Cover not available

Article published In: EUROSLA Yearbook: Volume 6 (2006)
Edited by Susan H. Foster-Cohen, Marta Medved Krajnovic and Jelena Mihaljević Djigunović
[EUROSLA Yearbook 6] 2006
► pp. 2756

Get fulltext from our e-platform
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Kim, Heejin
2025. Roles of L1 and semantic features in L2 morpheme acquisition: The development of morphology in L2 English for Korean learners. Second Language Research DOI logo
Wagner, Thomas
2023. The Empirical Study. In English Interlanguage Morphology,  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Clahsen, Harald & Anna Jessen
2021. Morphological generalization in bilingual language production: Age of acquisition determines variability. Language Acquisition 28:4  pp. 370 ff. DOI logo
Martins, Custódio & Mário Pinharanda-Nunes
2020. The Lexical Aspect Hypothesis. In Linguistic approaches to portuguese as an additional language [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 24],  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
NICOLADIS, Elena, Yuehan YANG & Zixia JIANG
2020. Whyjumpedis so difficult: tense/aspect marking in Mandarin–English bilingual children. Journal of Child Language 47:5  pp. 1073 ff. DOI logo
Gaffney, Caitlin
2015. L’acquisition L2 des compléments infinitifs français par des apprenants anglophones. Arborescences :5  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
NICOLADIS, ELENA, JIANHUI SONG & PAULA MARENTETTE
2012. Do young bilinguals acquire past tense morphology like monolinguals, only later? Evidence from French–English and Chinese–English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics 33:3  pp. 457 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue