1 (1997) ► pp.91–105
Indian English
Some Myths, Some Realities
Published online: 1 January 1997
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.18.1.05dso
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.18.1.05dso
The New Varieties of English (e.g. IndE, SingE, NigE) have been studied for the last several decades. In the course of this study several 'myths' have arisen about these varieties and these myths have increasingly been accepted as facts. The main aim of this paper is to examine some of these myths and to try to reveal the realities behind them. I argue that as long as the myths are accepted as givens there can be no real progress in the study of the New Varieties. I will explore the myths in the context of IndE but the arguments provided apply to all the New Varieties. The myths I will deal with are:
1) IndE is a "non-native" variety of English.
2) IndE has no standards.
3) IndE lacks creativity.
4) IndE is the language of a small but dominant elite.
5) English is the cause of most of the problems in India and in the world.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Domange, Raphaël
Fuchs, Robert
Fuchs, Robert
Balasubramanian, Chandrika
2015. Corpus linguistics and New Englishes. In Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 66], ► pp. 147 ff.
Balasubramanian, Chandrika
Schmitz, John Robert
Mukherjee, Joybrato
Joseph, Clara A. B.
Kumaravadivelu, B.
D'souza, Jean
2000. Review of Krishnaswamy & Burde (1998): The Politics of Indians’ English: Linguistic Colonialism and the Expanding English Empire. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 21:1 ► pp. 151 ff.
Li, David C. S.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.