Cover not available

Article published In: English World-Wide
Vol. 41:3 (2020) ► pp.352–367

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Make us difficult

Portrait of a non-standard construction

 | University of Sheffield
Published online: 9 November 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00054.meh
Abstract
This paper introduces a previously undiscussed English construction, termed the make us difficult construction. Examples of the construction are presented, from the International Corpus of English and the Corpus of Global Web-Based English, and a quantitative analysis is conducted of the construction’s text frequency and variant rates. Quantitative data on specific usage patterns is employed to inform an analysis of the construction and its productivity, and recommendations are made for future research.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Preliminary observations on the standard in GloWbE
  • 3.The make us difficult construction: Corpus examples
    • 3.1The ICE corpora
    • 3.2The GloWbE corpus
  • 4.Variant rates for the make us difficult construction
    • 4.1The ICE corpora
    • 4.2The GloWbE corpus
  • 5.Usage patterns and productivity
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • Sources
  • References
References (12)
Sources
Davies, Mark. 2013. Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries (GloWbE) <[URL]>.
The International Corpus of English <[URL]>.
References
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chatti, Sami. 2012. “The Semantic Network of Causative MAKE”. ICAME Journal 351: 5–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins CoBUILD English Dictionary (2nd ed.). 1995. Glasgow: Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle and Åke Viberg. 2009. “How to Make Do with One Verb: A Corpus-Based Contrastive Study of Do and Make”. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 141: 67–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1996. “Introducing ICE”. In Sidney Greenbaum, ed. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampe, Beate. 2011. “Discovering Constructions by Means of Collostruction Analysis: The English Denominative Construction”. Cognitive Linguistics 221: 211–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
OED Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press <[URL]> (accessed December 1, 2018).
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Jason Grafmiller, Joan Bresnan, Anette Rosenbach, Sali Tagliamonte, and Simon Todd. 2017. “Spoken Syntax in a Comparative Perspective: The Dative and Genitive Alternation in Varieties of English”. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 21: 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue