Cover not available

Article published In: English World-Wide
Vol. 41:3 (2020) ► pp.267–294

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

A socio­linguistic perspective on the (quasi-)modals of obligation and necessity in Australian English

 | University of Derby | La Trobe University
 | Macquarie University
Published online: 9 November 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00051.pen
Abstract
This article examines the distribution and socio­linguistic patterning of (quasi-)modals which express strong obligation/necessity, namely must, have to, have got to, got to and need to, in Australian English. Variationist studies in other varieties of English have had contrasting findings in terms of distributions of root forms, as well as their conditioning by social and linguistic factors. The corpus analysis suggests real-time increased use of need to and decrease in have got to through comparison to earlier findings. The variationist analysis shows quasi-modals have to, have got to and got to as sensitive to speaker age and sex, and a recent increase of have to via apparent time modelling. Linguistic conditioning relating to the type of obligation and subject form is also found. The study contributes to socio­linguistic understanding of this large-scale change in English and the place of Australian English amongst other varieties.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Context and focus
    • 1.2The forms
  • 2.Previous research
    • 2.1In Australian English
    • 2.2Sociolinguistic work in other varieties of English
  • 3.This study
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Analysis
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Corpus analysis of distribution
    • 4.2Variationist analysis
      • 4.2.1Social factors
      • 4.2.2Linguistic factors
      • 4.2.3Multivariate analysis
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (40)
References
Baker, Paul. 2011. “Times May Change, but We Will Always Have Money: Diachronic Variation in Recent British English”. Journal of English Linguistics 391: 65–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Close, Joanne and Bas Aarts. 2010. “Current Change in the Modal System of English: A Case Study of Must, Have to and Have Got To”. In Ursula Lenker, Judith Hurber, and Robert Mailhammer, eds. English Historical Linguistics 2008. Vol. 1: The History of English Verbal and Nominal Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 165–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Peter C. 1991. “The Modals of Obligation and Necessity in Australian English”. In Karin Aijmer, and Bengt Altenberg, eds. English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, 145–165.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. “Modal Wars: Some Ascendant Semi-Modals in Australian English”. In Jeff Siegel, John Lynch, and Diana Eades, eds. Language Description, History and Development: Linguistic Indulgence in Memory of Terry Crowley. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 197–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009a. Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009b. “Modals and Quasi-Modals”. In Peter C. Collins, Pam Peters, and Adam Smith, eds. Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 73–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. “Quasi-Modals and Modals in Australian English Fiction 1800–1999, with Comparisons across British and American English”. Journal of English Linguistics 421: 7–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denis, Derek and Alexandra D’Arcy. 2019. “Deriving Homogeneity in a Settler Colonial Variety of English”. American Speech 941: 223–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse and Susan Reed. 2006. “Mood and Modality in English”. In Bas Aarts, and April McMahon, eds. Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 269–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Downes, William. 1998. Language and Society (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fehringer, Carol and Karen P. Corrigan. 2015. “‘You’ve Got to Sort of Eh Hoy the Geordie Out’: Modals of Obligation and Necessity in Fifty Years of Tyneside English”. English Language and Linguistics 191: 355–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Beke. 2018. Corpus Linguistics and Sociolinguistics: A Study of Variation and Change in the Modal Systems of World Englishes. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, Michol F. and James A. Walker. 2014. “‘Toronto Has Everything’, ‘Toronto’s Got It All’: Ethnolinguistic Dimensions of Have in Toronto English”. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 43, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign and University of Illinois at Chicago.
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jankowski, Bridget. 2004. “A Transatlantic Perspective of Variation and Change in English Deontic Modality”. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 231: 85–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2017. Rbrul (Version 3.1.1) <[URL]>.
Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. “The Social Motivation of a Sound Change”. Word 191: 273–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 2013. “Where Have All the Modals Gone? An Essay on the Declining Frequency of Core Modal Auxiliaries in Recent Standard English”. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, eds. English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter, 95–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N., Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lowry, Richard. 2011–2017. Vassar Stats. Vassar College, Poughkeepsie <[URL]>.
Mair, Christian. 2014. “Do We Got a Difference? Divergent Developments of Semi-Auxiliary (Have) Got (to) in British and American English”. In Marianne Hundt, ed. Late Modern English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nokkonen, Soili. 2010. “‘How Many Taxis There Needs to Be?’ The Sociolinguistic Variation of Need to in Spoken British English”. Corpora 51: 45–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. 1990. Modality and the English Modals (2nd ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penry Williams, Cara. 2018. “The Analytic Importance of Metapragmatics in Variationist Methodology: Voicings within Australian English”. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 22, University of Auckland.
. 2019a. “Appeals to Semiotic Registers in Ethno-Metapragmatic Accounts of Variation”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 291: 294–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019b. Folklinguistics and Social Meaning in Australian English. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penry Williams, Cara and Minna Korhonen. 2018. “Variation and Change in Possession and Root Modality in Australian English: The Declining Fortunes of Have Got”. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 22, University of Auckland.
Smith, Nicholas. 2003. “Changes in the Modals and Semi-Modals of Strong Obligation and Epistemic Necessity in Recent British English”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer, and Manfred Krug, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 241–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2004. “Have to, Gotta, Must?: Grammaticalisation, Variation and Specialization in English Deontic Modality”. In Hans Lindquist, and Christian Mair, eds. Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 33–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Roots of English: Exploring the History of Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Alexandra D’Arcy. 2007. “The Modals of Obligation/Necessity in Canadian Perspective”. English World-Wide 281: 47–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative”. In Florian Coulmas, ed. Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 311–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, James A. and Michol F. Hoffman. 2016. “Ethnolinguistic Variation in Toronto English: Possession and Deontic Modality”. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of American Linguistics Society, Marriott Marquis Washington, DC.
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Alhedayani, Rukayah & Ghuzayyil Mohammed Al-Otaibi
2025. Arabic translations of the English adjective 'necessary': a corpus-driven lexical study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12:1 DOI logo
Gardner, Matt Hunt
2025. A Guide to Build (ING) Generalised Linear Mixed Model Trees in Canadian Maritime English: Part 1, Social Factors. Language and Linguistics Compass 19:6 DOI logo
Nie, Chunyuan, Lea Meriläinen & Mikko Laitinen
2025. Alternation of must, have to, and need to in English as a lingua franca. World Englishes DOI logo
Travis, Catherine E. & Rena Torres Cacoullos
2023. Form and function covariation: Obligation modals in Australian English. Language Variation and Change 35:3 ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue