Cover not available

Article published In: English World-Wide
Vol. 41:1 (2020) ► pp.1–32

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The way-construction in World Englishes

 | Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
 | Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
Published online: 24 February 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00038.bru
Abstract
The way-construction (e.g. He sang his way into our hearts) is a highly idiomatic English Argument Structure construction. Apart from a brief discussion in Davies and Fuchs (Davies, Mark and Robert Fuchs. 2015. “Expanding Horizons in the Study of World Englishes with the 1.9 Billion Word Global Web-Based English Corpus (GloWbE)”. English World-Wide 361: 1–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar: 13), however, no study has looked at the construction in World Englishes. Drawing on more than 14,000 tokens from the Corpus of Global Web-Based English (GloWbE), we present the first in-depth empirical analysis of the construction across various types of World Englishes. Our results provide support for . 2014. “The Cognitive Evolution of Englishes: The Role of Constructions in the Dynamic Model”. In Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber, and Alexander Kautzsch, eds. The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 160–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar claim of the correlation of Dynamic Model stage (Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. “The Dynamics of New Englishes: From Identity Construction to Dialect Birth”. Language 791: 233–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) and constructional productivity: the overall frequency of the construction as well as the productivity of the verbal, nominal, and prepositional slots of the construction correlate positively with a variety’s phase in the Dynamic Model. Moreover, it turns out that the less entrenched a variety is according to the Dynamic Model, the stronger is its tendency to select specific prototypical, or frequent, fillers in the constructional slots. Finally, we find no evidence for the reliteralisation hypothesis, i.e. that less advanced varieties exhibit a preference for concrete verbs or nouns.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1The Dynamic Model of the evolution of New Englishes
    • 2.2Construction Grammar
    • 2.3The way-construction from a Construction Grammar perspective
    • 2.4Dimensions of constructional variation in World Englishes
      • 2.4.1Productivity of constructions in World Englishes
      • 2.4.2Frequency of non-compositional constructions in New Englishes
      • 2.4.3Preference for prototypical fillers
      • 2.4.4Semantic effects on constructions in New Englishes
    • 2.5Hypotheses
  • 3.Data and methods
    • 3.1Dataset
    • 3.2Variables and annotation
    • 3.3Statistical methods
      • 3.3.1HCFA tests
      • 3.3.2LRNE models
      • 3.3.3Mixed effects models
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Overall frequency
    • 4.2Productivity of the slots
    • 4.3The selection of lexical fillers
      • 4.3.1The fillers in the verbal slot by evolutionary stage (two-way associations)
      • 4.3.2The fillers in the prepositional slot by evolutionary stage(two-way associations)
      • 4.3.3Three-way associations between verbal slot, prepositional slot and evolutionary stage
    • 4.4Semantic aspects of the slot fillers
      • 4.4.1The proportions of motion verbs
      • 4.4.2concreteness of the V slot
      • 4.4.3concreteness of N slot
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
References (47)
Sources
Davies, Mark. 2013. “Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 Billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countries” <[URL]>.
References
Baayen, R. Harald. 2001. Word Frequency Distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Variation: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity”. In Anke Lüdeling, and Merja Kytö, eds. Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Vol. 21. Berlin: De Gruyter, 899–919.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baroni, Marco and Stefan Evert. 2014. “The zipfR Package for Lexical Statistics: A Tutorial Introduction”. October 3, 2014 <[URL]> (accessed October 8, 2018).
Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruckmaier, Elisabeth. 2017. Getting at Get in World Englishes: A Corpus-Based Semasiological-Syntactic Analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc, Amy Beth Warriner, and Victor Kuperman. 2014. “Concreteness Ratings for 40 Thousand Generally Known English Word Lemmas”. Behavior Research Methods 461: 904–911. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Callies, Marcus. 2011. “Widening the Goalposts of Cognitive Metaphor Research”. In Marcus Callies, Wolfram R. Keller, and Astrid Lohöfer, eds. Bi-Directionality in the Cognitive Sciences: Avenues, Challenges, and Limitations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 57–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Derivation by Phase”. In Michael Kenstowicz, ed. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. 2013. “Construction Grammar and Second Language Acquisition”. In Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 365–378.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan. 2004. “A Simple LNRE Model for Random Character Sequences”. In Gérald Purnelle, Cédrick Fairon, and Anne Dister, eds. Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis. Louvain-la-Neuve: UCL, 411–422.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa. 2019. “A Construction of Independent Means: The History of the Way Construction Revisited. English Language and Linguistics 231: 671–699. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone”. Language 641: 501–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and Jennifer Hill. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. “Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language”. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 71: 219–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Thomas. 2004. HCFA 3.2 – A Program for Hierarchical Configural Frequency Analysis <[URL]>.
. 2009. Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2011. Preposition Placement in English: A Usage-based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “The Cognitive Evolution of Englishes: The Role of Constructions in the Dynamic Model”. In Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber, and Alexander Kautzsch, eds. The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 160–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas and Graeme Trousdale, eds. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Israel, Michael. 1996. “The Way Constructions Grow”. In Adele E. Goldberg, ed. Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford: CSLI, 217–230.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1993. Semantic Structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondorf, Britta. 2010. “Variation and Change in English Resultative Constructions”. Language Variation and Change 221: 397–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
OED Online. 2019. <[URL]> (accessed October 21, 2019).
Perek, Florent. 2018. “Recent Change in the Productivity and Schematicity of the Way-Construction: A Distributional Semantic Analysis”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 141: 65–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Productivity”. In Bas Aarts, and April M. S. McMahon, eds. The Handbook of English Linguistics. Malden: Blackwell, 537–556. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2016. English Morphology and Word-Formation: An Introduction (3rd ed.). Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. “The Dynamics of New Englishes: From Identity Construction to Dialect Birth”. Language 791: 233–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. “How to Trace Structural Nativization: Particle Verbs in World Englishes”. World Englishes 231: 227–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skandera, Paul. 2003. Drawing a Map of Africa. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Stefan Thomas Gries. 2005. “Covarying Collexemes”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11: 1–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steger, Maria and Edgar W. Schneider. 2012. “Complexity as a Function of Iconicity: The Case of Complement Clause Constructions in New Englishes”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, eds. Linguistic Complexity: Second Language Acquisition, Indigenization, Contact. Berlin: De Gruyter, 156–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczesniak, Konrad. 2013. “You Can’t Cry your Way to Candy: Motion Events and Paths in the X’s Way Construction”. Cognitive Linguistics 241: 159–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeldes, Amir. 2013. “Productive Argument Selection: Is Lexical Semantics Enough?”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 91: 263–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (18)

Cited by 18 other publications

Basile, Carmelo Alessandro
2025. Modal better: A corpus‐based investigation in world Englishes. World Englishes 44:3 ► pp. 318 ff. DOI logo
Colleman, Timothy & Dirk Noël
2025. Constructions and Lectal Variation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Construction Grammar, ► pp. 497 ff. DOI logo
González Romero, Luisa
2025. On the use of the way-construction with the verb make: A diachronic perspective . Complutense Journal of English Studies 33 ► pp. e102798 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Edgar W.
2025. The Dynamic Model. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of World Englishes, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tamaredo, Iván
2025. Testing lexical specificity hypotheses in world Englishes: evidence from the null subject alternation. Folia Linguistica DOI logo
Th. Gries, Stefan
2025. Corpus Linguistics and the Cognitive/Constructional Endeavor. In The Cambridge Handbook of Construction Grammar, ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Tishchenko, Svetlana V., Svetlana A. Petrenko & Alexander Ph. Petrenko
2025. The Advantage of Cognitive Approach to Various Semantic Aspects of English Way Construction Within the Framework of AI Technologies. In Management of Digital Technologies in the Innovative Economy [Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation, ], ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Vartiainen, Turo, Marcus Callies & Aatu Liimatta
2025. The productivity of the Complex Modifier Construction in World Englishes. English Language and Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 389 ff. DOI logo
Hartmann, Stefan & Alexander Willich
2024. Collostructional Analysis Meets Construction Semantics: Revisiting the English Way-Construction and Its German Equivalents. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 72:3 ► pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Horsch, Jakob
2023. Corroborating Corpus Data with Elicited Introspection Data: A Case Study. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 74:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Horsch, Jakob
2024. Cuanto(s) más datos, (tanto) mejor. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Brunner, Thomas
2022.  Into-causatives in World Englishes. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 43:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hundt, Marianne
2021. On models and modelling. World Englishes 40:3 ► pp. 298 ff. DOI logo
Akinlotan, Mayowa
2020. Relativiser Alternation and Relative Clause Complexity: Insights from Nigerian and American Varieties. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :29/2 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Akinlotan, Mayowa
2023. Calling a spade a shovel: A cognitive construction account of BE-relativisation. Studia Neophilologica 95:1 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Hoffmann, Thomas
2020. Marginal Argument Structure constructions: the [VtheNtaboo-wordout of]-construction in Post-colonial Englishes. Linguistics Vanguard 6:1 DOI logo
Hoffmann, Thomas
2021. The Cognitive Foundation of Post-colonial Englishes, DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. English across Borders [Varieties of English Around the World, G72], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue